SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
High school students hold a vigil for the victims of the Parkland, Florida school shooting. (Photo: Fabrice Florin / Flickr)
No, Teachers Shouldn't Have Shootouts With Students
Because a "Good Guy With a Gun" isn't enough and why people need to treat gun control as the "do or die" issue it is
Feb 28, 2018
After the massacre of kindergarteners at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, the gun lobby offered its usual blame-the-victims, good-guy-with-a-gun excuse: If only the teachers had been armed!
This time, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, someone did have a gun -- but the armed school resource deputy chose to hunker down outside while the mass murderer finished his work, rather than entering to confront the killer.
The now former deputy hasn't explained his failure to act. Perhaps his inaction was simply cowardice.
But this good guy with a gun might well have decided, after he heard the spray of semi-automatic weapon fire, that his handgun wasn't going to be enough to stop a killer with a high-power assault rifle.
"The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed."
Maybe he thought entering that building would be brave but suicidal.
How admirable it would have been for the deputy to lay down his life for those children. But expecting people to give their lives isn't really a plan for stopping school shootings. Telling school guards, teachers, and coaches they should be ready to engage in shoot-outs with heavily-armed killers doesn't fix the problem.
The proposal that armed citizens are the answer to armed killers is out of touch with reality. The suggestion that professional guards can do much better is equally unrealistic. Most school guards likely feel they didn't sign up for urban warfare against military hardware.
There are about 130,000 elementary, middle, and high schools in America. If every single one of them had an armed guard ready to give up his or her life, armed with their own assault rifle, the next mass killer would begin by abruptly pulling out his handgun and shooting the guard.
Does anyone really imagine that all day, every day, every guard in every school will have his or her gun at the ready?
Perhaps one regular armed guard isn't enough, then. How about a platoon of U.S. Marines at each entrance to every school? And shouldn't they have their guns drawn at all times, trained on the entering students, safeties off?
Would this make our children feel safe?
I know I'm not the only one to think there's something wrong with this picture. Most of us understand full well that more people with guns -- or engaging in an arms race with deranged killers -- isn't the answer.
The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed.
Most Americans appear to agree that stronger gun control is the answer. But that hasn't been enough to cause our government to act. Why? It's not enough to say that the NRA and its fanatical supporters are too strong.
The real problem isn't just those who regard guns as sacred. The problem is ordinary citizens who don't want assault weapons on the streets or in our schools but don't treat this as a "do-or-die" issue -- which it literally is.
While many people care, they need to care more. Maybe the activism of the survivors in Florida can change this.
If you're appalled when school children are gunned down, but not appalled enough to hold the people who enable that accountable, you're part of the problem.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Mitchell Zimmerman
Mitchell Zimmerman is an attorney, longtime social activist, and author of the anti-racism thriller "Mississippi Reckoning" (2019).
After the massacre of kindergarteners at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, the gun lobby offered its usual blame-the-victims, good-guy-with-a-gun excuse: If only the teachers had been armed!
This time, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, someone did have a gun -- but the armed school resource deputy chose to hunker down outside while the mass murderer finished his work, rather than entering to confront the killer.
The now former deputy hasn't explained his failure to act. Perhaps his inaction was simply cowardice.
But this good guy with a gun might well have decided, after he heard the spray of semi-automatic weapon fire, that his handgun wasn't going to be enough to stop a killer with a high-power assault rifle.
"The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed."
Maybe he thought entering that building would be brave but suicidal.
How admirable it would have been for the deputy to lay down his life for those children. But expecting people to give their lives isn't really a plan for stopping school shootings. Telling school guards, teachers, and coaches they should be ready to engage in shoot-outs with heavily-armed killers doesn't fix the problem.
The proposal that armed citizens are the answer to armed killers is out of touch with reality. The suggestion that professional guards can do much better is equally unrealistic. Most school guards likely feel they didn't sign up for urban warfare against military hardware.
There are about 130,000 elementary, middle, and high schools in America. If every single one of them had an armed guard ready to give up his or her life, armed with their own assault rifle, the next mass killer would begin by abruptly pulling out his handgun and shooting the guard.
Does anyone really imagine that all day, every day, every guard in every school will have his or her gun at the ready?
Perhaps one regular armed guard isn't enough, then. How about a platoon of U.S. Marines at each entrance to every school? And shouldn't they have their guns drawn at all times, trained on the entering students, safeties off?
Would this make our children feel safe?
I know I'm not the only one to think there's something wrong with this picture. Most of us understand full well that more people with guns -- or engaging in an arms race with deranged killers -- isn't the answer.
The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed.
Most Americans appear to agree that stronger gun control is the answer. But that hasn't been enough to cause our government to act. Why? It's not enough to say that the NRA and its fanatical supporters are too strong.
The real problem isn't just those who regard guns as sacred. The problem is ordinary citizens who don't want assault weapons on the streets or in our schools but don't treat this as a "do-or-die" issue -- which it literally is.
While many people care, they need to care more. Maybe the activism of the survivors in Florida can change this.
If you're appalled when school children are gunned down, but not appalled enough to hold the people who enable that accountable, you're part of the problem.
Mitchell Zimmerman
Mitchell Zimmerman is an attorney, longtime social activist, and author of the anti-racism thriller "Mississippi Reckoning" (2019).
After the massacre of kindergarteners at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012, the gun lobby offered its usual blame-the-victims, good-guy-with-a-gun excuse: If only the teachers had been armed!
This time, at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, someone did have a gun -- but the armed school resource deputy chose to hunker down outside while the mass murderer finished his work, rather than entering to confront the killer.
The now former deputy hasn't explained his failure to act. Perhaps his inaction was simply cowardice.
But this good guy with a gun might well have decided, after he heard the spray of semi-automatic weapon fire, that his handgun wasn't going to be enough to stop a killer with a high-power assault rifle.
"The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed."
Maybe he thought entering that building would be brave but suicidal.
How admirable it would have been for the deputy to lay down his life for those children. But expecting people to give their lives isn't really a plan for stopping school shootings. Telling school guards, teachers, and coaches they should be ready to engage in shoot-outs with heavily-armed killers doesn't fix the problem.
The proposal that armed citizens are the answer to armed killers is out of touch with reality. The suggestion that professional guards can do much better is equally unrealistic. Most school guards likely feel they didn't sign up for urban warfare against military hardware.
There are about 130,000 elementary, middle, and high schools in America. If every single one of them had an armed guard ready to give up his or her life, armed with their own assault rifle, the next mass killer would begin by abruptly pulling out his handgun and shooting the guard.
Does anyone really imagine that all day, every day, every guard in every school will have his or her gun at the ready?
Perhaps one regular armed guard isn't enough, then. How about a platoon of U.S. Marines at each entrance to every school? And shouldn't they have their guns drawn at all times, trained on the entering students, safeties off?
Would this make our children feel safe?
I know I'm not the only one to think there's something wrong with this picture. Most of us understand full well that more people with guns -- or engaging in an arms race with deranged killers -- isn't the answer.
The answer is obvious: There is no good reason for civilians to own AR-15s or other assault weapons. Such weapons of war should be outlawed.
Most Americans appear to agree that stronger gun control is the answer. But that hasn't been enough to cause our government to act. Why? It's not enough to say that the NRA and its fanatical supporters are too strong.
The real problem isn't just those who regard guns as sacred. The problem is ordinary citizens who don't want assault weapons on the streets or in our schools but don't treat this as a "do-or-die" issue -- which it literally is.
While many people care, they need to care more. Maybe the activism of the survivors in Florida can change this.
If you're appalled when school children are gunned down, but not appalled enough to hold the people who enable that accountable, you're part of the problem.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.