SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Can You Keep a Secret on International Women's Day?
Some pretty mighty men fell this last year... Except one
Mar 08, 2018
On this International Women's Day it's amazing how many people are still against a woman making a buck. While men across the developed world chase the almighty dollar and get cheered on for it, women with the same desire for cash are still called names: from aggressive to greedy. And while living the capitalist dream is pretty far from the origins of International Women's Day, it is rather remarkable that after more than a hundred years of celebrating, women are still vilified for their commercial appetites.
A hundred-and-one years ago, women in Russia protested for "bread and peace." World War I had been raging for 33 months and both bread and peace were hard to come by. But the women stood up for it anyway.
It'd be difficult to miss the similarities today. Oh sure, in the U.S. wars are more out-of-sight, out-of-mind then the Great War was to women in Eastern Europe in 1917, but an occasional photo from Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, or one of the dozens of U.S. conflict zones around the world shows a woman or her child desperately in need of both peace and bread.
These unresolved conflicts that impact women so devastatingly on the other side of the world beg for the focus to remain on war and hunger--but because of the distance and lack of media focus, the purpose of International Women's Day in the western world has morphed. Women in developed nations remain relatively insulated from bloody conflicts and have the luxury to fight for social and economic justice. More specifically, in the United States, women fight for adequate pay and they fight for control over their bodies.
Women's roles have changed. Women's work was once literally comfort-giving. Comfort their partner, raise the children, keep the secrets, encourage the ambitions of the men in their lives: you name it--women did it for less money and with less control over their own futures than the men they supported.
Gradually this seemed to be changing. Then, suddenly, everyone from Hollywood to Washington, D.C. l watched as the slow sea change turned to a tsunami. Women across America stopped doing their most integral comfort job--they stopped keeping secrets. The #MeToo movement knocked men off their pedestals. Women ratted out abusers. Women came clean on all the unlawful sexual requirements made of them by their supervisors, while those same men accumulated greater power, wealth and prestige.
And wow, some pretty mighty men fell. They fell far and they fell fast.
Except one. Somehow the man who made his confession in an Access Hollywood tape has yet to fall. But this International Women's Day that might actually change. See, in the past, the President of the United States--or someone working for him--has been able to secure the silence of his accusers. Until now, when it appears that a lawsuit might free up one of his former loves to speak freely of their affair.
So what is America's response? President Trump's defenders have attacked Stephanie Clifford's character. Better known by her stage name, Stormy Daniels, Ms. Clifford's detractors insist she can't be trusted because of how she makes her money and what she does with her body.
Really? That again.
Here's how to tell that society does not view women the same way that it views men. The fallback discussion about whether a woman is trustworthy is what she does with her body. That is not the conversation going on right now about the president's actions and whether he can be trusted. Secondly, it's pretty easy to tell that the president trusts Clifford. Because the discussion has never been about whether President Trump paid Clifford for sex. No, the lawsuit is about whether or not Trump--or someone acting on his behalf--paid her to provide that ultimate comfort: keeping a secret.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Pat Lamarche
Pat LaMarche is an author, activist and advocate. She is the author of "Left Out In America: The State of Homelessness in the United States" (Updated, 2020). Her novel, "The Magic Diary" (2019) is now available.
On this International Women's Day it's amazing how many people are still against a woman making a buck. While men across the developed world chase the almighty dollar and get cheered on for it, women with the same desire for cash are still called names: from aggressive to greedy. And while living the capitalist dream is pretty far from the origins of International Women's Day, it is rather remarkable that after more than a hundred years of celebrating, women are still vilified for their commercial appetites.
A hundred-and-one years ago, women in Russia protested for "bread and peace." World War I had been raging for 33 months and both bread and peace were hard to come by. But the women stood up for it anyway.
It'd be difficult to miss the similarities today. Oh sure, in the U.S. wars are more out-of-sight, out-of-mind then the Great War was to women in Eastern Europe in 1917, but an occasional photo from Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, or one of the dozens of U.S. conflict zones around the world shows a woman or her child desperately in need of both peace and bread.
These unresolved conflicts that impact women so devastatingly on the other side of the world beg for the focus to remain on war and hunger--but because of the distance and lack of media focus, the purpose of International Women's Day in the western world has morphed. Women in developed nations remain relatively insulated from bloody conflicts and have the luxury to fight for social and economic justice. More specifically, in the United States, women fight for adequate pay and they fight for control over their bodies.
Women's roles have changed. Women's work was once literally comfort-giving. Comfort their partner, raise the children, keep the secrets, encourage the ambitions of the men in their lives: you name it--women did it for less money and with less control over their own futures than the men they supported.
Gradually this seemed to be changing. Then, suddenly, everyone from Hollywood to Washington, D.C. l watched as the slow sea change turned to a tsunami. Women across America stopped doing their most integral comfort job--they stopped keeping secrets. The #MeToo movement knocked men off their pedestals. Women ratted out abusers. Women came clean on all the unlawful sexual requirements made of them by their supervisors, while those same men accumulated greater power, wealth and prestige.
And wow, some pretty mighty men fell. They fell far and they fell fast.
Except one. Somehow the man who made his confession in an Access Hollywood tape has yet to fall. But this International Women's Day that might actually change. See, in the past, the President of the United States--or someone working for him--has been able to secure the silence of his accusers. Until now, when it appears that a lawsuit might free up one of his former loves to speak freely of their affair.
So what is America's response? President Trump's defenders have attacked Stephanie Clifford's character. Better known by her stage name, Stormy Daniels, Ms. Clifford's detractors insist she can't be trusted because of how she makes her money and what she does with her body.
Really? That again.
Here's how to tell that society does not view women the same way that it views men. The fallback discussion about whether a woman is trustworthy is what she does with her body. That is not the conversation going on right now about the president's actions and whether he can be trusted. Secondly, it's pretty easy to tell that the president trusts Clifford. Because the discussion has never been about whether President Trump paid Clifford for sex. No, the lawsuit is about whether or not Trump--or someone acting on his behalf--paid her to provide that ultimate comfort: keeping a secret.
Pat Lamarche
Pat LaMarche is an author, activist and advocate. She is the author of "Left Out In America: The State of Homelessness in the United States" (Updated, 2020). Her novel, "The Magic Diary" (2019) is now available.
On this International Women's Day it's amazing how many people are still against a woman making a buck. While men across the developed world chase the almighty dollar and get cheered on for it, women with the same desire for cash are still called names: from aggressive to greedy. And while living the capitalist dream is pretty far from the origins of International Women's Day, it is rather remarkable that after more than a hundred years of celebrating, women are still vilified for their commercial appetites.
A hundred-and-one years ago, women in Russia protested for "bread and peace." World War I had been raging for 33 months and both bread and peace were hard to come by. But the women stood up for it anyway.
It'd be difficult to miss the similarities today. Oh sure, in the U.S. wars are more out-of-sight, out-of-mind then the Great War was to women in Eastern Europe in 1917, but an occasional photo from Syria, Afghanistan, Yemen, or one of the dozens of U.S. conflict zones around the world shows a woman or her child desperately in need of both peace and bread.
These unresolved conflicts that impact women so devastatingly on the other side of the world beg for the focus to remain on war and hunger--but because of the distance and lack of media focus, the purpose of International Women's Day in the western world has morphed. Women in developed nations remain relatively insulated from bloody conflicts and have the luxury to fight for social and economic justice. More specifically, in the United States, women fight for adequate pay and they fight for control over their bodies.
Women's roles have changed. Women's work was once literally comfort-giving. Comfort their partner, raise the children, keep the secrets, encourage the ambitions of the men in their lives: you name it--women did it for less money and with less control over their own futures than the men they supported.
Gradually this seemed to be changing. Then, suddenly, everyone from Hollywood to Washington, D.C. l watched as the slow sea change turned to a tsunami. Women across America stopped doing their most integral comfort job--they stopped keeping secrets. The #MeToo movement knocked men off their pedestals. Women ratted out abusers. Women came clean on all the unlawful sexual requirements made of them by their supervisors, while those same men accumulated greater power, wealth and prestige.
And wow, some pretty mighty men fell. They fell far and they fell fast.
Except one. Somehow the man who made his confession in an Access Hollywood tape has yet to fall. But this International Women's Day that might actually change. See, in the past, the President of the United States--or someone working for him--has been able to secure the silence of his accusers. Until now, when it appears that a lawsuit might free up one of his former loves to speak freely of their affair.
So what is America's response? President Trump's defenders have attacked Stephanie Clifford's character. Better known by her stage name, Stormy Daniels, Ms. Clifford's detractors insist she can't be trusted because of how she makes her money and what she does with her body.
Really? That again.
Here's how to tell that society does not view women the same way that it views men. The fallback discussion about whether a woman is trustworthy is what she does with her body. That is not the conversation going on right now about the president's actions and whether he can be trusted. Secondly, it's pretty easy to tell that the president trusts Clifford. Because the discussion has never been about whether President Trump paid Clifford for sex. No, the lawsuit is about whether or not Trump--or someone acting on his behalf--paid her to provide that ultimate comfort: keeping a secret.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.