"We are right to ask who is making news media for those outside of wealth and influence," Jackson writes. (Photo: Twitter/Screengrab)
The Lucky 1 Percent Get Trump's Speech, CNBC's Devotion--and Nearly All Global Growth
Would it really do CNBC's wealthy, influential viewers a disservice to consider the statement from Oxfam’s Winnie Byanyima that "the billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system"?
"The World Economic Forum is lucky to have [Donald Trump] addressing them," says CNBC host Becky Quick. Quick told industry journal TVNewser (1/22/18) that Trump's appearance in Davos, Switzerland, will make it "the perfect venue for us to get to the heart of what is powering the engine behind this amazing surge in global and domestic growth." Though she says she'll leave assigning credit to others, she allows, "It would be difficult to completely discount the instantaneous surge in the stock market that started the day after Donald Trump's election and has continued ever since."
"Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want."
Far from completely discounting it, a range of economists, like those cited in a recent AP piece (1/17/18), simply note that the state of the economy writ large is still essentially that inherited from the previous administration; and as for investment growth, economists like Dean Baker (FAIR.org, 1/2/18) have noted that not only have there been many periods in both the recent and more distant past in which it grew at a more rapid pace, it is quite concentrated in the oil and mining sector. AP even reminded dryly that as a candidate, Trump called government data like the unemployment rate "one of the biggest hoaxes in modern politics," but now presents such data as unambiguous.
As for Quick, she's only referring to corporate media's open secret when she says, in response to whether she cares about ratings: "Not at all. I pay attention to our viewers, who are the wealthiest, most influential people in the world."
Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want. And wealth and influence aren't so much condiments as the main ingredient. CNBC's function as a journalistic institution, Quick explains, is to bring that particular audience "the stories they care about": "We can't lose that focus for a second, or get caught up in the general media noise, or we do our audience a disservice."
We are right to ask who is making news media for those outside of wealth and influence. As well as whether that "general media noise" would include things like the new report from Oxfam International (1/22/18) that found that 82 percent of all wealth created in 2017 went to the top 1 percent of the world's richest people, while nothing at all--zero percent of it--went to the poorest half of the global population. Would it really do CNBC's wealthy, influential viewers a disservice to consider the statement from Oxfam's Winnie Byanyima that "the billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system"?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
"The World Economic Forum is lucky to have [Donald Trump] addressing them," says CNBC host Becky Quick. Quick told industry journal TVNewser (1/22/18) that Trump's appearance in Davos, Switzerland, will make it "the perfect venue for us to get to the heart of what is powering the engine behind this amazing surge in global and domestic growth." Though she says she'll leave assigning credit to others, she allows, "It would be difficult to completely discount the instantaneous surge in the stock market that started the day after Donald Trump's election and has continued ever since."
"Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want."
Far from completely discounting it, a range of economists, like those cited in a recent AP piece (1/17/18), simply note that the state of the economy writ large is still essentially that inherited from the previous administration; and as for investment growth, economists like Dean Baker (FAIR.org, 1/2/18) have noted that not only have there been many periods in both the recent and more distant past in which it grew at a more rapid pace, it is quite concentrated in the oil and mining sector. AP even reminded dryly that as a candidate, Trump called government data like the unemployment rate "one of the biggest hoaxes in modern politics," but now presents such data as unambiguous.
As for Quick, she's only referring to corporate media's open secret when she says, in response to whether she cares about ratings: "Not at all. I pay attention to our viewers, who are the wealthiest, most influential people in the world."
Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want. And wealth and influence aren't so much condiments as the main ingredient. CNBC's function as a journalistic institution, Quick explains, is to bring that particular audience "the stories they care about": "We can't lose that focus for a second, or get caught up in the general media noise, or we do our audience a disservice."
We are right to ask who is making news media for those outside of wealth and influence. As well as whether that "general media noise" would include things like the new report from Oxfam International (1/22/18) that found that 82 percent of all wealth created in 2017 went to the top 1 percent of the world's richest people, while nothing at all--zero percent of it--went to the poorest half of the global population. Would it really do CNBC's wealthy, influential viewers a disservice to consider the statement from Oxfam's Winnie Byanyima that "the billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system"?
"The World Economic Forum is lucky to have [Donald Trump] addressing them," says CNBC host Becky Quick. Quick told industry journal TVNewser (1/22/18) that Trump's appearance in Davos, Switzerland, will make it "the perfect venue for us to get to the heart of what is powering the engine behind this amazing surge in global and domestic growth." Though she says she'll leave assigning credit to others, she allows, "It would be difficult to completely discount the instantaneous surge in the stock market that started the day after Donald Trump's election and has continued ever since."
"Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want."
Far from completely discounting it, a range of economists, like those cited in a recent AP piece (1/17/18), simply note that the state of the economy writ large is still essentially that inherited from the previous administration; and as for investment growth, economists like Dean Baker (FAIR.org, 1/2/18) have noted that not only have there been many periods in both the recent and more distant past in which it grew at a more rapid pace, it is quite concentrated in the oil and mining sector. AP even reminded dryly that as a candidate, Trump called government data like the unemployment rate "one of the biggest hoaxes in modern politics," but now presents such data as unambiguous.
As for Quick, she's only referring to corporate media's open secret when she says, in response to whether she cares about ratings: "Not at all. I pay attention to our viewers, who are the wealthiest, most influential people in the world."
Commercial media is, of course, a system for serving corporate advertisers the audience they want. And wealth and influence aren't so much condiments as the main ingredient. CNBC's function as a journalistic institution, Quick explains, is to bring that particular audience "the stories they care about": "We can't lose that focus for a second, or get caught up in the general media noise, or we do our audience a disservice."
We are right to ask who is making news media for those outside of wealth and influence. As well as whether that "general media noise" would include things like the new report from Oxfam International (1/22/18) that found that 82 percent of all wealth created in 2017 went to the top 1 percent of the world's richest people, while nothing at all--zero percent of it--went to the poorest half of the global population. Would it really do CNBC's wealthy, influential viewers a disservice to consider the statement from Oxfam's Winnie Byanyima that "the billionaire boom is not a sign of a thriving economy but a symptom of a failing economic system"?