Screenshot from 84 Lumber's Super Bowl commercial "The Entire Journey" (Courtesy of 84 Lumber)
Feb 11, 2017
The 24 hours following Super Bowl LI were full of commentary about the political angle of ads aired during the game. The recap: there was the Airbnb pro-diversity ad, the replay of the Coca Cola America the Beautiful ad in nine languages, the Audi women's rights ad, the pro-immigration Anheuser-Busch ad, and the 84 Lumber door-in-the-wall-along-Mexico's-border ad.
With the exception of Airbnb, (which is a collaborative economy business model leveraging people's homes for a service), these companies are selling us products.
In some cases they are selling us unhealthy products (Coca Cola); ones that lead to thousands of deaths annually (Anheuser-Busch); and ones that cater to those who have significant disposable income (Audi).
What do their products have to do with a more diverse and just America? Nothing, of course.
Just as sex has nothing to do with these and other products. Nonetheless, sex has frequently been what ads promise to provide.
So it's gratifying that during Super Bowl LI, corporations were selling their products and services through appeals to our better nature, advocating human rights, social justice, and peaceful coexistence.
While I know that Coca Cola, Anheuser-Busch, Audi, and 84 Lumber are not in the business of creating a better world, and their ads are carefully crafted to increase profits, I still consider these ads a very positive shift.
That appealing to our compassion and kindness is calculated to work in the selling of products is a good thing. That rejecting prejudice, "us and them" thinking, and fear-mongering are determined to boost sales is a great sign.
If justice and compassion can sell, especially in a country as polarized and angry as ours is now, that bodes well for the actual work of creating justice.
While I have no illusions that these ads will turn many viewers into engaged, conscientious activists, by normalizing and valorizing concepts such as acceptance, human rights, and diversity, they set a standard for ethical behavior and attitudes.
I do not believe that these ads would have been aired were it not for the massive citizen engagement currently underway; but whether corporations are following the mood of the citizenry or influencing that mood is not the point.
The point is that the shift is happening.
It took me the better part of a week to come to this positive conclusion. My first reaction to the enthusiasm for the ads was cynicism. Knowing that these companies do not have our or our world's best interests at heart made me feel like people were lapping up the good vibes like, well, beer, without using critical thinking and without acknowledging that it's up to each of us to actually do something to build a just, healthy, and peaceful society.
Now I feel differently. It matters that a massive audience was targeted not with promises of sex, but with promises of goodness.
Maybe this portends an outpouring of the goodness we need to harness with all our might to resist what we are facing right now in the U.S. and the world.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Zoe Weil
Zoe Weil is the co-founder and president of the Institute for Humane Education (IHE), where she created the first graduate programs in comprehensive Humane Education linking human rights, environmental preservation, and animal protection offered online through an affiliation with Antioch University. She has given six TEDx talks including her acclaimed TEDx, "The World Becomes What You Teach," and is the author of seven books including "The World Becomes What We Teach: Educating a Generation of Solutionaries" and "Most Good, Least Harm: A Simple Principle for a Better World and Meaningful Life" (2009).
The 24 hours following Super Bowl LI were full of commentary about the political angle of ads aired during the game. The recap: there was the Airbnb pro-diversity ad, the replay of the Coca Cola America the Beautiful ad in nine languages, the Audi women's rights ad, the pro-immigration Anheuser-Busch ad, and the 84 Lumber door-in-the-wall-along-Mexico's-border ad.
With the exception of Airbnb, (which is a collaborative economy business model leveraging people's homes for a service), these companies are selling us products.
In some cases they are selling us unhealthy products (Coca Cola); ones that lead to thousands of deaths annually (Anheuser-Busch); and ones that cater to those who have significant disposable income (Audi).
What do their products have to do with a more diverse and just America? Nothing, of course.
Just as sex has nothing to do with these and other products. Nonetheless, sex has frequently been what ads promise to provide.
So it's gratifying that during Super Bowl LI, corporations were selling their products and services through appeals to our better nature, advocating human rights, social justice, and peaceful coexistence.
While I know that Coca Cola, Anheuser-Busch, Audi, and 84 Lumber are not in the business of creating a better world, and their ads are carefully crafted to increase profits, I still consider these ads a very positive shift.
That appealing to our compassion and kindness is calculated to work in the selling of products is a good thing. That rejecting prejudice, "us and them" thinking, and fear-mongering are determined to boost sales is a great sign.
If justice and compassion can sell, especially in a country as polarized and angry as ours is now, that bodes well for the actual work of creating justice.
While I have no illusions that these ads will turn many viewers into engaged, conscientious activists, by normalizing and valorizing concepts such as acceptance, human rights, and diversity, they set a standard for ethical behavior and attitudes.
I do not believe that these ads would have been aired were it not for the massive citizen engagement currently underway; but whether corporations are following the mood of the citizenry or influencing that mood is not the point.
The point is that the shift is happening.
It took me the better part of a week to come to this positive conclusion. My first reaction to the enthusiasm for the ads was cynicism. Knowing that these companies do not have our or our world's best interests at heart made me feel like people were lapping up the good vibes like, well, beer, without using critical thinking and without acknowledging that it's up to each of us to actually do something to build a just, healthy, and peaceful society.
Now I feel differently. It matters that a massive audience was targeted not with promises of sex, but with promises of goodness.
Maybe this portends an outpouring of the goodness we need to harness with all our might to resist what we are facing right now in the U.S. and the world.
Zoe Weil
Zoe Weil is the co-founder and president of the Institute for Humane Education (IHE), where she created the first graduate programs in comprehensive Humane Education linking human rights, environmental preservation, and animal protection offered online through an affiliation with Antioch University. She has given six TEDx talks including her acclaimed TEDx, "The World Becomes What You Teach," and is the author of seven books including "The World Becomes What We Teach: Educating a Generation of Solutionaries" and "Most Good, Least Harm: A Simple Principle for a Better World and Meaningful Life" (2009).
The 24 hours following Super Bowl LI were full of commentary about the political angle of ads aired during the game. The recap: there was the Airbnb pro-diversity ad, the replay of the Coca Cola America the Beautiful ad in nine languages, the Audi women's rights ad, the pro-immigration Anheuser-Busch ad, and the 84 Lumber door-in-the-wall-along-Mexico's-border ad.
With the exception of Airbnb, (which is a collaborative economy business model leveraging people's homes for a service), these companies are selling us products.
In some cases they are selling us unhealthy products (Coca Cola); ones that lead to thousands of deaths annually (Anheuser-Busch); and ones that cater to those who have significant disposable income (Audi).
What do their products have to do with a more diverse and just America? Nothing, of course.
Just as sex has nothing to do with these and other products. Nonetheless, sex has frequently been what ads promise to provide.
So it's gratifying that during Super Bowl LI, corporations were selling their products and services through appeals to our better nature, advocating human rights, social justice, and peaceful coexistence.
While I know that Coca Cola, Anheuser-Busch, Audi, and 84 Lumber are not in the business of creating a better world, and their ads are carefully crafted to increase profits, I still consider these ads a very positive shift.
That appealing to our compassion and kindness is calculated to work in the selling of products is a good thing. That rejecting prejudice, "us and them" thinking, and fear-mongering are determined to boost sales is a great sign.
If justice and compassion can sell, especially in a country as polarized and angry as ours is now, that bodes well for the actual work of creating justice.
While I have no illusions that these ads will turn many viewers into engaged, conscientious activists, by normalizing and valorizing concepts such as acceptance, human rights, and diversity, they set a standard for ethical behavior and attitudes.
I do not believe that these ads would have been aired were it not for the massive citizen engagement currently underway; but whether corporations are following the mood of the citizenry or influencing that mood is not the point.
The point is that the shift is happening.
It took me the better part of a week to come to this positive conclusion. My first reaction to the enthusiasm for the ads was cynicism. Knowing that these companies do not have our or our world's best interests at heart made me feel like people were lapping up the good vibes like, well, beer, without using critical thinking and without acknowledging that it's up to each of us to actually do something to build a just, healthy, and peaceful society.
Now I feel differently. It matters that a massive audience was targeted not with promises of sex, but with promises of goodness.
Maybe this portends an outpouring of the goodness we need to harness with all our might to resist what we are facing right now in the U.S. and the world.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.