

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"The signs of a new universalizing are tantalizing and hopeful, for it is only through solidarity and a "movement of movements" that we will create a new system ensuring equality for women themselves as well as all people."(Photo:reid.neureiter/flickr/cc)
Hundreds of thousands of women once again took to the streets on January 20, 2018 to fire up the "resistance movement" that they helped ignite a year ago, the day after President Trump's inauguration. But while the numbers were not as large as a year ago, this second Women's March may prove to be more consequential. It is beginning to create a "universalizing resistance," one that speaks not only to the needs of women but to universal human needs.
The US Left has been seriously weakened since the 1960s by turning to a fragmented or "siloed" politics in which each "identity community" organizes separately to fight for its own members. But the problems of women, people of color, workers, and immigrants are all intertwined, all ruled by the same tiny concentration of wealthy people who run our militarized corporate system for their own benefit.
A year ago, the the Women's March turned out in huge numbers to challenge Trump's blatant sexism, symbolized by the pink pussy hats that came to define the movement. But while while some of the leading organizers spoke for women of color, immigrants and poor people, it was not clear that women were moving beyond a narrow identity politics to fight for rights of all people.
This new March was energized by the #Me Too explosion that may be a bridge to a broader feminist concern with what the actress Natalie Portman, in the LA March called "mutuality." She rejected the puritanical side of #Me Too and said to all people "let's find a space where we mutually, consensually, look out for each other's pleasure," hinting at a social change direction.
The 2018 Women's March may be igniting a new politics of solidarity and a more robust phase of "universalizing resistance." This is anti-systemic politics that sees the intertwined or "intersectional" nature of power and fights for a new system of mutuality and universal rights. Opinion polls have long shown that women are more supportive of social welfare and solidarity, one reason why feminist movements may universalize.
Here are a few clues pointing to a growing universalizing resistance:
The Huffington Post noted that the new Women's March was "an effort to work for inclusivity and intersectionality from Day 1."
Women are just starting this revolution in the Resistance, and many may stay glued to narrower identity politics. The new Women's March did not speak loudly enough about our corporate capitalism, global militarism, or climate change. Some women felt the second march had actually moved away from broader concerns about racism and social justice. But the signs of a new universalizing are tantalizing and hopeful, for it is only through solidarity and a "movement of movements" that we will create a new system ensuring equality for women themselves as well as all people.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Hundreds of thousands of women once again took to the streets on January 20, 2018 to fire up the "resistance movement" that they helped ignite a year ago, the day after President Trump's inauguration. But while the numbers were not as large as a year ago, this second Women's March may prove to be more consequential. It is beginning to create a "universalizing resistance," one that speaks not only to the needs of women but to universal human needs.
The US Left has been seriously weakened since the 1960s by turning to a fragmented or "siloed" politics in which each "identity community" organizes separately to fight for its own members. But the problems of women, people of color, workers, and immigrants are all intertwined, all ruled by the same tiny concentration of wealthy people who run our militarized corporate system for their own benefit.
A year ago, the the Women's March turned out in huge numbers to challenge Trump's blatant sexism, symbolized by the pink pussy hats that came to define the movement. But while while some of the leading organizers spoke for women of color, immigrants and poor people, it was not clear that women were moving beyond a narrow identity politics to fight for rights of all people.
This new March was energized by the #Me Too explosion that may be a bridge to a broader feminist concern with what the actress Natalie Portman, in the LA March called "mutuality." She rejected the puritanical side of #Me Too and said to all people "let's find a space where we mutually, consensually, look out for each other's pleasure," hinting at a social change direction.
The 2018 Women's March may be igniting a new politics of solidarity and a more robust phase of "universalizing resistance." This is anti-systemic politics that sees the intertwined or "intersectional" nature of power and fights for a new system of mutuality and universal rights. Opinion polls have long shown that women are more supportive of social welfare and solidarity, one reason why feminist movements may universalize.
Here are a few clues pointing to a growing universalizing resistance:
The Huffington Post noted that the new Women's March was "an effort to work for inclusivity and intersectionality from Day 1."
Women are just starting this revolution in the Resistance, and many may stay glued to narrower identity politics. The new Women's March did not speak loudly enough about our corporate capitalism, global militarism, or climate change. Some women felt the second march had actually moved away from broader concerns about racism and social justice. But the signs of a new universalizing are tantalizing and hopeful, for it is only through solidarity and a "movement of movements" that we will create a new system ensuring equality for women themselves as well as all people.
Hundreds of thousands of women once again took to the streets on January 20, 2018 to fire up the "resistance movement" that they helped ignite a year ago, the day after President Trump's inauguration. But while the numbers were not as large as a year ago, this second Women's March may prove to be more consequential. It is beginning to create a "universalizing resistance," one that speaks not only to the needs of women but to universal human needs.
The US Left has been seriously weakened since the 1960s by turning to a fragmented or "siloed" politics in which each "identity community" organizes separately to fight for its own members. But the problems of women, people of color, workers, and immigrants are all intertwined, all ruled by the same tiny concentration of wealthy people who run our militarized corporate system for their own benefit.
A year ago, the the Women's March turned out in huge numbers to challenge Trump's blatant sexism, symbolized by the pink pussy hats that came to define the movement. But while while some of the leading organizers spoke for women of color, immigrants and poor people, it was not clear that women were moving beyond a narrow identity politics to fight for rights of all people.
This new March was energized by the #Me Too explosion that may be a bridge to a broader feminist concern with what the actress Natalie Portman, in the LA March called "mutuality." She rejected the puritanical side of #Me Too and said to all people "let's find a space where we mutually, consensually, look out for each other's pleasure," hinting at a social change direction.
The 2018 Women's March may be igniting a new politics of solidarity and a more robust phase of "universalizing resistance." This is anti-systemic politics that sees the intertwined or "intersectional" nature of power and fights for a new system of mutuality and universal rights. Opinion polls have long shown that women are more supportive of social welfare and solidarity, one reason why feminist movements may universalize.
Here are a few clues pointing to a growing universalizing resistance:
The Huffington Post noted that the new Women's March was "an effort to work for inclusivity and intersectionality from Day 1."
Women are just starting this revolution in the Resistance, and many may stay glued to narrower identity politics. The new Women's March did not speak loudly enough about our corporate capitalism, global militarism, or climate change. Some women felt the second march had actually moved away from broader concerns about racism and social justice. But the signs of a new universalizing are tantalizing and hopeful, for it is only through solidarity and a "movement of movements" that we will create a new system ensuring equality for women themselves as well as all people.