US Would Be Wrong to Ban Muslim Refugees
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.