President Donald Trump throwing paper towels to hurricane victims during a visit to Puerto Rico.
Oct 29, 2017
Five former U.S. presidents recently came together to raise money for hurricane relief for the victims of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. This generous, bipartisan act is one of true generosity and statesmanship.
And yet, as former presidents, all five men know that there's another way to help hurricane victims, or victims of any natural disaster. The federal government can quickly provide far more in money, personnel, and resources to help disaster victims than even the most generous outpouring of donations by Americans.
Congress recently approved $36.5 billion for disaster relief. That's nowhere near enough given the scale of the crises from California to Puerto Rico. And further funding is going to run up against a GOP plan to cut $1.5 trillion worth of taxes -- about 80 percent of which will go to the richest 1 percent.
It's a sad comment on the current state of our government, when the current president and Congress aren't doing enough to help disaster victims using the full weight and power of the federal government, so five former presidents have to cajole millions of Americans to give voluntarily.
I don't want to demean those efforts. If you gave, you did the right thing. The victims of the hurricanes no doubt need your support and appreciate your generosity.
I've got only one friend in Puerto Rico and he's relatively well off. He's a professor, and he lives in a nice home in the capital, San Juan. He has electricity and Internet, so he's been posting photos of the damage.
Enormous trees block roads. Buildings are damaged. After a month of clearing debris and attempting to clean up his own home and neighborhood, my friend is depressed. And, with electricity and internet, he's one of the lucky ones -- some 80 percent of the island still lacks power.
My heart hurts for those who are less fortunate.
As much as we complain about the federal government, it has an important role to play in natural disasters. Paying taxes is never fun, but by paying them, we can create a whole that's worth more than the sum of its parts.
If your home is incinerated by a wildfire in Montana or California, or demolished by a hurricane in Texas, Florida, or Puerto Rico, odds are you can't recover without some form of help.
The fortunate have insurance. Yet in my home of San Diego, many families who lost homes in past fires found that their insurance didn't actually cover the cost to rebuild their homes.
Ultimately, if we are to recover from natural disasters in a timely fashion -- before victims who survived the initial disaster lose their lives in the aftermath, and before children lose days of school and adults lose days at work -- we need each other. We need our government.
Ideally, we need our government for more than just disaster relief. We need it for disaster prevention. The government can buy homes from people who live in places that will repeatedly flood, allowing them to move somewhere else.
It can work to prevent catastrophic climate change so that hurricanes, wildfires, landslides, and other disasters don't become more severe or more common.
Individual, voluntary efforts are great, and they produce needed relief for disaster victims. But we need something more.
Those five former presidents could probably make a much bigger impact if they joined forces to lobby Congress and the White House to fully fund disaster recovery efforts and to then take the action needed to prevent these disasters from becoming more common.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just hours away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This column was distributed by OtherWords.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
Five former U.S. presidents recently came together to raise money for hurricane relief for the victims of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. This generous, bipartisan act is one of true generosity and statesmanship.
And yet, as former presidents, all five men know that there's another way to help hurricane victims, or victims of any natural disaster. The federal government can quickly provide far more in money, personnel, and resources to help disaster victims than even the most generous outpouring of donations by Americans.
Congress recently approved $36.5 billion for disaster relief. That's nowhere near enough given the scale of the crises from California to Puerto Rico. And further funding is going to run up against a GOP plan to cut $1.5 trillion worth of taxes -- about 80 percent of which will go to the richest 1 percent.
It's a sad comment on the current state of our government, when the current president and Congress aren't doing enough to help disaster victims using the full weight and power of the federal government, so five former presidents have to cajole millions of Americans to give voluntarily.
I don't want to demean those efforts. If you gave, you did the right thing. The victims of the hurricanes no doubt need your support and appreciate your generosity.
I've got only one friend in Puerto Rico and he's relatively well off. He's a professor, and he lives in a nice home in the capital, San Juan. He has electricity and Internet, so he's been posting photos of the damage.
Enormous trees block roads. Buildings are damaged. After a month of clearing debris and attempting to clean up his own home and neighborhood, my friend is depressed. And, with electricity and internet, he's one of the lucky ones -- some 80 percent of the island still lacks power.
My heart hurts for those who are less fortunate.
As much as we complain about the federal government, it has an important role to play in natural disasters. Paying taxes is never fun, but by paying them, we can create a whole that's worth more than the sum of its parts.
If your home is incinerated by a wildfire in Montana or California, or demolished by a hurricane in Texas, Florida, or Puerto Rico, odds are you can't recover without some form of help.
The fortunate have insurance. Yet in my home of San Diego, many families who lost homes in past fires found that their insurance didn't actually cover the cost to rebuild their homes.
Ultimately, if we are to recover from natural disasters in a timely fashion -- before victims who survived the initial disaster lose their lives in the aftermath, and before children lose days of school and adults lose days at work -- we need each other. We need our government.
Ideally, we need our government for more than just disaster relief. We need it for disaster prevention. The government can buy homes from people who live in places that will repeatedly flood, allowing them to move somewhere else.
It can work to prevent catastrophic climate change so that hurricanes, wildfires, landslides, and other disasters don't become more severe or more common.
Individual, voluntary efforts are great, and they produce needed relief for disaster victims. But we need something more.
Those five former presidents could probably make a much bigger impact if they joined forces to lobby Congress and the White House to fully fund disaster recovery efforts and to then take the action needed to prevent these disasters from becoming more common.
Jill Richardson
Jill Richardson is pursuing a PhD in sociology at UW-Madison, where she studies natural resources and the environment.
Five former U.S. presidents recently came together to raise money for hurricane relief for the victims of hurricanes Harvey, Irma, and Maria. This generous, bipartisan act is one of true generosity and statesmanship.
And yet, as former presidents, all five men know that there's another way to help hurricane victims, or victims of any natural disaster. The federal government can quickly provide far more in money, personnel, and resources to help disaster victims than even the most generous outpouring of donations by Americans.
Congress recently approved $36.5 billion for disaster relief. That's nowhere near enough given the scale of the crises from California to Puerto Rico. And further funding is going to run up against a GOP plan to cut $1.5 trillion worth of taxes -- about 80 percent of which will go to the richest 1 percent.
It's a sad comment on the current state of our government, when the current president and Congress aren't doing enough to help disaster victims using the full weight and power of the federal government, so five former presidents have to cajole millions of Americans to give voluntarily.
I don't want to demean those efforts. If you gave, you did the right thing. The victims of the hurricanes no doubt need your support and appreciate your generosity.
I've got only one friend in Puerto Rico and he's relatively well off. He's a professor, and he lives in a nice home in the capital, San Juan. He has electricity and Internet, so he's been posting photos of the damage.
Enormous trees block roads. Buildings are damaged. After a month of clearing debris and attempting to clean up his own home and neighborhood, my friend is depressed. And, with electricity and internet, he's one of the lucky ones -- some 80 percent of the island still lacks power.
My heart hurts for those who are less fortunate.
As much as we complain about the federal government, it has an important role to play in natural disasters. Paying taxes is never fun, but by paying them, we can create a whole that's worth more than the sum of its parts.
If your home is incinerated by a wildfire in Montana or California, or demolished by a hurricane in Texas, Florida, or Puerto Rico, odds are you can't recover without some form of help.
The fortunate have insurance. Yet in my home of San Diego, many families who lost homes in past fires found that their insurance didn't actually cover the cost to rebuild their homes.
Ultimately, if we are to recover from natural disasters in a timely fashion -- before victims who survived the initial disaster lose their lives in the aftermath, and before children lose days of school and adults lose days at work -- we need each other. We need our government.
Ideally, we need our government for more than just disaster relief. We need it for disaster prevention. The government can buy homes from people who live in places that will repeatedly flood, allowing them to move somewhere else.
It can work to prevent catastrophic climate change so that hurricanes, wildfires, landslides, and other disasters don't become more severe or more common.
Individual, voluntary efforts are great, and they produce needed relief for disaster victims. But we need something more.
Those five former presidents could probably make a much bigger impact if they joined forces to lobby Congress and the White House to fully fund disaster recovery efforts and to then take the action needed to prevent these disasters from becoming more common.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.