The Trump administration's vote-fraud commission has been accused of trying to suppress the votes of African Americans and other minorities. (Photo: Associated Press)
For Republicans, Fear and Loathing is a Winning Message
A little context is critical here.
It would be too easy to dismiss Donald Trump's Commission on Electoral Integrity as superfluous evidence of the intellectual erosion of the Republican Party. As a Twitter observer who styles himself LOLGOP quipped last week when the commission held its first meeting: "All the evidence in the world won't get the GOP to accept climate change but no evidence is necessary to stop black people from voting."
A little context is critical here.
It would be too easy to dismiss Donald Trump's Commission on Electoral Integrity as superfluous evidence of the intellectual erosion of the Republican Party. As a Twitter observer who styles himself LOLGOP quipped last week when the commission held its first meeting: "All the evidence in the world won't get the GOP to accept climate change but no evidence is necessary to stop black people from voting."
And yes, the hypocrisy is staggering. Scientific consensus, Miami Beach flooding, record heat and a chunk of ice the size of Delaware breaking off the Antarctic ice shelf are not enough to convince President Dumpster Fire and his party to get serious about climate change. Meantime, a few dubious anecdotes of voting irregularities gets us a presidential commission furrowing its brows over a "problem" that does not exist.
But the truth is, hypocritical is the least bad thing this is. Which brings us back to context.
Consider, for instance, the rise over the last 10 years of photo ID laws, putatively designed to keep ineligible people from voting. Never mind that this happens only slightly more frequently than Darth Vader dances the macarena. Never mind, too, the alarms raised by observers who point out that poor people are less likely to have -- or be readily able to obtain -- such IDs.
Further context is found in the Supreme Court's 2013 evisceration of the Voting Rights Act. The VRA, enacted to fight the systematic denial of the ballot to African-American voters, required states that had engaged in this practice to get federal permission before changing their election laws. The Republican appointees on the court united to strike this provision down.
Still more context: the ongoing resistance in Republican states like Florida, Kentucky, and Iowa to allowing ex-felons to vote. Mind you, having once served time does not exempt you from a duty to pay taxes, but in many places, it does rob you of the right to have a say in how those taxes are spent.
It is no mystery who these and other restrictions are designed to hurt. After all, the populations most likely to be affected, including African Americans and the poor, are those most likely to vote for Democrats. But if deductive reasoning is not enough to sway you, there's also the fact that a Republican is occasionally impolitic enough to admit the chicanery outright.
As in a party official from North Carolina who bragged in 2013 that the state's photo ID law would keep "lazy blacks" and others from voting. "The law is going to kick the Democrats in the butt," Don Yelton told "The Daily Show."
In a sense, you can't fault Republicans for this. The GOP is built on appealing to the anger and resentment of older, straight, white, Christian voters.
What do you expect the party to do when faced with a rising electorate of rainbow colors, ages, religious philosophies, and sexual identities? Change? Broaden? Be serious.
It is only mildly hyperbolic to describe what is happening here as a soft coup -- the theft of legitimate power by illegitimate means. The GOP has inflicted calculated violence on a core American creed that says we all have a voice and all our voices deserve to be heard.
Apparently, that's something Republicans no longer believe. And this new panel cannot help but have a chilling effect on non-GOP voters -- precisely what it is intended to do. Too bad the party is not serious about ferreting out threats to the integrity of our elections.
It would not have to look far.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A little context is critical here.
It would be too easy to dismiss Donald Trump's Commission on Electoral Integrity as superfluous evidence of the intellectual erosion of the Republican Party. As a Twitter observer who styles himself LOLGOP quipped last week when the commission held its first meeting: "All the evidence in the world won't get the GOP to accept climate change but no evidence is necessary to stop black people from voting."
And yes, the hypocrisy is staggering. Scientific consensus, Miami Beach flooding, record heat and a chunk of ice the size of Delaware breaking off the Antarctic ice shelf are not enough to convince President Dumpster Fire and his party to get serious about climate change. Meantime, a few dubious anecdotes of voting irregularities gets us a presidential commission furrowing its brows over a "problem" that does not exist.
But the truth is, hypocritical is the least bad thing this is. Which brings us back to context.
Consider, for instance, the rise over the last 10 years of photo ID laws, putatively designed to keep ineligible people from voting. Never mind that this happens only slightly more frequently than Darth Vader dances the macarena. Never mind, too, the alarms raised by observers who point out that poor people are less likely to have -- or be readily able to obtain -- such IDs.
Further context is found in the Supreme Court's 2013 evisceration of the Voting Rights Act. The VRA, enacted to fight the systematic denial of the ballot to African-American voters, required states that had engaged in this practice to get federal permission before changing their election laws. The Republican appointees on the court united to strike this provision down.
Still more context: the ongoing resistance in Republican states like Florida, Kentucky, and Iowa to allowing ex-felons to vote. Mind you, having once served time does not exempt you from a duty to pay taxes, but in many places, it does rob you of the right to have a say in how those taxes are spent.
It is no mystery who these and other restrictions are designed to hurt. After all, the populations most likely to be affected, including African Americans and the poor, are those most likely to vote for Democrats. But if deductive reasoning is not enough to sway you, there's also the fact that a Republican is occasionally impolitic enough to admit the chicanery outright.
As in a party official from North Carolina who bragged in 2013 that the state's photo ID law would keep "lazy blacks" and others from voting. "The law is going to kick the Democrats in the butt," Don Yelton told "The Daily Show."
In a sense, you can't fault Republicans for this. The GOP is built on appealing to the anger and resentment of older, straight, white, Christian voters.
What do you expect the party to do when faced with a rising electorate of rainbow colors, ages, religious philosophies, and sexual identities? Change? Broaden? Be serious.
It is only mildly hyperbolic to describe what is happening here as a soft coup -- the theft of legitimate power by illegitimate means. The GOP has inflicted calculated violence on a core American creed that says we all have a voice and all our voices deserve to be heard.
Apparently, that's something Republicans no longer believe. And this new panel cannot help but have a chilling effect on non-GOP voters -- precisely what it is intended to do. Too bad the party is not serious about ferreting out threats to the integrity of our elections.
It would not have to look far.
A little context is critical here.
It would be too easy to dismiss Donald Trump's Commission on Electoral Integrity as superfluous evidence of the intellectual erosion of the Republican Party. As a Twitter observer who styles himself LOLGOP quipped last week when the commission held its first meeting: "All the evidence in the world won't get the GOP to accept climate change but no evidence is necessary to stop black people from voting."
And yes, the hypocrisy is staggering. Scientific consensus, Miami Beach flooding, record heat and a chunk of ice the size of Delaware breaking off the Antarctic ice shelf are not enough to convince President Dumpster Fire and his party to get serious about climate change. Meantime, a few dubious anecdotes of voting irregularities gets us a presidential commission furrowing its brows over a "problem" that does not exist.
But the truth is, hypocritical is the least bad thing this is. Which brings us back to context.
Consider, for instance, the rise over the last 10 years of photo ID laws, putatively designed to keep ineligible people from voting. Never mind that this happens only slightly more frequently than Darth Vader dances the macarena. Never mind, too, the alarms raised by observers who point out that poor people are less likely to have -- or be readily able to obtain -- such IDs.
Further context is found in the Supreme Court's 2013 evisceration of the Voting Rights Act. The VRA, enacted to fight the systematic denial of the ballot to African-American voters, required states that had engaged in this practice to get federal permission before changing their election laws. The Republican appointees on the court united to strike this provision down.
Still more context: the ongoing resistance in Republican states like Florida, Kentucky, and Iowa to allowing ex-felons to vote. Mind you, having once served time does not exempt you from a duty to pay taxes, but in many places, it does rob you of the right to have a say in how those taxes are spent.
It is no mystery who these and other restrictions are designed to hurt. After all, the populations most likely to be affected, including African Americans and the poor, are those most likely to vote for Democrats. But if deductive reasoning is not enough to sway you, there's also the fact that a Republican is occasionally impolitic enough to admit the chicanery outright.
As in a party official from North Carolina who bragged in 2013 that the state's photo ID law would keep "lazy blacks" and others from voting. "The law is going to kick the Democrats in the butt," Don Yelton told "The Daily Show."
In a sense, you can't fault Republicans for this. The GOP is built on appealing to the anger and resentment of older, straight, white, Christian voters.
What do you expect the party to do when faced with a rising electorate of rainbow colors, ages, religious philosophies, and sexual identities? Change? Broaden? Be serious.
It is only mildly hyperbolic to describe what is happening here as a soft coup -- the theft of legitimate power by illegitimate means. The GOP has inflicted calculated violence on a core American creed that says we all have a voice and all our voices deserve to be heard.
Apparently, that's something Republicans no longer believe. And this new panel cannot help but have a chilling effect on non-GOP voters -- precisely what it is intended to do. Too bad the party is not serious about ferreting out threats to the integrity of our elections.
It would not have to look far.