To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Fed chair Nany Yellen. Off the table for now is the immediate fear that a rate hike would set in motion a slowing down of economic growth before that growth could lift the fortunes of millions of people still looking for work or whose wages have stagnated because the labor market is not tight enough. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Hours before the Federal Reserve was to announce whether it would increase interest rates, several dozen protesters gathered outside Federal Reserve offices in downtown Washington to demand that the Fed keep interest rates where they are, arguing that the economy as they experience it has yet to recover.
It was not clear whether any of the Federal Reserve members heard the demonstrators, organized by the Center for Popular Democracy's Fed Up coalition, but the demonstrators got their victory nonetheless: After the protesters left, the Fed announced that it would keep its zero-interest-rate policy in effect for a while longer.
That takes off the table the immediate fear that a rate hike would set in motion a slowing down of economic growth before that growth could lift the fortunes of millions of people still looking for work or whose wages have stagnated because the labor market is not tight enough.
"The case for raising short-term interest rates is extraordinarily weak," said Josh Bivens, economist with the Economic Policy Institute. That case would be a tight labor market that forces employers to pay more to find good workers, and an inflation rate that is accelerating. "That is not the economy we have today."
The Fed agreed, saying in a statement that it would wait for "some further improvement in the labor market" and noting that " inflation is anticipated to remain near its recent low level in the near term."
There still remains the longer-term issue of reclaiming the definition of "full employment" in a way that makes sense for workers and the Main Street economy.
Many economic experts and commentators have been declaring that at an unemployment rate of 5.1 percent overall the U.S. economy has already just about reached full employment - hence the pressure on the Fed to increase interest rates and focus on taming inflation, even though inflation rates are far from being in a position to need to be tamed.
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced a bill in Congress today that says what most people on Main Street know is the reality - we are nowhere near full employment yet.
That bill would explicitly define unemployment at "rate of not more than 4 percent" and would call on the Federal Reserve to work toward that goal and "a stable rate of inflation."
"Now the swappers and the investors and the funders on Wall Street gave us the recession and threw millions of Americans out of work and caused a lot of pain and suffering. What we're doing now is taking action," Conyers said. "We want jobs, and the only we can get it is to follow the plans of progressive economists" to encourage more investment in the Main Street economy and create more jobs.
That bill is unlikely to get a serious hearing in a Republican-controlled Congress, but it is a way to change an economic discussion that is often too preoccupied with the ghost of inflation and not concerned enough about the reality of people who are out of work or stranded in low-paying jobs.
"Let's test how low unemployment can go," Bivens said. "That's what they stakes are about today."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Hours before the Federal Reserve was to announce whether it would increase interest rates, several dozen protesters gathered outside Federal Reserve offices in downtown Washington to demand that the Fed keep interest rates where they are, arguing that the economy as they experience it has yet to recover.
It was not clear whether any of the Federal Reserve members heard the demonstrators, organized by the Center for Popular Democracy's Fed Up coalition, but the demonstrators got their victory nonetheless: After the protesters left, the Fed announced that it would keep its zero-interest-rate policy in effect for a while longer.
That takes off the table the immediate fear that a rate hike would set in motion a slowing down of economic growth before that growth could lift the fortunes of millions of people still looking for work or whose wages have stagnated because the labor market is not tight enough.
"The case for raising short-term interest rates is extraordinarily weak," said Josh Bivens, economist with the Economic Policy Institute. That case would be a tight labor market that forces employers to pay more to find good workers, and an inflation rate that is accelerating. "That is not the economy we have today."
The Fed agreed, saying in a statement that it would wait for "some further improvement in the labor market" and noting that " inflation is anticipated to remain near its recent low level in the near term."
There still remains the longer-term issue of reclaiming the definition of "full employment" in a way that makes sense for workers and the Main Street economy.
Many economic experts and commentators have been declaring that at an unemployment rate of 5.1 percent overall the U.S. economy has already just about reached full employment - hence the pressure on the Fed to increase interest rates and focus on taming inflation, even though inflation rates are far from being in a position to need to be tamed.
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced a bill in Congress today that says what most people on Main Street know is the reality - we are nowhere near full employment yet.
That bill would explicitly define unemployment at "rate of not more than 4 percent" and would call on the Federal Reserve to work toward that goal and "a stable rate of inflation."
"Now the swappers and the investors and the funders on Wall Street gave us the recession and threw millions of Americans out of work and caused a lot of pain and suffering. What we're doing now is taking action," Conyers said. "We want jobs, and the only we can get it is to follow the plans of progressive economists" to encourage more investment in the Main Street economy and create more jobs.
That bill is unlikely to get a serious hearing in a Republican-controlled Congress, but it is a way to change an economic discussion that is often too preoccupied with the ghost of inflation and not concerned enough about the reality of people who are out of work or stranded in low-paying jobs.
"Let's test how low unemployment can go," Bivens said. "That's what they stakes are about today."
Hours before the Federal Reserve was to announce whether it would increase interest rates, several dozen protesters gathered outside Federal Reserve offices in downtown Washington to demand that the Fed keep interest rates where they are, arguing that the economy as they experience it has yet to recover.
It was not clear whether any of the Federal Reserve members heard the demonstrators, organized by the Center for Popular Democracy's Fed Up coalition, but the demonstrators got their victory nonetheless: After the protesters left, the Fed announced that it would keep its zero-interest-rate policy in effect for a while longer.
That takes off the table the immediate fear that a rate hike would set in motion a slowing down of economic growth before that growth could lift the fortunes of millions of people still looking for work or whose wages have stagnated because the labor market is not tight enough.
"The case for raising short-term interest rates is extraordinarily weak," said Josh Bivens, economist with the Economic Policy Institute. That case would be a tight labor market that forces employers to pay more to find good workers, and an inflation rate that is accelerating. "That is not the economy we have today."
The Fed agreed, saying in a statement that it would wait for "some further improvement in the labor market" and noting that " inflation is anticipated to remain near its recent low level in the near term."
There still remains the longer-term issue of reclaiming the definition of "full employment" in a way that makes sense for workers and the Main Street economy.
Many economic experts and commentators have been declaring that at an unemployment rate of 5.1 percent overall the U.S. economy has already just about reached full employment - hence the pressure on the Fed to increase interest rates and focus on taming inflation, even though inflation rates are far from being in a position to need to be tamed.
Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced a bill in Congress today that says what most people on Main Street know is the reality - we are nowhere near full employment yet.
That bill would explicitly define unemployment at "rate of not more than 4 percent" and would call on the Federal Reserve to work toward that goal and "a stable rate of inflation."
"Now the swappers and the investors and the funders on Wall Street gave us the recession and threw millions of Americans out of work and caused a lot of pain and suffering. What we're doing now is taking action," Conyers said. "We want jobs, and the only we can get it is to follow the plans of progressive economists" to encourage more investment in the Main Street economy and create more jobs.
That bill is unlikely to get a serious hearing in a Republican-controlled Congress, but it is a way to change an economic discussion that is often too preoccupied with the ghost of inflation and not concerned enough about the reality of people who are out of work or stranded in low-paying jobs.
"Let's test how low unemployment can go," Bivens said. "That's what they stakes are about today."