SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
When Will Exxon Be Worthless? Not If.
These are dizzying days. Our best advice is to stay woke, and pay attention. As we prepare for a day that will revolve around Trump's Rose Garden speech to Make America Guzzle&Gush Again, it is worth taking a moment to focus on the amazing events in the background over the last few days:
Jun 01, 2017
These are dizzying days. Our best advice is to stay woke, and pay attention. As we prepare for a day that will revolve around Trump's Rose Garden speech to Make America Guzzle&Gush Again, it is worth taking a moment to focus on the amazing events in the background over the last few days:
- Kinder Morgan's Transmountain tar sands pipeline got politically flattened when the province of British Columbia elected the social democrats and the greens on their promise to kill the project;
- China and Europe lept out of the gate announcing major new joint cooperation to take climate ambition to a new level in response to reports that denier-in-chief Trump is pulling out of the Paris agreement. A veritable "we won't hesitate to leave you behind" was the message resonating around the world shortly after the news dropped;
- The cautious, conservative, Financial Times trumpeted the "unstoppability" of renewables and the end of fossil fuels; and
- ExxonMobil shareholders - lead by mainstream investment firms - voted decisively to demand the company disclose the risks of its massive fossil fuel reserves to the climate.
And this is just a sampling of what is becoming a very clear picture of a world that is changing faster than most can keep up with.
Vote by Exxon shareholders "is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil."
Let's take a closer look at the ExxonMobil vote. To be clear, Exxon still hates your children, but now their shareholders are demanding that they stop lying about it. Investors voted with an astounding 62.3% majority to require the fossil fuel giant disclose the impacts their massive oil reserves will have on the climate.
Just as groundbreaking is that the measure was reportedly supported by some of the world's biggest financial firms: BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. When firms like these start to come around, you can be pretty sure the tide is turning.
In addition to getting slammed on this vote (in spite of the company urging its shareholders to reject the resolution) ExxonMobil is also facing a suite of lawsuits at various levels (including by multiple Attorney Generals') on its history of lies and deception covering up and discrediting climate science. The climate bad guys aren't lurking in the shadows anymore, they have been pushed into plain sight and in response, investors are revolting, courts are pouncing, and people are finally starting to see past the spin.
It is important to note that acting on this resolution will come nowhere near to making Exxon a climate good-guy. They are not the first to deal with this shareholder demand, and those who have come before them have found ways of pulling rabbits out of hats by making in-house models work to show that their oil will somehow survive in a world that needs to decarbonize.
The bottom line is that Big Oil doesn't have a future in a carbon-constrained world that stays within safe climate limits. This reality is a much tougher pill to swallow, but this is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil. It is our job to push them to get there faster. After all, a worthless Exxon is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when, and no one is going to want to go down with that sinking ship.
(with thanks to Hannah McKinnon for her contributions)
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Stephen Kretzmann
Stephen Kretzmann is founder and executive director and founder of Oil Change International.
These are dizzying days. Our best advice is to stay woke, and pay attention. As we prepare for a day that will revolve around Trump's Rose Garden speech to Make America Guzzle&Gush Again, it is worth taking a moment to focus on the amazing events in the background over the last few days:
- Kinder Morgan's Transmountain tar sands pipeline got politically flattened when the province of British Columbia elected the social democrats and the greens on their promise to kill the project;
- China and Europe lept out of the gate announcing major new joint cooperation to take climate ambition to a new level in response to reports that denier-in-chief Trump is pulling out of the Paris agreement. A veritable "we won't hesitate to leave you behind" was the message resonating around the world shortly after the news dropped;
- The cautious, conservative, Financial Times trumpeted the "unstoppability" of renewables and the end of fossil fuels; and
- ExxonMobil shareholders - lead by mainstream investment firms - voted decisively to demand the company disclose the risks of its massive fossil fuel reserves to the climate.
And this is just a sampling of what is becoming a very clear picture of a world that is changing faster than most can keep up with.
Vote by Exxon shareholders "is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil."
Let's take a closer look at the ExxonMobil vote. To be clear, Exxon still hates your children, but now their shareholders are demanding that they stop lying about it. Investors voted with an astounding 62.3% majority to require the fossil fuel giant disclose the impacts their massive oil reserves will have on the climate.
Just as groundbreaking is that the measure was reportedly supported by some of the world's biggest financial firms: BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. When firms like these start to come around, you can be pretty sure the tide is turning.
In addition to getting slammed on this vote (in spite of the company urging its shareholders to reject the resolution) ExxonMobil is also facing a suite of lawsuits at various levels (including by multiple Attorney Generals') on its history of lies and deception covering up and discrediting climate science. The climate bad guys aren't lurking in the shadows anymore, they have been pushed into plain sight and in response, investors are revolting, courts are pouncing, and people are finally starting to see past the spin.
It is important to note that acting on this resolution will come nowhere near to making Exxon a climate good-guy. They are not the first to deal with this shareholder demand, and those who have come before them have found ways of pulling rabbits out of hats by making in-house models work to show that their oil will somehow survive in a world that needs to decarbonize.
The bottom line is that Big Oil doesn't have a future in a carbon-constrained world that stays within safe climate limits. This reality is a much tougher pill to swallow, but this is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil. It is our job to push them to get there faster. After all, a worthless Exxon is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when, and no one is going to want to go down with that sinking ship.
(with thanks to Hannah McKinnon for her contributions)
Stephen Kretzmann
Stephen Kretzmann is founder and executive director and founder of Oil Change International.
These are dizzying days. Our best advice is to stay woke, and pay attention. As we prepare for a day that will revolve around Trump's Rose Garden speech to Make America Guzzle&Gush Again, it is worth taking a moment to focus on the amazing events in the background over the last few days:
- Kinder Morgan's Transmountain tar sands pipeline got politically flattened when the province of British Columbia elected the social democrats and the greens on their promise to kill the project;
- China and Europe lept out of the gate announcing major new joint cooperation to take climate ambition to a new level in response to reports that denier-in-chief Trump is pulling out of the Paris agreement. A veritable "we won't hesitate to leave you behind" was the message resonating around the world shortly after the news dropped;
- The cautious, conservative, Financial Times trumpeted the "unstoppability" of renewables and the end of fossil fuels; and
- ExxonMobil shareholders - lead by mainstream investment firms - voted decisively to demand the company disclose the risks of its massive fossil fuel reserves to the climate.
And this is just a sampling of what is becoming a very clear picture of a world that is changing faster than most can keep up with.
Vote by Exxon shareholders "is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil."
Let's take a closer look at the ExxonMobil vote. To be clear, Exxon still hates your children, but now their shareholders are demanding that they stop lying about it. Investors voted with an astounding 62.3% majority to require the fossil fuel giant disclose the impacts their massive oil reserves will have on the climate.
Just as groundbreaking is that the measure was reportedly supported by some of the world's biggest financial firms: BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street. When firms like these start to come around, you can be pretty sure the tide is turning.
In addition to getting slammed on this vote (in spite of the company urging its shareholders to reject the resolution) ExxonMobil is also facing a suite of lawsuits at various levels (including by multiple Attorney Generals') on its history of lies and deception covering up and discrediting climate science. The climate bad guys aren't lurking in the shadows anymore, they have been pushed into plain sight and in response, investors are revolting, courts are pouncing, and people are finally starting to see past the spin.
It is important to note that acting on this resolution will come nowhere near to making Exxon a climate good-guy. They are not the first to deal with this shareholder demand, and those who have come before them have found ways of pulling rabbits out of hats by making in-house models work to show that their oil will somehow survive in a world that needs to decarbonize.
The bottom line is that Big Oil doesn't have a future in a carbon-constrained world that stays within safe climate limits. This reality is a much tougher pill to swallow, but this is a striking example that the mainstream financial world is getting closer to a meaningful understanding of the end of oil. It is our job to push them to get there faster. After all, a worthless Exxon is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when, and no one is going to want to go down with that sinking ship.
(with thanks to Hannah McKinnon for her contributions)
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.