SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
One has to wonder why Beltway reporters, self-proclaimed political junkies, have such a profound lack of interest in a story about people willing to be arrested on the steps of the nation's Capitol in order to protest the role of money in politics.
(Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Protests Against Money in Politics Hold Little Interest for Beltway's 'Political Junkies'
More than 400 people were arrested in a non-violent sit-in on Capitol Hill April 11, many having marched 150 miles from the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. The protest, called Democracy Spring, is about ending the influence of big money in politics and ensuring free, fair elections through things like restoring the Voting Rights Act. The next day, another 85 mostly elderly people were arrested, many chanting, "Democracy is not for sale, [we're] not too old to go to jail."
Apr 15, 2016
More than 400 people were arrested in a non-violent sit-in on Capitol Hill April 11, many having marched 150 miles from the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. The protest, called Democracy Spring, is about ending the influence of big money in politics and ensuring free, fair elections through things like restoring the Voting Rights Act. The next day, another 85 mostly elderly people were arrested, many chanting, "Democracy is not for sale, [we're] not too old to go to jail."
Seems like a story. And wait, yes, there it was in the Washington Post--in the Metro section, page B3...in the brief items...after the one about the 10-year-old boy hit by a car riding his bike, after the one about the man who got two years for tax evasion....
Yes, there: 150 or so words on the arrests, with the Post saying the organizing group seeks to prevent "what it called 'voter suppression.'"
As of April 14, the New York Times had yet to report in print on the demonstrations and mass arrests in the nation's capital. Research by The Intercept (4/12/16) noted that cable news, with all that time to fill, also took a pass. As of April 12, CNN had done nothing, MSNBC mentioned the protests for approximately 12 seconds, while Fox News gave them about 17 seconds. Later CNN (4/12/16) put a short item on its website.
On Democracy Now! (4/12/16), organizer Kai Newkirk said the protests posed a challenge for anyone running for office: "Are you going to stand on the side of democracy and on the side of the people, or on the side of big money and corruption?"
One has to wonder why Beltway reporters, self-proclaimed political junkies, have such a profound lack of interest in following that line of inquiry.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
big money influencecampaign financedemocracy spring protestmsnbcpeople powervoting rights actmoney in politics
More than 400 people were arrested in a non-violent sit-in on Capitol Hill April 11, many having marched 150 miles from the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. The protest, called Democracy Spring, is about ending the influence of big money in politics and ensuring free, fair elections through things like restoring the Voting Rights Act. The next day, another 85 mostly elderly people were arrested, many chanting, "Democracy is not for sale, [we're] not too old to go to jail."
Seems like a story. And wait, yes, there it was in the Washington Post--in the Metro section, page B3...in the brief items...after the one about the 10-year-old boy hit by a car riding his bike, after the one about the man who got two years for tax evasion....
Yes, there: 150 or so words on the arrests, with the Post saying the organizing group seeks to prevent "what it called 'voter suppression.'"
As of April 14, the New York Times had yet to report in print on the demonstrations and mass arrests in the nation's capital. Research by The Intercept (4/12/16) noted that cable news, with all that time to fill, also took a pass. As of April 12, CNN had done nothing, MSNBC mentioned the protests for approximately 12 seconds, while Fox News gave them about 17 seconds. Later CNN (4/12/16) put a short item on its website.
On Democracy Now! (4/12/16), organizer Kai Newkirk said the protests posed a challenge for anyone running for office: "Are you going to stand on the side of democracy and on the side of the people, or on the side of big money and corruption?"
One has to wonder why Beltway reporters, self-proclaimed political junkies, have such a profound lack of interest in following that line of inquiry.
Janine Jackson
Janine Jackson is Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) program director and producer/co-host of FAIR's syndicated radio show CounterSpin. She contributes frequently to FAIR's magazine, Extra! and co-edited "The FAIR Reader: An Extra! Review of Press and Politics in the '90s" (2019).
More than 400 people were arrested in a non-violent sit-in on Capitol Hill April 11, many having marched 150 miles from the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia. The protest, called Democracy Spring, is about ending the influence of big money in politics and ensuring free, fair elections through things like restoring the Voting Rights Act. The next day, another 85 mostly elderly people were arrested, many chanting, "Democracy is not for sale, [we're] not too old to go to jail."
Seems like a story. And wait, yes, there it was in the Washington Post--in the Metro section, page B3...in the brief items...after the one about the 10-year-old boy hit by a car riding his bike, after the one about the man who got two years for tax evasion....
Yes, there: 150 or so words on the arrests, with the Post saying the organizing group seeks to prevent "what it called 'voter suppression.'"
As of April 14, the New York Times had yet to report in print on the demonstrations and mass arrests in the nation's capital. Research by The Intercept (4/12/16) noted that cable news, with all that time to fill, also took a pass. As of April 12, CNN had done nothing, MSNBC mentioned the protests for approximately 12 seconds, while Fox News gave them about 17 seconds. Later CNN (4/12/16) put a short item on its website.
On Democracy Now! (4/12/16), organizer Kai Newkirk said the protests posed a challenge for anyone running for office: "Are you going to stand on the side of democracy and on the side of the people, or on the side of big money and corruption?"
One has to wonder why Beltway reporters, self-proclaimed political junkies, have such a profound lack of interest in following that line of inquiry.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.