SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
This Is Why Labor Day, And the Movement That Created It, Matters
Sep 05, 2016
Economic anxiety and inequality is contributing (as it always does) to the rise of right-wing, anti-immigrant, xenophobic and racist politics. Many of the people most hurt by the decline of unions are turning to the very politicians who want to kill unions off for good.
Economic anxiety can cause people to do things that are against their self-interest. Economic anxiety can make people resent people who are doing better than they are. How often do you hear someone complain about "the people in the damn unions" getting pay, pension plans and other benefits that they don't get? Lately this has been especially focused on government employee, police and teachers unions, and the "cost" of their pensions, but it is an ongoing complaint generally. For some reason, it doesn't occur to the complainers that instead of being against unions they should join a union, too.
On this Labor Day, it's worth considering a new study that shows that these "damn unions" raise the pay for everyone, not just the union members.
Where does a lot of today's economic anxiety originate? In a study titled "Union decline lowers wages of nonunion workers," the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) looked at wage and union data from 1979 to 2013, and compared different regions and industrial sectors. This was a period of rapid decline of union membership, and the study looked at the costs of this decline. The data clearly showed that where unions were stronger, working people in the entire region and sector were paid more, even if they were not in a union. This is because the union jobs set the standard for the region and industry. As union jobs go away, those standards fall away.
How much more would non-union working people be paid today if unions were still strong? The study shows how the decline of unions means those working people not in unions are paid around $3,000 per year less than they would have been paid. The cost for "non-college" workers has been a 9 percent cut in pay. That is what the decline of unions has cost the American worker.
We talk about inequality a lot, and this study shows part of the reason why: Nonunion workers would be making around $3,000 more if unions were still strong. The EPI put it this way, "Unions, especially in industries and regions where they are strong, help boost the wages of all workers by establishing pay and benefit standards that many nonunion firms adopt."
Here are two charts from the EPI study. The first shows that the decline of unions has hit men hardest:
This chart shows the boost non-college workers would receive if unions were still as strong as in 1979:
To what degree does the decline of unions since the late 1970s contribute to today's support for Donald Trump and his policies among "white, working-class" voters? At least $3,000 a year worth, whether they are in a union or not.
THIS is why the labor movement that Labor Day was intended to honor matters to all of us, whether we are union members or not.
See also Richard Eskow last week: "How Much Will the War On Unions Cost You This Labor Day?"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Dave Johnson
Dave Johnson is a former Senior Fellow for the Campaign for America's Future & Renew California.
Economic anxiety and inequality is contributing (as it always does) to the rise of right-wing, anti-immigrant, xenophobic and racist politics. Many of the people most hurt by the decline of unions are turning to the very politicians who want to kill unions off for good.
Economic anxiety can cause people to do things that are against their self-interest. Economic anxiety can make people resent people who are doing better than they are. How often do you hear someone complain about "the people in the damn unions" getting pay, pension plans and other benefits that they don't get? Lately this has been especially focused on government employee, police and teachers unions, and the "cost" of their pensions, but it is an ongoing complaint generally. For some reason, it doesn't occur to the complainers that instead of being against unions they should join a union, too.
On this Labor Day, it's worth considering a new study that shows that these "damn unions" raise the pay for everyone, not just the union members.
Where does a lot of today's economic anxiety originate? In a study titled "Union decline lowers wages of nonunion workers," the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) looked at wage and union data from 1979 to 2013, and compared different regions and industrial sectors. This was a period of rapid decline of union membership, and the study looked at the costs of this decline. The data clearly showed that where unions were stronger, working people in the entire region and sector were paid more, even if they were not in a union. This is because the union jobs set the standard for the region and industry. As union jobs go away, those standards fall away.
How much more would non-union working people be paid today if unions were still strong? The study shows how the decline of unions means those working people not in unions are paid around $3,000 per year less than they would have been paid. The cost for "non-college" workers has been a 9 percent cut in pay. That is what the decline of unions has cost the American worker.
We talk about inequality a lot, and this study shows part of the reason why: Nonunion workers would be making around $3,000 more if unions were still strong. The EPI put it this way, "Unions, especially in industries and regions where they are strong, help boost the wages of all workers by establishing pay and benefit standards that many nonunion firms adopt."
Here are two charts from the EPI study. The first shows that the decline of unions has hit men hardest:
This chart shows the boost non-college workers would receive if unions were still as strong as in 1979:
To what degree does the decline of unions since the late 1970s contribute to today's support for Donald Trump and his policies among "white, working-class" voters? At least $3,000 a year worth, whether they are in a union or not.
THIS is why the labor movement that Labor Day was intended to honor matters to all of us, whether we are union members or not.
See also Richard Eskow last week: "How Much Will the War On Unions Cost You This Labor Day?"
Dave Johnson
Dave Johnson is a former Senior Fellow for the Campaign for America's Future & Renew California.
Economic anxiety and inequality is contributing (as it always does) to the rise of right-wing, anti-immigrant, xenophobic and racist politics. Many of the people most hurt by the decline of unions are turning to the very politicians who want to kill unions off for good.
Economic anxiety can cause people to do things that are against their self-interest. Economic anxiety can make people resent people who are doing better than they are. How often do you hear someone complain about "the people in the damn unions" getting pay, pension plans and other benefits that they don't get? Lately this has been especially focused on government employee, police and teachers unions, and the "cost" of their pensions, but it is an ongoing complaint generally. For some reason, it doesn't occur to the complainers that instead of being against unions they should join a union, too.
On this Labor Day, it's worth considering a new study that shows that these "damn unions" raise the pay for everyone, not just the union members.
Where does a lot of today's economic anxiety originate? In a study titled "Union decline lowers wages of nonunion workers," the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) looked at wage and union data from 1979 to 2013, and compared different regions and industrial sectors. This was a period of rapid decline of union membership, and the study looked at the costs of this decline. The data clearly showed that where unions were stronger, working people in the entire region and sector were paid more, even if they were not in a union. This is because the union jobs set the standard for the region and industry. As union jobs go away, those standards fall away.
How much more would non-union working people be paid today if unions were still strong? The study shows how the decline of unions means those working people not in unions are paid around $3,000 per year less than they would have been paid. The cost for "non-college" workers has been a 9 percent cut in pay. That is what the decline of unions has cost the American worker.
We talk about inequality a lot, and this study shows part of the reason why: Nonunion workers would be making around $3,000 more if unions were still strong. The EPI put it this way, "Unions, especially in industries and regions where they are strong, help boost the wages of all workers by establishing pay and benefit standards that many nonunion firms adopt."
Here are two charts from the EPI study. The first shows that the decline of unions has hit men hardest:
This chart shows the boost non-college workers would receive if unions were still as strong as in 1979:
To what degree does the decline of unions since the late 1970s contribute to today's support for Donald Trump and his policies among "white, working-class" voters? At least $3,000 a year worth, whether they are in a union or not.
THIS is why the labor movement that Labor Day was intended to honor matters to all of us, whether we are union members or not.
See also Richard Eskow last week: "How Much Will the War On Unions Cost You This Labor Day?"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.