SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"In the case of Gaza, there is no political movement in the United States to support diplomacy to prevent war in the future," Naiman writes. (Photo: Elvert Barnes)
The greatest struggle facing the anti-war movement in the United States is the struggle to get people who come to anti-war demonstrations after a war starts to engage politically to prevent the same wars in the future. In the case of U.S. policy towards Iran, we created a political movement to support diplomacy with Iran to prevent war in the future. But in the case of Gaza, there is no political movement in the United States to support diplomacy to prevent war in the future.
Consider:
1. While Israel was bombing and invading Gaza, there were demonstrations across the United States against the war and against U.S. support for the war.
2. A key cause of the war was the blockade imposed on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza by Israel and Egypt. Exports from Gaza are virtually banned. Gaza is not allowed to use its seaport. Palestinians in Gaza can't travel normally to and from Gaza. They have to get permission from the Israeli or Egyptian governments that might never come, blocking their ability to work, study, receive medical care, and see their families.
3. It is generally acknowledged by experts that if current diplomacy fails to end the blockade of Gaza, it is inevitable that there will be another outbreak of violence on the Israel-Gaza border in the future.
4. The question of the Gaza blockade is on the table right now in the talks that have been talking place between Israel and the Palestinians in Cairo. Press reports suggest that it could go either way: there might be an agreement that ends the blockade, or there might not.
5. Thus, there are two likely paths out of the current juncture: either there will be an agreement in Cairo that ends the Gaza blockade, or there will be another war in the future, much like the one that people have been protesting; and which path happens is likely to be decisively shaped by what happens in the next few days of diplomacy in Cairo, a process on which the U.S. government obviously has significant influence.
Why can't we get the people who have protested the war to engage politically to prevent the same war from happening again in the future?
What would be worse than the killing of innocents that has happened so far? Doing nothing to stop the same killing of innocents in the future, when we had the ability to do something concrete to stop it.
Exactly two Members of Congress - Keith Ellison and Barbara Lee - have publicly called for ending the blockade now through negotiations.
Tell me: if the anti-war left would engage on the issue of the Gaza blockade, we couldn't get John Conyers to speak up for ending the blockade through diplomacy? We couldn't get Hank Johnson to speak up? Charlie Rangel, John Lewis, Danny Davis, Bobby Rush, Donna Edwards, Karen Bass, Maxine Waters, Eleanor Norton? None of them would speak up, if the anti-war left would engage politically?
Danny Glover took a #StandWithKeith:
\u201cI #StandWithKeith: CPC co-chair Rep. @KeithEllison: End the Gaza blockade to achieve peace https://t.co/5iDqut2Ivp\u201d— Danny Glover (@Danny Glover) 1407796824
Why won't the anti-war left #StandWithKeith?
You can take action here.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The greatest struggle facing the anti-war movement in the United States is the struggle to get people who come to anti-war demonstrations after a war starts to engage politically to prevent the same wars in the future. In the case of U.S. policy towards Iran, we created a political movement to support diplomacy with Iran to prevent war in the future. But in the case of Gaza, there is no political movement in the United States to support diplomacy to prevent war in the future.
Consider:
1. While Israel was bombing and invading Gaza, there were demonstrations across the United States against the war and against U.S. support for the war.
2. A key cause of the war was the blockade imposed on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza by Israel and Egypt. Exports from Gaza are virtually banned. Gaza is not allowed to use its seaport. Palestinians in Gaza can't travel normally to and from Gaza. They have to get permission from the Israeli or Egyptian governments that might never come, blocking their ability to work, study, receive medical care, and see their families.
3. It is generally acknowledged by experts that if current diplomacy fails to end the blockade of Gaza, it is inevitable that there will be another outbreak of violence on the Israel-Gaza border in the future.
4. The question of the Gaza blockade is on the table right now in the talks that have been talking place between Israel and the Palestinians in Cairo. Press reports suggest that it could go either way: there might be an agreement that ends the blockade, or there might not.
5. Thus, there are two likely paths out of the current juncture: either there will be an agreement in Cairo that ends the Gaza blockade, or there will be another war in the future, much like the one that people have been protesting; and which path happens is likely to be decisively shaped by what happens in the next few days of diplomacy in Cairo, a process on which the U.S. government obviously has significant influence.
Why can't we get the people who have protested the war to engage politically to prevent the same war from happening again in the future?
What would be worse than the killing of innocents that has happened so far? Doing nothing to stop the same killing of innocents in the future, when we had the ability to do something concrete to stop it.
Exactly two Members of Congress - Keith Ellison and Barbara Lee - have publicly called for ending the blockade now through negotiations.
Tell me: if the anti-war left would engage on the issue of the Gaza blockade, we couldn't get John Conyers to speak up for ending the blockade through diplomacy? We couldn't get Hank Johnson to speak up? Charlie Rangel, John Lewis, Danny Davis, Bobby Rush, Donna Edwards, Karen Bass, Maxine Waters, Eleanor Norton? None of them would speak up, if the anti-war left would engage politically?
Danny Glover took a #StandWithKeith:
\u201cI #StandWithKeith: CPC co-chair Rep. @KeithEllison: End the Gaza blockade to achieve peace https://t.co/5iDqut2Ivp\u201d— Danny Glover (@Danny Glover) 1407796824
Why won't the anti-war left #StandWithKeith?
You can take action here.
The greatest struggle facing the anti-war movement in the United States is the struggle to get people who come to anti-war demonstrations after a war starts to engage politically to prevent the same wars in the future. In the case of U.S. policy towards Iran, we created a political movement to support diplomacy with Iran to prevent war in the future. But in the case of Gaza, there is no political movement in the United States to support diplomacy to prevent war in the future.
Consider:
1. While Israel was bombing and invading Gaza, there were demonstrations across the United States against the war and against U.S. support for the war.
2. A key cause of the war was the blockade imposed on 1.8 million Palestinians in Gaza by Israel and Egypt. Exports from Gaza are virtually banned. Gaza is not allowed to use its seaport. Palestinians in Gaza can't travel normally to and from Gaza. They have to get permission from the Israeli or Egyptian governments that might never come, blocking their ability to work, study, receive medical care, and see their families.
3. It is generally acknowledged by experts that if current diplomacy fails to end the blockade of Gaza, it is inevitable that there will be another outbreak of violence on the Israel-Gaza border in the future.
4. The question of the Gaza blockade is on the table right now in the talks that have been talking place between Israel and the Palestinians in Cairo. Press reports suggest that it could go either way: there might be an agreement that ends the blockade, or there might not.
5. Thus, there are two likely paths out of the current juncture: either there will be an agreement in Cairo that ends the Gaza blockade, or there will be another war in the future, much like the one that people have been protesting; and which path happens is likely to be decisively shaped by what happens in the next few days of diplomacy in Cairo, a process on which the U.S. government obviously has significant influence.
Why can't we get the people who have protested the war to engage politically to prevent the same war from happening again in the future?
What would be worse than the killing of innocents that has happened so far? Doing nothing to stop the same killing of innocents in the future, when we had the ability to do something concrete to stop it.
Exactly two Members of Congress - Keith Ellison and Barbara Lee - have publicly called for ending the blockade now through negotiations.
Tell me: if the anti-war left would engage on the issue of the Gaza blockade, we couldn't get John Conyers to speak up for ending the blockade through diplomacy? We couldn't get Hank Johnson to speak up? Charlie Rangel, John Lewis, Danny Davis, Bobby Rush, Donna Edwards, Karen Bass, Maxine Waters, Eleanor Norton? None of them would speak up, if the anti-war left would engage politically?
Danny Glover took a #StandWithKeith:
\u201cI #StandWithKeith: CPC co-chair Rep. @KeithEllison: End the Gaza blockade to achieve peace https://t.co/5iDqut2Ivp\u201d— Danny Glover (@Danny Glover) 1407796824
Why won't the anti-war left #StandWithKeith?
You can take action here.