Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

While anti-choice activists failed in their latest attempt to defund Planned Parenthood in the Senate, the pro-choice movement is still making crucial tactical errors. (Photo: Olivier Douliery/Getty)

Why We're Losing the Planned Parenthood Debate, and How We Can Win

Erin MatsonPamela Merritt

 by Rolling Stone

On Monday, a procedural vote on a bill to defund Planned Parenthood's non-abortion services failed to gather the votes required to move forward. The Republican-sponsored bill was a special blend of magical thinking and outright misogyny. Few observers expected it to pass – but its inevitable demise was exaggerated as a meaningful victory. Pro-choice leaders have been making this mistake for years, and it's why our movement is losing.

The debate at hand is a specific push to defund Planned Parenthood's non-abortion-related services, but it is at least as much one more move in a long game to make abortion illegal by demonizing abortions and dehumanizing the people who have them. S. 1881 surfaced only after an extremist group with ties to abortion clinic terrorism began to release edited and misleading sting videos that aim to paint abortion as disgusting and immoral, and edit women out of the discussion entirely. It is no mistake the bill changes the standard colloquialism for routine OB-GYN exams – well-woman visits – to "well-child care." Meanwhile, the left has utterly failed to respond in an effective way to this latest attack on the dignity and humanity of women.

Abortion is basic health care. One in three women have abortions, and they are doing nothing wrong. Women are fully capable of making their own moral decisions, and suggestions to the contrary are just plain sexism. There is no hope for gender equality – social, political, legal, economic – until every person is free to have sex and have children on their own terms. This can't be achieved through access to contraception or abstinence alone. Abortion must be accessible and affordable for women to have a fair shot, plain and simple. It is equally important to embrace a full reproductive justice agenda that affirms the right to abortion, the right to be pregnant and have quality health care to support positive birth outcomes, and the right to raise families in safe and healthy communities.'

Is this what the left is saying in response? No. Instead, the leadership of the House Pro-Choice Caucus, including Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colorado), issued a cautious statement after the Planned Parenthood sting videos. Others, like Sen. Al Franken (D-Minnesota), critiqued the lack of "sensitivity" of the abortion providers who were manipulated on tape. Hillary Clinton implicitly shamed the one in three women who have abortions with the claim that abortion should be "legal, safe, and rare." Sen. Angus King (I-Maine) wrote abortion out of health care and women's lives by saying that 97 percent of Planned Parenthood health centers' services "have nothing to do with abortion, they have to do with women's health." Why are these legislators arguing defensively, instead of making a strong case for the right to reproductive health care?

Advocates wasted time shoring up votes that never should have been in question. For example, calls to encourage Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Missouri) to do her pro-choice duty appeared quite successful at first glance – McCaskill voted against the bill. But in a post-vote interview heavily seasoned with rhetoric about how "we all want to prevent abortions," McCaskill appeared to support calls for an investigation into Planned Parenthood to "make sure they haven't broken the law." The only thing more disturbing than McCaskill's lack of spine is pro-choice organizations asking her constituents to thank her for it.

Not only are these tactics shaming and insulting, they take up valuable air space that could have been used to denounce the opposition – which is full of people like Sen. Dan Coats (R-Indiana), who used this bill as an opportunity to make an offensive comparison of abortion to slavery.

Our movement is losing because we act like losers who are truly, deeply sorry. We apologize for abortion. We accept the opposition's premise that the only way to fund other forms of health care is to defund abortion. We celebrate every time President Obama offers a new "compromise" on birth control; contrast this to leading LGBT movement funder Tim Sweeney, who has put out a goal to shut down the religious liberty debate in three years. We reinforce the lie that abortion, birth control and sexuality are matters of naughty behavior that can be corrected, and we fail to stand up for the dignity of women and all people. That's not proactive. That's a blushing and stammering apology.

The pro-choice movement has a chronic case of electionitis – it's perpetually caught up in the election-cycle needs of the Democratic Party, whose leaders say all the right things about supporting abortion in the official platform and then proceed to run anti-choice candidates, tell us what to do, and shrug their shoulders and ban abortion funding nearly every chance they get. The LGBT movement has made tremendous strides not just because attitudes toward equality have changed, but because the posture of activists has changed: The grassroots has shifted from applause to accountability, and from elections to direct action. It is time for reproductive health, rights and justice activists to do the same. In this spirit, we are pleased to announce that later this month we will launch Reproaction, a new direct action group forming to increase access to abortion and advance reproductive justice. We'll see you in the streets.

© 2021 Rolling Stone

Erin Matson

Erin Matson is an organizer and writer committed to expanding abortion rights and the co-founder of Reproaction. Erin lives in Virginia and has a young daughter. Follow her on Twitter: @erintothemax

Pamela Merritt

Pamela Merritt, co-founder of Reproaction, is an activist and writer committed to empowering individuals and communities through reproductive justice. A proud Midwesterner, Merritt is dedicated to protecting and expanding access to the full spectrum of reproductive healthcare. Follower her on Twitter: @SharkFu

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Eliminating Nuclear Weapons 'Is Not Only Possible, It Is Necessary': UN Chief

"At a moment of rising geopolitical division, mistrust, and outright aggression, we are in danger of forgetting the terrible lessons of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, and the Cold War, and inciting a humanitarian Armageddon," warns António Guterres.

Jessica Corbett ·

'Huge Victory': Starbucks Agrees to Begin Contract Talks With 230+ Union Stores

"We've been ready to bargain since day one," said one union leader, "but now we're operating together on a national level to make sure all of our voices are heard, together."

Jake Johnson ·

Sinema Calls for Restoring 60-Vote Filibuster for Senate Confirmations

"What she's saying," wrote one critic, "is this: 'Let's make what's already the most undemocratic body in government positively anti-democratic by enshrining minority rule.'"

Kenny Stancil ·

On Eve of Senate Vote, Activists Make Last 'Big Push' Against Manchin 'Dirty Deal'

"Our elected congressional representatives cannot bless a backroom deal brokered by fossil fuel industry lobbyists that promises untold damage to American communities like mine," said one frontline activist.

Brett Wilkins ·

'We Aren't Going to War': Draft Officer Shot Amid Russian Anger Over Conscription

A 25-year-old reportedly opened fire at a military recruitment office in Irkutsk after his best friend received draft papers.

Julia Conley ·

Common Dreams Logo