Published on
by

Parkland High School Students Show Remarkable Political Savvy

In the wake of the horrific Valentine’s Day shooting, survivors have become sophisticated political instigators.

Students from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, including Emma Gonzalez (C), stand together on stage with other young victims of gun violence at the conclusion of the March for Our Lives rally on March 24, 2018 in Washington, DC. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

On Valentine’s Day, 17 people were killed at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla. Rather than grieve silently or out of public view, student leaders took hold of their own narrative by rejecting the common platitudes of “thoughts and prayers” that are typically offered after such all-too-common tragedies.

The Parkland students demanded action from lawmakers in Tallahassee, from the President and from Congress. In Tallahassee, they achieved the previously unthinkable: improvements on gun control in a state where Republicans control both houses of the legislature and the governor’s mansion.  Even the President sat down with some Parkland students and other gun violence survivors. In his hand, the President held a card that read, “I hear you.” He mumbled about banning bump stocks and then turned his attention elsewhere. And needless to say, the Republican-controlled House and Senate have done nothing to address gun violence since Parkland.

But the Parkland students are resilient, and they have shown savvy and determination in the gun control policy debate, which often resembles a ritualized kabuki play. One of the ways that the students have shown their moxie is by going after the financial ties between the NRA and politicians.  They have also gone after the links between commercial brands and the NRA to weaken those sources of financial support.  For example, they forced the major airlines to drop discounts for NRA members. They also instigated a boycott of advertisers on Laura Ingraham’s Fox News show after she attacked one of the Parkland student leaders. (I warned about the risk of boycotts as a consequence of corporate political activity here.)

My local grocery store, Publix, stepped into this maelstrom when it decided to support Adam Putnam, who is running for the GOP nomination for Florida governor.  Putnam has referred to himself as “a proud NRA sellout” who brags about his A+ rating from the group. The Associated Press has reported Publix has given Putnam $413,000 over the past three years.

The Parkland students decided to stage die-ins at two Publix stores near Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School to protest the company’s support for Putnam.  Publix’s reaction was swift. The grocer announced that it would immediately  suspend all corporate political donations. The Parkland students are making brands accountable that become entangled in the NRA-politician nexus.

The other way the Parkland students are showing a deft understanding of politics is by encouraging students, many of whom are on the cusp of turning 18, to register to vote and oust  politicians cozy with the NRA. Thus, the students may want to keep an eye on a lawsuit by the League of Women Voters of Florida challenging a ban on early voting on Florida state university grounds.

The complaint alleges that the Florida Secretary of State is violating the Constitution by banning early voting on public university grounds, which he has since 2014.  This ban makes it harder for college students who live on campus to vote early. The ban also treats them differently than their senior citizen counterparts who often vote early at the senior centers where they live.  Plaintiffs in the case raise equal protection claims about disparate treatment of voters because of the campus ban as well as Twenty-Sixth Amendment arguments. (The Twenty-Sixth Amendment lowered the voting age to 18.) In the complaint, the lawyers argue that the voter drives inspired by the Parkland students may be for naught if those new voters find barriers to voting on campus.

This case is just getting started, so it may be a while before Florida college students find a remedy. But if I were the Secretary of State of Florida, I might think about lifting the campus ban and allow early voting because the Parkland students are not playing around. Using the democratic process and political protest, they are fighting for their --and by extension--our lives.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy

Ciara Torres-Spelliscy is a Brennan Center Fellow and an Associate Professor of Law at Stetson University College of Law. She is the author of Safeguarding Markets from Pernicious Pay to Play: A Model Explaining Why the SEC Regulates Money in Politics.

Share This Article