SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"We have to fight for our children's education."
Those words, from Philadelphia parent Kia Hinton, crystalized a national sentiment expressed during a Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education held on December 9 in over 100 sites across the country.
"We have to fight for our children's education."
Those words, from Philadelphia parent Kia Hinton, crystalized a national sentiment expressed during a Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education held on December 9 in over 100 sites across the country.
The multiple events - held from Maine to San Francisco, New Orleans to Minneapolis/St. Paul - constituted "the largest coordinated action to reclaim the promise of public education in recent memory," according to a statement from the American Federation of Teachers, a lead organizer and sponsor of the various actions.
The events took on many forms - from street protests and rallies to town halls and news conferences - but there were common grievances overlapping the events.
Whether they were teachers calling out unfair evaluations, parents decrying of high-stakes testing, or students criticizing unfair discipline policies, they all expressed feelings of being no longer in control of their education destinies.
And numerous voices in the audiences of these events pointed to governing policies that increasingly are perceived as being driven by corruption and profit making rather than the best interest of students.
Voices From The Streets
At a protest rally in Pittsburgh, a local organizer complained, "Our kids have lost kindergarten, music [and] art ... We want smaller class sizes...we want our librarians back."
At a protest in Syracuse, a representative from a parent group stated, "Not every child gets the same kind of education in New York state ... It depends on who you're born to and where they live, what kind of opportunities are available to you, and that's not just right ... It's not fair and it doesn't serve our society."
A parent speaking at the event in Newark, New Jersey, urged the audience to take back the control of local schools that are now governed by an unelected board. "We need to get back our local control," she said. "No one's held accountable. They get to do everything they want."
Protestors in New Orleans staged their event in front of a school scheduled for closure, which will force parents into the district's complicated and unfair "choice" system that sends many NOLA students to distant campuses in other parts of town.
"Why do I have to look elsewhere if I shop here, if I pay taxes here, if I live here?" one of the organizers said. "It's not a failing school. It's a failing system that set up this school."
In Columbus, Ohio, reporters described an audience of "educators, parents, labor, and faith leaders" who protested Governor John Kasich's record of cutting school spending, "while giving money to failing, for-profit charter schools."
In Chicago, a protest organizer, Jonathan Stith of the Alliance for Educational Justice, complained of "current school reform efforts by corporate education profiteers" that have "bankrupted public education."
Just How Big
The wide range of locations for Monday's events, and the numbers of participants, are testament to the breadth and depth of complaints about current education policies.
In New York state, events were held in Nyack, Albany, Binghamton, Rochester, Syracuse, New York City, Yonkers, and the Buffalo suburb of West Seneca.
In Washington D.C., "close to 600 people" endured inclement weather and "packed a high school auditorium ... to ask questions of the leading mayoral candidates and serve notice that the community is united behind 'putting the public back in public education.'"
In Philadelphia, according to the local news report that quoted Hinton, crowds of parents, students, and advocates rallied outside the regional office of Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett, calling for increased funding for that could help with the city's endless budget crisis.
"The turnout so big, they took over South Broad Street and forced the street to shut down," the reporter said.
Cross state, in Pittsburgh, local press reported, "more than 100'' people gathered outside the governor's local office to listen to speakers, chant slogans, and wave signs that read, "Education Not for Sale" and "Support Funding for Public Education."
According to a local news report from Chicago, "A couple hundred parents, students, and teachers braved the frigid night air on Monday to deliver their holiday wish list to Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Governor Pat Quinn: Stop school closings, end the privatization of neighborhood public schools, and eliminate mayoral control of the school board."
At the event in Newark, "some 200 advocates marched to the Newark Public Schools offices and to City Hall."
"More than 300 supporters gathered," in Austin, Texas, "to hear speakers address the most pressing issues in Texas schools, including education equity and comprehensive immigration reform."
In San Francisco, "Over 200 people came out to take a stand" for public education and local schools.
A Mandate From The Progressive Movement
What's also clear about Monday's events is that there is widespread evidence that public education has become a rallying point for a huge cross section of the progressive community, including labor leaders, educators, clergy, members of immigrant communities, civil rights activists, representatives from grassroots student and parent groups, and community organizers fighting for fair housing, economic fairness, and other causes.
Many of the participants in Monday's Day of Action may not have been aware that the impetus for their event began in a hotel in downtown Los Angeles in October - a mere two months prior to this national outpouring.
At that meeting - billed as a combined "organizing summit" and a "conference on civil, human, and women's rights" - hundreds of activists and organizers gathered to voice a common commitment to public education and to plan specific courses of action to disrupt what most in the audience described as a "corporate model of school reform."
Those 500 or so attendees provided the catalyst for Monday's events and unified them under a document proclaiming "The Principles That Unite Us".
No one at any of these events spoke about quick wins or easy success.
One of the organizers of the Chicago event, Jitu Brown from the city's South Side, said, "It's not about doing action and then by magic conditions change ... We're setting the tone change by having parents, teachers, and communities come together around a common set of principles. It's a marathon, not a sprint."
Indeed, given Monday's massive showing, the movement to change directions in education policies appears to only be getting started.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
"We have to fight for our children's education."
Those words, from Philadelphia parent Kia Hinton, crystalized a national sentiment expressed during a Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education held on December 9 in over 100 sites across the country.
The multiple events - held from Maine to San Francisco, New Orleans to Minneapolis/St. Paul - constituted "the largest coordinated action to reclaim the promise of public education in recent memory," according to a statement from the American Federation of Teachers, a lead organizer and sponsor of the various actions.
The events took on many forms - from street protests and rallies to town halls and news conferences - but there were common grievances overlapping the events.
Whether they were teachers calling out unfair evaluations, parents decrying of high-stakes testing, or students criticizing unfair discipline policies, they all expressed feelings of being no longer in control of their education destinies.
And numerous voices in the audiences of these events pointed to governing policies that increasingly are perceived as being driven by corruption and profit making rather than the best interest of students.
Voices From The Streets
At a protest rally in Pittsburgh, a local organizer complained, "Our kids have lost kindergarten, music [and] art ... We want smaller class sizes...we want our librarians back."
At a protest in Syracuse, a representative from a parent group stated, "Not every child gets the same kind of education in New York state ... It depends on who you're born to and where they live, what kind of opportunities are available to you, and that's not just right ... It's not fair and it doesn't serve our society."
A parent speaking at the event in Newark, New Jersey, urged the audience to take back the control of local schools that are now governed by an unelected board. "We need to get back our local control," she said. "No one's held accountable. They get to do everything they want."
Protestors in New Orleans staged their event in front of a school scheduled for closure, which will force parents into the district's complicated and unfair "choice" system that sends many NOLA students to distant campuses in other parts of town.
"Why do I have to look elsewhere if I shop here, if I pay taxes here, if I live here?" one of the organizers said. "It's not a failing school. It's a failing system that set up this school."
In Columbus, Ohio, reporters described an audience of "educators, parents, labor, and faith leaders" who protested Governor John Kasich's record of cutting school spending, "while giving money to failing, for-profit charter schools."
In Chicago, a protest organizer, Jonathan Stith of the Alliance for Educational Justice, complained of "current school reform efforts by corporate education profiteers" that have "bankrupted public education."
Just How Big
The wide range of locations for Monday's events, and the numbers of participants, are testament to the breadth and depth of complaints about current education policies.
In New York state, events were held in Nyack, Albany, Binghamton, Rochester, Syracuse, New York City, Yonkers, and the Buffalo suburb of West Seneca.
In Washington D.C., "close to 600 people" endured inclement weather and "packed a high school auditorium ... to ask questions of the leading mayoral candidates and serve notice that the community is united behind 'putting the public back in public education.'"
In Philadelphia, according to the local news report that quoted Hinton, crowds of parents, students, and advocates rallied outside the regional office of Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett, calling for increased funding for that could help with the city's endless budget crisis.
"The turnout so big, they took over South Broad Street and forced the street to shut down," the reporter said.
Cross state, in Pittsburgh, local press reported, "more than 100'' people gathered outside the governor's local office to listen to speakers, chant slogans, and wave signs that read, "Education Not for Sale" and "Support Funding for Public Education."
According to a local news report from Chicago, "A couple hundred parents, students, and teachers braved the frigid night air on Monday to deliver their holiday wish list to Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Governor Pat Quinn: Stop school closings, end the privatization of neighborhood public schools, and eliminate mayoral control of the school board."
At the event in Newark, "some 200 advocates marched to the Newark Public Schools offices and to City Hall."
"More than 300 supporters gathered," in Austin, Texas, "to hear speakers address the most pressing issues in Texas schools, including education equity and comprehensive immigration reform."
In San Francisco, "Over 200 people came out to take a stand" for public education and local schools.
A Mandate From The Progressive Movement
What's also clear about Monday's events is that there is widespread evidence that public education has become a rallying point for a huge cross section of the progressive community, including labor leaders, educators, clergy, members of immigrant communities, civil rights activists, representatives from grassroots student and parent groups, and community organizers fighting for fair housing, economic fairness, and other causes.
Many of the participants in Monday's Day of Action may not have been aware that the impetus for their event began in a hotel in downtown Los Angeles in October - a mere two months prior to this national outpouring.
At that meeting - billed as a combined "organizing summit" and a "conference on civil, human, and women's rights" - hundreds of activists and organizers gathered to voice a common commitment to public education and to plan specific courses of action to disrupt what most in the audience described as a "corporate model of school reform."
Those 500 or so attendees provided the catalyst for Monday's events and unified them under a document proclaiming "The Principles That Unite Us".
No one at any of these events spoke about quick wins or easy success.
One of the organizers of the Chicago event, Jitu Brown from the city's South Side, said, "It's not about doing action and then by magic conditions change ... We're setting the tone change by having parents, teachers, and communities come together around a common set of principles. It's a marathon, not a sprint."
Indeed, given Monday's massive showing, the movement to change directions in education policies appears to only be getting started.
"We have to fight for our children's education."
Those words, from Philadelphia parent Kia Hinton, crystalized a national sentiment expressed during a Day of Action to Reclaim the Promise of Public Education held on December 9 in over 100 sites across the country.
The multiple events - held from Maine to San Francisco, New Orleans to Minneapolis/St. Paul - constituted "the largest coordinated action to reclaim the promise of public education in recent memory," according to a statement from the American Federation of Teachers, a lead organizer and sponsor of the various actions.
The events took on many forms - from street protests and rallies to town halls and news conferences - but there were common grievances overlapping the events.
Whether they were teachers calling out unfair evaluations, parents decrying of high-stakes testing, or students criticizing unfair discipline policies, they all expressed feelings of being no longer in control of their education destinies.
And numerous voices in the audiences of these events pointed to governing policies that increasingly are perceived as being driven by corruption and profit making rather than the best interest of students.
Voices From The Streets
At a protest rally in Pittsburgh, a local organizer complained, "Our kids have lost kindergarten, music [and] art ... We want smaller class sizes...we want our librarians back."
At a protest in Syracuse, a representative from a parent group stated, "Not every child gets the same kind of education in New York state ... It depends on who you're born to and where they live, what kind of opportunities are available to you, and that's not just right ... It's not fair and it doesn't serve our society."
A parent speaking at the event in Newark, New Jersey, urged the audience to take back the control of local schools that are now governed by an unelected board. "We need to get back our local control," she said. "No one's held accountable. They get to do everything they want."
Protestors in New Orleans staged their event in front of a school scheduled for closure, which will force parents into the district's complicated and unfair "choice" system that sends many NOLA students to distant campuses in other parts of town.
"Why do I have to look elsewhere if I shop here, if I pay taxes here, if I live here?" one of the organizers said. "It's not a failing school. It's a failing system that set up this school."
In Columbus, Ohio, reporters described an audience of "educators, parents, labor, and faith leaders" who protested Governor John Kasich's record of cutting school spending, "while giving money to failing, for-profit charter schools."
In Chicago, a protest organizer, Jonathan Stith of the Alliance for Educational Justice, complained of "current school reform efforts by corporate education profiteers" that have "bankrupted public education."
Just How Big
The wide range of locations for Monday's events, and the numbers of participants, are testament to the breadth and depth of complaints about current education policies.
In New York state, events were held in Nyack, Albany, Binghamton, Rochester, Syracuse, New York City, Yonkers, and the Buffalo suburb of West Seneca.
In Washington D.C., "close to 600 people" endured inclement weather and "packed a high school auditorium ... to ask questions of the leading mayoral candidates and serve notice that the community is united behind 'putting the public back in public education.'"
In Philadelphia, according to the local news report that quoted Hinton, crowds of parents, students, and advocates rallied outside the regional office of Pennsylvania governor Tom Corbett, calling for increased funding for that could help with the city's endless budget crisis.
"The turnout so big, they took over South Broad Street and forced the street to shut down," the reporter said.
Cross state, in Pittsburgh, local press reported, "more than 100'' people gathered outside the governor's local office to listen to speakers, chant slogans, and wave signs that read, "Education Not for Sale" and "Support Funding for Public Education."
According to a local news report from Chicago, "A couple hundred parents, students, and teachers braved the frigid night air on Monday to deliver their holiday wish list to Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Governor Pat Quinn: Stop school closings, end the privatization of neighborhood public schools, and eliminate mayoral control of the school board."
At the event in Newark, "some 200 advocates marched to the Newark Public Schools offices and to City Hall."
"More than 300 supporters gathered," in Austin, Texas, "to hear speakers address the most pressing issues in Texas schools, including education equity and comprehensive immigration reform."
In San Francisco, "Over 200 people came out to take a stand" for public education and local schools.
A Mandate From The Progressive Movement
What's also clear about Monday's events is that there is widespread evidence that public education has become a rallying point for a huge cross section of the progressive community, including labor leaders, educators, clergy, members of immigrant communities, civil rights activists, representatives from grassroots student and parent groups, and community organizers fighting for fair housing, economic fairness, and other causes.
Many of the participants in Monday's Day of Action may not have been aware that the impetus for their event began in a hotel in downtown Los Angeles in October - a mere two months prior to this national outpouring.
At that meeting - billed as a combined "organizing summit" and a "conference on civil, human, and women's rights" - hundreds of activists and organizers gathered to voice a common commitment to public education and to plan specific courses of action to disrupt what most in the audience described as a "corporate model of school reform."
Those 500 or so attendees provided the catalyst for Monday's events and unified them under a document proclaiming "The Principles That Unite Us".
No one at any of these events spoke about quick wins or easy success.
One of the organizers of the Chicago event, Jitu Brown from the city's South Side, said, "It's not about doing action and then by magic conditions change ... We're setting the tone change by having parents, teachers, and communities come together around a common set of principles. It's a marathon, not a sprint."
Indeed, given Monday's massive showing, the movement to change directions in education policies appears to only be getting started.
Aharon Haliva, the former head of military intelligence in Israel, said in his vengeful remarks that it "doesn't matter now if they are children."
Those who listened to the 22-minute speech given by a South African attorney as part of the country's genocide case against Israel at the United Nations' top court in January 2024 have long been well aware that Israeli officials have openly made genocidal statements about their military assault on Gaza—but a recording broadcast by an Israeli news channel on Sunday revealed what The Guardian called an "unusually direct description of collective punishment of civilians" by a high-level general.
Aharon Haliva, the general who led Israel's military intelligence operations on October 7, 2023 when Hamas led an attack on the country, was heard in a recording broadcast by Channel 12 that "for everything that happened on October 7, for every person on October 7, 50 Palestinians must die."
"The fact that there are already 50,000 dead in Gaza is necessary and required for future generations," said Haliva in comments that were made "in recent months," according to Channel 12. "It doesn't matter now if they are children."
More than 62,000 Palestinians have now been killed in Israel's airstrikes and ground assault on Gaza since October 7, according to the Health Ministry in Gaza, with more than 250 people having died of malnutrition due to Israel's near-total blockade on humanitarian aid. The official death toll figures put out by officials in Gaza is believed by many to be a severe undercount.
The Israel Defense Forces' own data recently showed that only about 20,000 militants are among those who have been killed by Israeli forces—even as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and both Republican and Democratic leaders in the United States, the top international funder of the IDF, continue to insist that the military is targeting Hamas.
Haliva, who stepped down from leading military intelligence in April 2024, added in his comments that Palestinians "need a Nakba every now and then to feel the price"—a reference to the forced displacement of more than 700,000 Palestinians from their homes, the killing of about 15,000 people, and the destruction of more than 500 Palestinian towns when the state of Israel was created in 1948.
Notably, The Guardian reported that Haliva is "widely seen as a centrist critic of the current government and its far-right ministers such as Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir," whose genocidal statements about Gaza and the West Bank have been widely reported.
When arguing South Africa's genocide case at the International Court of Justice in January 2024, attorney Tembeka Ngcukaitobi catalogued a number of statements made by Netanyahu, the IDF, and his top Israeli ministers, including:
The Israeli human rights group B'Tselem, which said last month that it had determined Netanyahu's government is committing genocide in Gaza, said Haliva's remarks "are part of a long line of official statements that expose a deliberate policy of genocide."
"For 22 months, Israel has pursued a policy of systematically destroying Palestinian life in Gaza," said B'Tselem. "This is genocide. It is happening now. It must be stopped."
The Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor added that Haliva openly admitted "what Israel tries to deny: genocide is not a byproduct of war but the goal."
Haliva's remark about the necessity of repeating the Nakba in Gaza "reveals a clear intention: The bloodshed is not meant to stop, but to be repeated."
Nihad Awad, national executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said Haliva's statement "is not just evidence of genocidal rhetoric, it is a blueprint for genocidal action" that must push the US government to end its support for Israel.
"The Trump administration and the international community can no longer turn a blind eye," said Awad. "President [Donald] Trump and Congress cannot continue to claim they do not know or deny what the entire world is seeing every hour of every day. The United States must immediately halt all military aid and support to Israel and demand accountability for war crimes committed in Gaza. Silence is complicity."
Any such effort, said one democracy watchdog, "would violate the Constitution and is a major step to prevent free and fair elections."
In his latest full-frontal assault on democratic access and voting rights, President Donald Trump early Monday said he will lead an effort to ban both mail-in ballots and voting machines for next year's mid-term elections—a vow met with immediate rebuke from progressive critics.
"I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we’re at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump wrote in a social media post infested with lies and falsehoods.
Trump falsely claimed that no other country in the world uses mail-in voting—a blatant lie, according to International IDEA, which monitors democratic trends worldwide, at least 34 nations allow for in-country postal voting of some kind. The group notes that over 100 countries allow out-of-country postal voting for citizens living or stationed overseas during an election.
Trump has repeated his false claim—over and over again—that he won the 2020 election, which he actually lost, in part due to fraud related to mail-in ballots, though the lie has been debunked ad nauseam. He also fails to note that mail-in ballots were very much in use nationwide in 2024, with an estimated 30% of voters casting a mail-in ballot as opposed to in-person during the election in which Trump returned to the White House and Republicans took back the US Senate and retained the US House of Representatives.
Monday's rant by Trump came just days after his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who Trump claimed commented personally on the 2020 election and mail-in ballots. In a Friday night interview with Fox News, Trump claimed "one of the most interesting" things Putin said during their talks about ending the war in Ukraine was about mail-in voting in the United States and how Trump would have won the election were it not for voter fraud, echoing Trump's own disproven claims.
Trump: Vladimir Putin said your election was rigged because you have mail-in voting… he talked about 2020 and he said you won that election by so much.. it was a rigged election. pic.twitter.com/m8v0tXuiDQ
— Acyn (@Acyn) August 16, 2025
Trump said Monday he would sign an executive order on election processes, suggesting that it would forbid mail-in ballots as well as the automatic tabulation machines used in states nationwide. He also said that states, which are in charge of administering their elections at the local level, "must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do."
Marc Elias, founder of Democracy Docket, which tracks voting rights and issues related to ballot access, said any executive order by Trump to end mail-in voting or forbid provenly safe and accurate voting machines ahead of the midterms would be "unconstitutional and illegal."
Such an effort, said Elias, "would violate the Constitution and is a major step to prevent free and fair elections."
"We've got the FBI patrolling the streets." said one protester. "We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Residents of Washington, DC over the weekend demonstrated against US President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard in their city.
As reported by NBC Washington, demonstrators gathered on Saturday at DuPont Circle and then marched to the White House to direct their anger at Trump for sending the National Guard to Washington DC, and for his efforts to take over the Metropolitan Police Department.
In an interview with NBC Washington, one protester said that it was important for the administration to see that residents weren't intimidated by the presence of military personnel roaming their streets.
"I know a lot of people are scared," the protester said. "We've got the FBI patrolling the streets. We've got National Guard set up as a show of force. What's scarier is if we allow this."
Saturday protests against the presence of the National Guard are expected to be a weekly occurrence, organizers told NBC Washington.
Hours after the march to the White House, other demonstrators began to gather at Union Station to protest the presence of the National Guard units there. Audio obtained by freelance journalist Andrew Leyden reveals that the National Guard decided to move their forces out of the area in reaction to what dispatchers called "growing demonstrations."
Even residents who didn't take part in formal demonstrations over the weekend managed to express their displeasure with the National Guard patrolling the city. According to The Washington Post, locals who spent a night on the town in the U Street neighborhood on Friday night made their unhappiness with law enforcement in the city very well known.
"At the sight of local and federal law enforcement throughout the night, people pooled on the sidewalk—watching, filming, booing," wrote the Post. "Such interactions played out again and again as the night drew on. Onlookers heckled the police as they did their job and applauded as officers left."
Trump last week ordered the National Guard into Washington, DC and tried to take control the Metropolitan Police, purportedly in order to reduce crime in the city. Statistics released earlier this year, however, showed a significant drop in crime in the nation's capital.