SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
'In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want.' (Photo: AP)
US Would Be Wrong to Ban Muslim Refugees
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Nov 19, 2015
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
© 2023 Brennan Center for Justice
Faiza Patel
Faiza Patel serves as Co-Director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. She is also a member of the UN Human Rights Council's Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries. Follow her on Twitter: @FaizaPatelBCJ
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.
Faiza Patel
Faiza Patel serves as Co-Director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. She is also a member of the UN Human Rights Council's Working Group on the Use of Mercenaries. Follow her on Twitter: @FaizaPatelBCJ
The brutal and violent nature of the terrorist group Daesh (ISIS) was brought into sharp relief by last week's attacks in Paris, as well as those carried out in Beirut and Baghdad. We want to stop these terrorists in their tracks, and certainly well before they reach our shores. And that means thinking carefully about what they are trying to accomplish so that we fight them on our own terms, rather than theirs.
Terrorist groups seek to create a wedge between Muslims and those of other faiths. Daesh has called for the destruction of what it calls the "gray zone," where people of all religions co-exist. The places where we come together to share a laugh or to enjoy good food or music are in their crosshairs. Daesh (and Al Qaeda before it) want to provoke a backlash against Muslims because it nourishes their message and their cause.
By accepting refugees from Syria, the United States and Europe are doing the right thing from a humanitarian perspective and from a security perspective. They are showing, through their actions, that Muslims are welcome in the West. But limiting Syrian refugees to those of the Christian faith sends the opposite message. That's exactly what the terrorists want.
Of course, we should -- and do -- carefully vet Syrian refugees for security risks, as we do with others who come to our shores. But discriminating against refugees because of their faith is deeply offensive to our constitutional values. Freedom of religion is the bedrock principle on which our democracy was built. We shouldn't abandon it because of a bunch of thugs.
We also should resist making our enemies out to be greater than they are. By conflating Daesh with Islam, even with the "radical" prefix, we give them the mantle of representing Islam. It belongs to the 1.6 billion Muslims around the world who have nothing to do with terrorism. We unnecessarily strain our alliances and we put American Muslims at risk of hate crimes.
In standing by our values and our fellow human beings, we deny terrorists what they want. That's a win in my book.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.