"It just makes official what has been US policy since 9/11, which is that there will be no notice taken of war crimes because so many of them were being committed by our own allies, our military and intelligence officers and our elected officials." (Photo: Matthew Peoples/ flickr CC 2.0)
Have We Found a Cure for the Atrocities of War?
Human rights advocates were shocked when Foreign Policy reported that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson might close the department’s war crimes office.
The United States has a long history of noncooperation with international legal entities. For example, America is not a member of the International Criminal Court. Add to that the fact that President Trump has not been shy about his "America First" style of foreign relations. But this week, human rights advocates and State Department watchers were shocked when Foreign Policy broke the story that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was poised to shut the Department's war crimes office.
It's another example of the "streamlining" of government agencies advocated by the Trump administration -- in part necessitated by budget cuts. The Office of Global Criminal Justice, as it is formally known, has a small staff of about a dozen employees and an annual budget of only $3 million. But the State Department has been asked to cut its budget by 31 percent.
The office may have been especially vulnerable because it is one of those run by an envoy who is appointed by the president, not career staff. Stephen J. Rapp, who headed the office under President Obama, has already been reassigned to other duties. Rapp was well experienced in international criminal justice systems -- he served on tribunals for Rwanda and Sierra Leone. During his tenure he arranged for an important Syrian defector to provide photographic evidence of FBI detainees in al-Assad's prisons. According to The New York Times, Rapp also pushed Kosovo leadership to accept its human rights tribunal and for Senegal's prosecution of Hissene Habre, the former dictator of Chad.
But human rights advocates aren't buying the budgetary excuse. Nina Burleigh at Newsweek has more on the story:
"It just makes official what has been US policy since 9/11, which is that there will be no notice taken of war crimes because so many of them were being committed by our own allies, our military and intelligence officers and our elected officials," Maj. Todd E. Pierce, a former judge advocate general defense attorney at Guantanamo, told Newsweek. "The war crime of conspiring and waging aggressive war still exists, as torture, denial of fair trial rights, and indefinite detention are war crimes. But how embarrassing and revealing of hypocrisy would it be to charge a foreign official with war crimes such as these? That's not to defend the closing of this office but to lament that is has been rendered irrelevant."
Amherst College law professor Lawrence Douglas, a war crimes expert, said the plan "should be a source of deep regret domestically and cause for grave concern abroad. The closing makes a powerful statement -- that the Trump administration cares little about the protection of human rights and nothing about the vital work of international criminal courts. Perpetrators of atrocities the world over will, however, be pleased."
Efraim Zuroff of Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, which tracks Nazi war criminals, told Newsweek the State Department's decision sends the wrong message to victims and perpetrators around the world. "War crimes are now happening all over the world, as you know. Prosecuting them is not the job only of the United States, but to close this office will not help to bring justice," he said. ...
The office was formed following the 1996 passage of the War Crimes Act, which defined a war crime as a "grave breach" of the Geneva Conventions. When the CIA began using torture early in the Iraq War and, later, jailing people indefinitely and without trial in Guantanamo, the US was in open breach of the conventions.
The War Crimes Act is applicable to both foreign and US individuals, including US military and intelligence officials, but civil claims brought by victims against US officials over the last 10 years "for what are undisputed war crimes," according to former US Army Judge Advocate General Maj. Todd Pierce, have routinely been tossed out on the grounds that the accused were "acting within the scope of their employment." Pierce compared that defense to "the latest version of the Nuremberg defense of 'I was just following orders.' Closing this office dispenses with any lingering hypocrisy that we care to hold war criminals accountable for their acts."
The State Department would neither confirm or deny the shuttering of the office but emailed this statement Newsweek: "The State Department is currently undergoing an employee-led redesign initiative, and there are no predetermined outcomes. During this process, we are committed to ensuring the Department is addressing such issues in the most effective and efficient way possible. We are not going to get ahead of any potential outcomes."
In the meantime, policy wonks and rights advocates fear that the mere discussion of closing the office sends the wrong message about US justice to the world.
Read more installments in our series "While He Was Tweeting" -- keeping an eye on Trump's wrecking ball.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The United States has a long history of noncooperation with international legal entities. For example, America is not a member of the International Criminal Court. Add to that the fact that President Trump has not been shy about his "America First" style of foreign relations. But this week, human rights advocates and State Department watchers were shocked when Foreign Policy broke the story that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was poised to shut the Department's war crimes office.
It's another example of the "streamlining" of government agencies advocated by the Trump administration -- in part necessitated by budget cuts. The Office of Global Criminal Justice, as it is formally known, has a small staff of about a dozen employees and an annual budget of only $3 million. But the State Department has been asked to cut its budget by 31 percent.
The office may have been especially vulnerable because it is one of those run by an envoy who is appointed by the president, not career staff. Stephen J. Rapp, who headed the office under President Obama, has already been reassigned to other duties. Rapp was well experienced in international criminal justice systems -- he served on tribunals for Rwanda and Sierra Leone. During his tenure he arranged for an important Syrian defector to provide photographic evidence of FBI detainees in al-Assad's prisons. According to The New York Times, Rapp also pushed Kosovo leadership to accept its human rights tribunal and for Senegal's prosecution of Hissene Habre, the former dictator of Chad.
But human rights advocates aren't buying the budgetary excuse. Nina Burleigh at Newsweek has more on the story:
"It just makes official what has been US policy since 9/11, which is that there will be no notice taken of war crimes because so many of them were being committed by our own allies, our military and intelligence officers and our elected officials," Maj. Todd E. Pierce, a former judge advocate general defense attorney at Guantanamo, told Newsweek. "The war crime of conspiring and waging aggressive war still exists, as torture, denial of fair trial rights, and indefinite detention are war crimes. But how embarrassing and revealing of hypocrisy would it be to charge a foreign official with war crimes such as these? That's not to defend the closing of this office but to lament that is has been rendered irrelevant."
Amherst College law professor Lawrence Douglas, a war crimes expert, said the plan "should be a source of deep regret domestically and cause for grave concern abroad. The closing makes a powerful statement -- that the Trump administration cares little about the protection of human rights and nothing about the vital work of international criminal courts. Perpetrators of atrocities the world over will, however, be pleased."
Efraim Zuroff of Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, which tracks Nazi war criminals, told Newsweek the State Department's decision sends the wrong message to victims and perpetrators around the world. "War crimes are now happening all over the world, as you know. Prosecuting them is not the job only of the United States, but to close this office will not help to bring justice," he said. ...
The office was formed following the 1996 passage of the War Crimes Act, which defined a war crime as a "grave breach" of the Geneva Conventions. When the CIA began using torture early in the Iraq War and, later, jailing people indefinitely and without trial in Guantanamo, the US was in open breach of the conventions.
The War Crimes Act is applicable to both foreign and US individuals, including US military and intelligence officials, but civil claims brought by victims against US officials over the last 10 years "for what are undisputed war crimes," according to former US Army Judge Advocate General Maj. Todd Pierce, have routinely been tossed out on the grounds that the accused were "acting within the scope of their employment." Pierce compared that defense to "the latest version of the Nuremberg defense of 'I was just following orders.' Closing this office dispenses with any lingering hypocrisy that we care to hold war criminals accountable for their acts."
The State Department would neither confirm or deny the shuttering of the office but emailed this statement Newsweek: "The State Department is currently undergoing an employee-led redesign initiative, and there are no predetermined outcomes. During this process, we are committed to ensuring the Department is addressing such issues in the most effective and efficient way possible. We are not going to get ahead of any potential outcomes."
In the meantime, policy wonks and rights advocates fear that the mere discussion of closing the office sends the wrong message about US justice to the world.
Read more installments in our series "While He Was Tweeting" -- keeping an eye on Trump's wrecking ball.
The United States has a long history of noncooperation with international legal entities. For example, America is not a member of the International Criminal Court. Add to that the fact that President Trump has not been shy about his "America First" style of foreign relations. But this week, human rights advocates and State Department watchers were shocked when Foreign Policy broke the story that Secretary of State Rex Tillerson was poised to shut the Department's war crimes office.
It's another example of the "streamlining" of government agencies advocated by the Trump administration -- in part necessitated by budget cuts. The Office of Global Criminal Justice, as it is formally known, has a small staff of about a dozen employees and an annual budget of only $3 million. But the State Department has been asked to cut its budget by 31 percent.
The office may have been especially vulnerable because it is one of those run by an envoy who is appointed by the president, not career staff. Stephen J. Rapp, who headed the office under President Obama, has already been reassigned to other duties. Rapp was well experienced in international criminal justice systems -- he served on tribunals for Rwanda and Sierra Leone. During his tenure he arranged for an important Syrian defector to provide photographic evidence of FBI detainees in al-Assad's prisons. According to The New York Times, Rapp also pushed Kosovo leadership to accept its human rights tribunal and for Senegal's prosecution of Hissene Habre, the former dictator of Chad.
But human rights advocates aren't buying the budgetary excuse. Nina Burleigh at Newsweek has more on the story:
"It just makes official what has been US policy since 9/11, which is that there will be no notice taken of war crimes because so many of them were being committed by our own allies, our military and intelligence officers and our elected officials," Maj. Todd E. Pierce, a former judge advocate general defense attorney at Guantanamo, told Newsweek. "The war crime of conspiring and waging aggressive war still exists, as torture, denial of fair trial rights, and indefinite detention are war crimes. But how embarrassing and revealing of hypocrisy would it be to charge a foreign official with war crimes such as these? That's not to defend the closing of this office but to lament that is has been rendered irrelevant."
Amherst College law professor Lawrence Douglas, a war crimes expert, said the plan "should be a source of deep regret domestically and cause for grave concern abroad. The closing makes a powerful statement -- that the Trump administration cares little about the protection of human rights and nothing about the vital work of international criminal courts. Perpetrators of atrocities the world over will, however, be pleased."
Efraim Zuroff of Simon Wiesenthal Center's Israel office, which tracks Nazi war criminals, told Newsweek the State Department's decision sends the wrong message to victims and perpetrators around the world. "War crimes are now happening all over the world, as you know. Prosecuting them is not the job only of the United States, but to close this office will not help to bring justice," he said. ...
The office was formed following the 1996 passage of the War Crimes Act, which defined a war crime as a "grave breach" of the Geneva Conventions. When the CIA began using torture early in the Iraq War and, later, jailing people indefinitely and without trial in Guantanamo, the US was in open breach of the conventions.
The War Crimes Act is applicable to both foreign and US individuals, including US military and intelligence officials, but civil claims brought by victims against US officials over the last 10 years "for what are undisputed war crimes," according to former US Army Judge Advocate General Maj. Todd Pierce, have routinely been tossed out on the grounds that the accused were "acting within the scope of their employment." Pierce compared that defense to "the latest version of the Nuremberg defense of 'I was just following orders.' Closing this office dispenses with any lingering hypocrisy that we care to hold war criminals accountable for their acts."
The State Department would neither confirm or deny the shuttering of the office but emailed this statement Newsweek: "The State Department is currently undergoing an employee-led redesign initiative, and there are no predetermined outcomes. During this process, we are committed to ensuring the Department is addressing such issues in the most effective and efficient way possible. We are not going to get ahead of any potential outcomes."
In the meantime, policy wonks and rights advocates fear that the mere discussion of closing the office sends the wrong message about US justice to the world.
Read more installments in our series "While He Was Tweeting" -- keeping an eye on Trump's wrecking ball.