

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

(photo/Lorie Shaull)
Forty-seven years ago today, on Dec. 2, 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was born. Happy birthday, EPA! You're looking... well? Sadly, no. Not well at all. In fact, we're rather worried you won't make it to forty-eight. So we're fighting for your life.
By the end of the 1970's as progressive social change became mainstream, a powerful environmental movement had emerged. Activists were demanding action for what had become the near-crisis state of America's environmental health: indiscriminate use of toxic pesticides, choking air pollution, and rivers on fire. Responding to the intense pressure, Nixon--a Republican, mind you--signed an executive order to create the EPA, consolidating federal activities around environmental monitoring, standard setting, research and enforcement. While this had no budget impact, later Congresses increased the budget.
In the decades that followed, the agency, empowered to enforce benchmark environmental laws like the Clean Air and Water Acts, played a critical role in cleaning up America and protecting public health. Now, suddenly, the basic functioning of the EPA - if not the continued existence of the agency itself - is very much in doubt. Every American that breathes air, drinks water and eats food should be alarmed. After all, environmental protection isn't just about a clean planet, it's fundamentally about protecting our food and water--that is, protecting us.
Weakened environmental regulation will have a range of deep impacts on the availability of safe food and drinking water. Unfettered climate change is increasing droughts, as well as heatwaves and floods. Globally, water supplies are already stressed--and climate change will only exacerbate those stresses. The impacts on our food supply could be immense. Lloyds of London, an insurance industry giant, wrote in its report Food System Shock that the global food supply is very vulnerable to uncertain climate impacts. With a global population expected to exceed 9 billion in 2050, extreme weather linked to climate change and the accompanying spread of agricultural pests and diseases could destabilize the global food supply.
And yet, since being confirmed to lead the EPA in February, Administrator Scott Pruitt has set about dismantling the agency, piece by piece. He's doing just what he promised Donald Trump he would; just what he's been doing his entire career. Pruitt's shilling for polluting fossil fuel and chemical corporations goes back decades. He's been nothing if not consistent in his disdain for regular people and the planet.
So as it celebrates its forty-seventh birthday, the EPA is suddenly on life support. But we won't let Trump, Pruitt and their profit-driven cronies pull the plug on the EPA without a fight. We'll do whatever it takes to hold the agency and the entire administration accountable--from fighting to preserve the EPA budget, to pressuring Congress to move off fossil fuels, to simply suing the bad guys.
One way or another, we'll keep the EPA fighting and kicking in defense of our health, our safety and our planet's future. We'll make sure the EPA makes it to forty-eight, and fifty-eight, and a hundred-and-eight. We won't let the EPA down.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Forty-seven years ago today, on Dec. 2, 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was born. Happy birthday, EPA! You're looking... well? Sadly, no. Not well at all. In fact, we're rather worried you won't make it to forty-eight. So we're fighting for your life.
By the end of the 1970's as progressive social change became mainstream, a powerful environmental movement had emerged. Activists were demanding action for what had become the near-crisis state of America's environmental health: indiscriminate use of toxic pesticides, choking air pollution, and rivers on fire. Responding to the intense pressure, Nixon--a Republican, mind you--signed an executive order to create the EPA, consolidating federal activities around environmental monitoring, standard setting, research and enforcement. While this had no budget impact, later Congresses increased the budget.
In the decades that followed, the agency, empowered to enforce benchmark environmental laws like the Clean Air and Water Acts, played a critical role in cleaning up America and protecting public health. Now, suddenly, the basic functioning of the EPA - if not the continued existence of the agency itself - is very much in doubt. Every American that breathes air, drinks water and eats food should be alarmed. After all, environmental protection isn't just about a clean planet, it's fundamentally about protecting our food and water--that is, protecting us.
Weakened environmental regulation will have a range of deep impacts on the availability of safe food and drinking water. Unfettered climate change is increasing droughts, as well as heatwaves and floods. Globally, water supplies are already stressed--and climate change will only exacerbate those stresses. The impacts on our food supply could be immense. Lloyds of London, an insurance industry giant, wrote in its report Food System Shock that the global food supply is very vulnerable to uncertain climate impacts. With a global population expected to exceed 9 billion in 2050, extreme weather linked to climate change and the accompanying spread of agricultural pests and diseases could destabilize the global food supply.
And yet, since being confirmed to lead the EPA in February, Administrator Scott Pruitt has set about dismantling the agency, piece by piece. He's doing just what he promised Donald Trump he would; just what he's been doing his entire career. Pruitt's shilling for polluting fossil fuel and chemical corporations goes back decades. He's been nothing if not consistent in his disdain for regular people and the planet.
So as it celebrates its forty-seventh birthday, the EPA is suddenly on life support. But we won't let Trump, Pruitt and their profit-driven cronies pull the plug on the EPA without a fight. We'll do whatever it takes to hold the agency and the entire administration accountable--from fighting to preserve the EPA budget, to pressuring Congress to move off fossil fuels, to simply suing the bad guys.
One way or another, we'll keep the EPA fighting and kicking in defense of our health, our safety and our planet's future. We'll make sure the EPA makes it to forty-eight, and fifty-eight, and a hundred-and-eight. We won't let the EPA down.
Forty-seven years ago today, on Dec. 2, 1970, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was born. Happy birthday, EPA! You're looking... well? Sadly, no. Not well at all. In fact, we're rather worried you won't make it to forty-eight. So we're fighting for your life.
By the end of the 1970's as progressive social change became mainstream, a powerful environmental movement had emerged. Activists were demanding action for what had become the near-crisis state of America's environmental health: indiscriminate use of toxic pesticides, choking air pollution, and rivers on fire. Responding to the intense pressure, Nixon--a Republican, mind you--signed an executive order to create the EPA, consolidating federal activities around environmental monitoring, standard setting, research and enforcement. While this had no budget impact, later Congresses increased the budget.
In the decades that followed, the agency, empowered to enforce benchmark environmental laws like the Clean Air and Water Acts, played a critical role in cleaning up America and protecting public health. Now, suddenly, the basic functioning of the EPA - if not the continued existence of the agency itself - is very much in doubt. Every American that breathes air, drinks water and eats food should be alarmed. After all, environmental protection isn't just about a clean planet, it's fundamentally about protecting our food and water--that is, protecting us.
Weakened environmental regulation will have a range of deep impacts on the availability of safe food and drinking water. Unfettered climate change is increasing droughts, as well as heatwaves and floods. Globally, water supplies are already stressed--and climate change will only exacerbate those stresses. The impacts on our food supply could be immense. Lloyds of London, an insurance industry giant, wrote in its report Food System Shock that the global food supply is very vulnerable to uncertain climate impacts. With a global population expected to exceed 9 billion in 2050, extreme weather linked to climate change and the accompanying spread of agricultural pests and diseases could destabilize the global food supply.
And yet, since being confirmed to lead the EPA in February, Administrator Scott Pruitt has set about dismantling the agency, piece by piece. He's doing just what he promised Donald Trump he would; just what he's been doing his entire career. Pruitt's shilling for polluting fossil fuel and chemical corporations goes back decades. He's been nothing if not consistent in his disdain for regular people and the planet.
So as it celebrates its forty-seventh birthday, the EPA is suddenly on life support. But we won't let Trump, Pruitt and their profit-driven cronies pull the plug on the EPA without a fight. We'll do whatever it takes to hold the agency and the entire administration accountable--from fighting to preserve the EPA budget, to pressuring Congress to move off fossil fuels, to simply suing the bad guys.
One way or another, we'll keep the EPA fighting and kicking in defense of our health, our safety and our planet's future. We'll make sure the EPA makes it to forty-eight, and fifty-eight, and a hundred-and-eight. We won't let the EPA down.