Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

'Disability insurance payments are in effect being held hostage for so-called conservative “reforms” that would make it harder for some people on disability to receive benefits and possibly cut benefits for future Social Security retirees.' (Image: CNN)

On Day 1, House GOP Rigs The Rules For The Rich, Against The Disabled

The House of Representatives wasted no time Tuesday in setting up schemes that are designed to comfort the comfortable and afflict the afflicted.

House Republicans approved on late Tuesday a resolution of operating rules that include several pretty outrageous provisions, such as an authorization to keep beating the dead horse of Benghazi, the effort to smear the Obama administration’s response to the 2012 Libya Embassy attack. But one of the most outrageous will allow Republicans to get away with claiming that tax cuts on the wealthy in effect defy gravity by increasing revenues and lowering deficits, thus making them easier to slip through Congress.

At the same time, a sentence in the rules resolution puts in jeopardy Social Security disability benefits for millions of people by deliberately making it harder for the government to cover their cost.

This from the Republican Party that just a couple of days ago Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said wanted to present itself as less “scary.” If you’re a corporation or a billionaire, you have nothing to fear. But if you happen to be too disabled to work, be afraid, be very afraid.

To smooth its tax-cutting, government-gutting agenda, the House has mandated that its budget and tax referees, the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation, use something called “dynamic scoring” to measure the impact of tax cuts on the budget.

What Republicans want to do is to corrupt what has been for the most part nonideological budget analysis – sometimes the CBO and JCT come to conclusions that progressive lawmakers like, sometimes they don’t – with the presumption that tax cuts lead to economic growth, especially if those tax cuts are at the top end.

Congressional conservatives don’t want the public to hear that tax cuts reduce government revenue (and thus increase deficits) and don’t inexorably translate to economic growth that is broadly shared. Through the magic of “dynamic scoring” – what George H. W. Bush in a moment of clarity called “voodoo economics” – cutting taxes increases economic activity and thus even more government revenue.

The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities has a thorough explanation of what’s wrong with dynamic scoring. The bottom line is it allows Republicans to present speculation, or even outright fiction, as budgetary fact, so that it can justify tax giveaways that otherwise would not pass muster.

Imagine on a national scale the disaster that is currently unfolding in Kansas, where archconservative Gov. Sam Brownback muscled through a series of top-end tax cuts that have backfired and are now leading to deep budget deficits. Brownback explicitly said that these tax cuts would pay for themselves. What we’re seeing in Kansas is the latest example of the failure of the conservative tax dogma that gave us the “Laffer Curve” of the 1970s, the trickle-down economics of the 1980s and the deficit-raising Bush tax cuts of the 2000s. And now House Republicans have empowered themselves to further impose the fiction on tax policy. It means we’ll have to push harder to make sure that the truth about Republican tax policy gets heard as conservatives and the media pass on the newly tainted assessments of the CBO and JCT as authoritative and factual.

Meanwhile, we highlighted last month the opportunity for Congress to make a modest temporary fix to ensure that the Social Security disability trust fund can pay full benefits to its recipients through 2016 and beyond. It would involve Congress allowing funds to move between the Social Security old-age retirement fund and the disability fund, which Congress has allowed 11 times since the late 1960s.

Without such a transfer, people on disability insurance would start seeing sharp cuts in their benefit checks starting sometime next year. Nonetheless, in an apparent response to opposition of groups such as the Heritage Foundation, House Republicans added a sentence to their operating rules that would make it harder for them to authorize such a transfer between the funds.

Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) in a statement put his finger directly on what’s behind this move: “Republicans want to set the stage to cut benefits for seniors and disabled Americans.”

Disability insurance payments are in effect being held hostage for so-called conservative “reforms” that would make it harder for some people on disability to receive benefits and possibly cut benefits for future Social Security retirees.

With this as their opening gambit, it’s clear that conservatives in Congress have no intention of easing their assault on the pillars of economic security for working people – and their efforts to secure even more for the top 1 percent.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
Isaiah J. Poole

Isaiah J. Poole

Isaiah J. Poole is the editorial director of The Next System Project, a project of the Democracy Collaborative. He was previously communications director for People’s Action and for the Campaign for America’s Future, where his responsibilities included serving as editor for the organization’s website and blog, Poole has more than 30 years of experience in journalism, both as a reporter covering Washington D.C.-area and national politics and as a news and features editor. He also was a founding member of both the Washington Association of Black Journalists and the National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo