SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'This president's first hundred days have seen no progress in 'draining the swamp;' instead, they have been the most corrupt in our national history.' (Image: Common Cause)
'State of the Swamp' Spotlights Trump Team's Ethical Blindness
President Trump marks his 100th day in office on Saturday, a milestone he insists is meaningless even as he directs the White House staff in a frenzied effort to convince Americans he's been the most successful president ever.
The approach of Day 100 has sparked news organizations, watchdog groups, lobbyists, political partisans, and heaven-only-knows-who-else to publish their own assessments of Trump's performance. A thorough review of the reviews probably would take the careful reader another 100 days.
Apr 28, 2017
President Trump marks his 100th day in office on Saturday, a milestone he insists is meaningless even as he directs the White House staff in a frenzied effort to convince Americans he's been the most successful president ever.
The approach of Day 100 has sparked news organizations, watchdog groups, lobbyists, political partisans, and heaven-only-knows-who-else to publish their own assessments of Trump's performance. A thorough review of the reviews probably would take the careful reader another 100 days.
So let me help. Around here, we're partial to "State of the Swamp," a 20-page report put together principally by Joe Maschman, a Common Cause legal fellow, and released this week. It's an easy and important, if sometimes depressing read, that catalogs the Trump team's ethical and in some cases, legal shortfalls.
The report also includes a slate of recommendations, crafted to keep future presidents from following Trump's bad example. They include:
- Required disclosure of at least five years of federal tax returns by major party candidates for president and vice president, in order to give the voting public information regarding such candidates' personal finances and potential conflicts of interest;
- Strengthened personal financial disclosure requirements, see 5 U.S.C. app. SSSS 101-111, to require president and vice president to disclose more detailed information regarding income and debt;
- Required disclosure of White House visitor logs and visitor logs of other venues where the president regularly conducts business (e.g., H.R.1711 / S.721, MAR-A-LAGO Act);
- Required electronic public disclosure via the White House website of ethics agreements signed by Executive Branch political appointees, and any waivers granted by the White House to the signing of such agreements;
- Strengthened "revolving door" lobbying restrictions for political appointees both entering and leaving Executive Branch employment; and
- Requiring the president and vice president to place all assets that create conflicts of interest into a blind trust managed by an independent trustee who oversees the conversion of the assets into conflict-free holdings (e.g., H.R.371 / S.65, Presidential Conflicts of Interest Act of 2017).
A passage near the end sums the report up. "TR had the Square Deal, FDR the New Deal; Trump prefers to self-deal. This president's first hundred days have seen no progress in 'draining the swamp;' instead, they have been the most corrupt in our national history."
We hope you'll check it out and then take it to heart. This is still OUR government and the Trump team are OUR employees. It's up to us to bring them back in line.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Trump marks his 100th day in office on Saturday, a milestone he insists is meaningless even as he directs the White House staff in a frenzied effort to convince Americans he's been the most successful president ever.
The approach of Day 100 has sparked news organizations, watchdog groups, lobbyists, political partisans, and heaven-only-knows-who-else to publish their own assessments of Trump's performance. A thorough review of the reviews probably would take the careful reader another 100 days.
So let me help. Around here, we're partial to "State of the Swamp," a 20-page report put together principally by Joe Maschman, a Common Cause legal fellow, and released this week. It's an easy and important, if sometimes depressing read, that catalogs the Trump team's ethical and in some cases, legal shortfalls.
The report also includes a slate of recommendations, crafted to keep future presidents from following Trump's bad example. They include:
- Required disclosure of at least five years of federal tax returns by major party candidates for president and vice president, in order to give the voting public information regarding such candidates' personal finances and potential conflicts of interest;
- Strengthened personal financial disclosure requirements, see 5 U.S.C. app. SSSS 101-111, to require president and vice president to disclose more detailed information regarding income and debt;
- Required disclosure of White House visitor logs and visitor logs of other venues where the president regularly conducts business (e.g., H.R.1711 / S.721, MAR-A-LAGO Act);
- Required electronic public disclosure via the White House website of ethics agreements signed by Executive Branch political appointees, and any waivers granted by the White House to the signing of such agreements;
- Strengthened "revolving door" lobbying restrictions for political appointees both entering and leaving Executive Branch employment; and
- Requiring the president and vice president to place all assets that create conflicts of interest into a blind trust managed by an independent trustee who oversees the conversion of the assets into conflict-free holdings (e.g., H.R.371 / S.65, Presidential Conflicts of Interest Act of 2017).
A passage near the end sums the report up. "TR had the Square Deal, FDR the New Deal; Trump prefers to self-deal. This president's first hundred days have seen no progress in 'draining the swamp;' instead, they have been the most corrupt in our national history."
We hope you'll check it out and then take it to heart. This is still OUR government and the Trump team are OUR employees. It's up to us to bring them back in line.
President Trump marks his 100th day in office on Saturday, a milestone he insists is meaningless even as he directs the White House staff in a frenzied effort to convince Americans he's been the most successful president ever.
The approach of Day 100 has sparked news organizations, watchdog groups, lobbyists, political partisans, and heaven-only-knows-who-else to publish their own assessments of Trump's performance. A thorough review of the reviews probably would take the careful reader another 100 days.
So let me help. Around here, we're partial to "State of the Swamp," a 20-page report put together principally by Joe Maschman, a Common Cause legal fellow, and released this week. It's an easy and important, if sometimes depressing read, that catalogs the Trump team's ethical and in some cases, legal shortfalls.
The report also includes a slate of recommendations, crafted to keep future presidents from following Trump's bad example. They include:
- Required disclosure of at least five years of federal tax returns by major party candidates for president and vice president, in order to give the voting public information regarding such candidates' personal finances and potential conflicts of interest;
- Strengthened personal financial disclosure requirements, see 5 U.S.C. app. SSSS 101-111, to require president and vice president to disclose more detailed information regarding income and debt;
- Required disclosure of White House visitor logs and visitor logs of other venues where the president regularly conducts business (e.g., H.R.1711 / S.721, MAR-A-LAGO Act);
- Required electronic public disclosure via the White House website of ethics agreements signed by Executive Branch political appointees, and any waivers granted by the White House to the signing of such agreements;
- Strengthened "revolving door" lobbying restrictions for political appointees both entering and leaving Executive Branch employment; and
- Requiring the president and vice president to place all assets that create conflicts of interest into a blind trust managed by an independent trustee who oversees the conversion of the assets into conflict-free holdings (e.g., H.R.371 / S.65, Presidential Conflicts of Interest Act of 2017).
A passage near the end sums the report up. "TR had the Square Deal, FDR the New Deal; Trump prefers to self-deal. This president's first hundred days have seen no progress in 'draining the swamp;' instead, they have been the most corrupt in our national history."
We hope you'll check it out and then take it to heart. This is still OUR government and the Trump team are OUR employees. It's up to us to bring them back in line.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.