Chuck Todd, Militarism and Media Diversity
To his credit, NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd is doing interviews with some press critics; he spoke to NYU professor Jay Rosen (10/9/14) recently, and also to liberal watchdog group Media Matters (10/22/14). And some of his comments to the latter are revealing; Todd really wants to mix things up on the Sunday chat show, but not too much.
Todd was interviewed by Media Matters' Joe Strupp , and they discussed the lack of diversity on Todd's show. Last year, Strupp noted, 62 percent of the guests on the show were white men. Todd countered by trying to argue that perhaps "geographical diversity" should be a consideration-guests who weren't from New York and Washington, DC. Strupp pointed out that even by that standard, Meet the Press has been heavy on familiar faces like James Baker, Henry Kissinger and Michael Bloomberg.
Todd insisted he was trying, but then pointed out that some things are beyond his control:
Look, there's some things you can control. I can't control, sometimes, the fact that 90 percent of the generals and the military experts out there-you know what I mean? Some of this stuff is out of your control. At the end of the day, you want to put the best people on. You want to put the best, smartest people on.
I think I know what he means. He wants to have diverse discussions, of course, but when the country might be embarking on a new war (or just extending an old one), then you just have to bring on the TV generals. And those, it turns out, are mostly white guys. And how could a TV show talk about war without talking to ex-military officials?
The fact that it seems inconceivable to cover war any other way really says a lot. Of course, it's not hard to imagine a different kind of war coverage, one that speaks to regional experts, lawyers or even-gasp!-peace advocates. But that's not even a remote possibility, even though doing so would surely make for a more diverse show in every way. No, the goal is to get the "smartest people"-which is why you're bound to see Joe Scarborough on Meet the Press. Because, clearly, he's one of the smartest.
Todd's response isn't the first time a media figure has responded to criticism this way. Back in 2010, after FAIR released a study of the elite bias of the PBS NewsHour guestlist, the show's executive producer Linda Winslow (FAIR Media Advisory, 10/25/10) said this:
FAIR seems to be accusing us of covering the people who make decisions that affect people's lives, many of whom work in government, the military or corporate America. That's what we do: We're a news program, and that's who makes news.
If you define "news" as talking to powerful people, then it's absolutely predictable that your show will talk to a whole lot of white men. But here's a radical concept: How about talking to people who don't already have enormous political power or media platforms? It's a radical concept, but imagine what kind of media system that would look like.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
To his credit, NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd is doing interviews with some press critics; he spoke to NYU professor Jay Rosen (10/9/14) recently, and also to liberal watchdog group Media Matters (10/22/14). And some of his comments to the latter are revealing; Todd really wants to mix things up on the Sunday chat show, but not too much.
Todd was interviewed by Media Matters' Joe Strupp , and they discussed the lack of diversity on Todd's show. Last year, Strupp noted, 62 percent of the guests on the show were white men. Todd countered by trying to argue that perhaps "geographical diversity" should be a consideration-guests who weren't from New York and Washington, DC. Strupp pointed out that even by that standard, Meet the Press has been heavy on familiar faces like James Baker, Henry Kissinger and Michael Bloomberg.
Todd insisted he was trying, but then pointed out that some things are beyond his control:
Look, there's some things you can control. I can't control, sometimes, the fact that 90 percent of the generals and the military experts out there-you know what I mean? Some of this stuff is out of your control. At the end of the day, you want to put the best people on. You want to put the best, smartest people on.
I think I know what he means. He wants to have diverse discussions, of course, but when the country might be embarking on a new war (or just extending an old one), then you just have to bring on the TV generals. And those, it turns out, are mostly white guys. And how could a TV show talk about war without talking to ex-military officials?
The fact that it seems inconceivable to cover war any other way really says a lot. Of course, it's not hard to imagine a different kind of war coverage, one that speaks to regional experts, lawyers or even-gasp!-peace advocates. But that's not even a remote possibility, even though doing so would surely make for a more diverse show in every way. No, the goal is to get the "smartest people"-which is why you're bound to see Joe Scarborough on Meet the Press. Because, clearly, he's one of the smartest.
Todd's response isn't the first time a media figure has responded to criticism this way. Back in 2010, after FAIR released a study of the elite bias of the PBS NewsHour guestlist, the show's executive producer Linda Winslow (FAIR Media Advisory, 10/25/10) said this:
FAIR seems to be accusing us of covering the people who make decisions that affect people's lives, many of whom work in government, the military or corporate America. That's what we do: We're a news program, and that's who makes news.
If you define "news" as talking to powerful people, then it's absolutely predictable that your show will talk to a whole lot of white men. But here's a radical concept: How about talking to people who don't already have enormous political power or media platforms? It's a radical concept, but imagine what kind of media system that would look like.
To his credit, NBC Meet the Press host Chuck Todd is doing interviews with some press critics; he spoke to NYU professor Jay Rosen (10/9/14) recently, and also to liberal watchdog group Media Matters (10/22/14). And some of his comments to the latter are revealing; Todd really wants to mix things up on the Sunday chat show, but not too much.
Todd was interviewed by Media Matters' Joe Strupp , and they discussed the lack of diversity on Todd's show. Last year, Strupp noted, 62 percent of the guests on the show were white men. Todd countered by trying to argue that perhaps "geographical diversity" should be a consideration-guests who weren't from New York and Washington, DC. Strupp pointed out that even by that standard, Meet the Press has been heavy on familiar faces like James Baker, Henry Kissinger and Michael Bloomberg.
Todd insisted he was trying, but then pointed out that some things are beyond his control:
Look, there's some things you can control. I can't control, sometimes, the fact that 90 percent of the generals and the military experts out there-you know what I mean? Some of this stuff is out of your control. At the end of the day, you want to put the best people on. You want to put the best, smartest people on.
I think I know what he means. He wants to have diverse discussions, of course, but when the country might be embarking on a new war (or just extending an old one), then you just have to bring on the TV generals. And those, it turns out, are mostly white guys. And how could a TV show talk about war without talking to ex-military officials?
The fact that it seems inconceivable to cover war any other way really says a lot. Of course, it's not hard to imagine a different kind of war coverage, one that speaks to regional experts, lawyers or even-gasp!-peace advocates. But that's not even a remote possibility, even though doing so would surely make for a more diverse show in every way. No, the goal is to get the "smartest people"-which is why you're bound to see Joe Scarborough on Meet the Press. Because, clearly, he's one of the smartest.
Todd's response isn't the first time a media figure has responded to criticism this way. Back in 2010, after FAIR released a study of the elite bias of the PBS NewsHour guestlist, the show's executive producer Linda Winslow (FAIR Media Advisory, 10/25/10) said this:
FAIR seems to be accusing us of covering the people who make decisions that affect people's lives, many of whom work in government, the military or corporate America. That's what we do: We're a news program, and that's who makes news.
If you define "news" as talking to powerful people, then it's absolutely predictable that your show will talk to a whole lot of white men. But here's a radical concept: How about talking to people who don't already have enormous political power or media platforms? It's a radical concept, but imagine what kind of media system that would look like.