

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Senator-elect Doug Jones (Photo: Justin Sullivan/ Getty)
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
The easy thing for Republicans to tell themselves after the stinging loss of a Senate seat in Alabama is that they only went down to defeat because the party had the misfortune to nominate someone accused of preying on teenage girls.
And there is something to that. But the Republican Party nominated a man accused of sexual misconduct to run for president in 2016, and that didn't stop him from winning 62 percent of the vote in Alabama. Donald Trump didn't just win Alabama a year ago -- he won by a larger margin than Mitt Romney, John McCain, or George W. Bush. So while it's undoubtedly true that the allegations played a role in the race, they hardly work as a comprehensive explanation of the outcome.
The larger issue is that the Republican Party is led by an unpopular president and unpopular congressional leaders who are pursuing an unpopular agenda, and it's putting them in massive electoral peril.
It is entirely normal for the party that occupies the White House to lose ground down ballot during midterm elections. That said, the GOP's results in 2017 have really been quite bad:
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.
Republicans in Washington are aware of all these facts, but seem, strangely, a bit indifferent to them. The experience of watching Trump -- whom they all expected to lose as late as 7 o'clock on the evening of the 2016 election -- triumphing against the odds has them dazzled. And the fact that in office, Trump, despite considerable speculation that he wouldn't, has pursued a very orthodox Republican Party agenda has them pleased.
At the nexus of these two factors, they've decided to bank as many policy wins as they can and then hope to hit a stroke of good luck.