Trump Didn't 'Revoke' Protections for Trans Students-Because He Can't
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.
If you're concerned that someone has authoritarian tendencies, the worst thing you can do is treat them like they have the power to rewrite the law. Yet that's what many media outlets did in reporting on Donald Trump's withdrawal of the Obama administration's guidance to schools on the rights of transgender students.
In various headlines (mostly gathered by the New Civil Rights Movement website--2/22/17), the Trump administration was said to "roll back" (Washington Post, 2/22/17), "rescind" (Huffington Post, 2/22/17), "withdraw" (CNN, 2/23/17; The Hill, 2/22/17), or "revoke" (Slate, 2/22/17) protection for transgender students.
The problem with this framing is that Trump does not have the power to unilaterally change what rights transgender students have. These rights derive from Title IX, a federal law passed in 1972, that bars discrimination based on gender in publicly funded schools. It was a series of federal court rulings, not the Obama administration's say-so, that found that protection against gender discrimination extends to trans people.
The Obama guidance to school administrators was about, among other things, how they should allow trans students to use restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. Its withdrawal, New Civil Rights Movement's David Badash says, is "a wink and a nod," a telegraphing that the Justice Department under Trump will not vigorously enforce Title IX, at least when it comes to transgender children.
As Lambda Legal, a leading defender of LGBTQ rights, said in a blog post (2/22/17), "Trump's actions do not change the law itself--transgender students remain protected by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972--but abandoning the guidance intentionally creates confusion about what federal law requires."
Journalists should not contribute to that confusion.In an era where the White House is bent on taking away rights from vulnerable groups, journalists need to be very clear in explaining what rights we still have.