SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation. (Image: rockefellerfoundation.org)
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.