Regional Resilience is Community Resilience
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.
An underlying insight in the community resilience movement is that individuals can have the greatest impact locally; i.e., closest to home. But what is local, and what is home?
Here in New England, many of us are coming to see that none of our towns are resilient until all of them are. We recognize that we are nested within larger systems of culture, climate, and exchange, and that many life-sustaining systems are larger-than-local. Our drinking water is managed regionally, and so is energy production, waste management, and many of the "invisible" aspects of our lives. When considering how to make these systems resilient, we must think on a broader scale.
In other words, home is much bigger than the town we name in our mailing address.
It's certainly possible to think about preparing for the threats of the future--such as climate change and financial collapse--by creating walled-off enclaves of resilience. It's the "bunker" approach to security, and many in the 1% are already doing it.
But such an approach is morally abhorrent. It's also impractical. Equity and social justice are intrinsic to true resilience. Gated resilience that is only for the well-off breaks down when neighboring towns try to get basic needs met under challenging conditions. Many argue that inequality itself drives our sense of economic insecurity--especially among the very rich. More walls and more inequity will only exacerbate the cycle of fear and separation.
That's why we aspire to create a New England that welcomes all neighbors in need--whether from the town next door or around the globe. New England's regional activists also aspire to support a regional economy, since we believe this scale strikes the best balance between efficiency and resilience. Regional trade played a role in many low-energy, pre-industrial cultures to meet needs that could not be met locally. We're thinking about a "Whole New England Catalog"--reminiscent of the Whole Earth Catalog from the 1960s--both as a creative way to showcase what's already produced regionally, as well as to tell some great New England stories.
Last, and perhaps most important, we are getting to know our regional neighbors. New Englanders have gathered together at several region-wide gatherings to share stories and inspire each other. We've learned about everything from permaculture and herbal medicine to state banks, co-ops, and online outreach from each other.
The basic truth is that we're enriched by our connections. We want to enhance the web of relationships among us, and heal the divisions of race and class that have separated us. With resilient relationships in place, we're hopeful that New England can truly thrive--no matter what the future brings.