SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Senator-elect Doug Jones (Photo: Justin Sullivan/ Getty)
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.