SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's "Giving Tuesday" on December 3. Following Black Friday, on Giving Tuesday, people all across the United States will be kicking off the holiday season not with shopping, they say, but with giving.
It's "Giving Tuesday" on December 3. Following Black Friday, on Giving Tuesday, people all across the United States will be kicking off the holiday season not with shopping, they say, but with giving.
Don't get me wrong, GRITtv is viewer supported. We're all for charitable giving, and every day, we're reminded of just how much generosity is out there. This year, an anonymous donor enabled us to hire a third team member and start a podcast. We thank that donor daily.
But the massive corporations taking part in Giving Tuesday aren't anonymous. They want positive pr, and for that they deserve serious scrutiny.
Take Verizon. For Giving Tuesday, the Verizon Foundation says it will contribute to three large non-profits as directed by the votes of Verizon workers. The company calls it giving back and "giving voice" to employees.
Call me cynical, but I bet most Verizon workers would have preferred more voice and fewer give-backs in their contracts. Over the last decade Verizon's forced concessions on everything from wages to pensions to job security and the right to organize. Giving Tuesday's nice but Verizon workers give back every day.
It's the same with Google. Google's co-hosting a Giving Tuesday "Hangout-a-thon" for charities and socially conscious businesses. Lovely, but if they had a real social conscience, Google would let less of its wealth hang out in tax shelters. Last year, Google dodged about $2 billion in income taxes by funneling revenues into a Bermuda shell company. What they give on Tuesday will be pennies on what they'd owe if they were to pay their fair share on tax day. And poor taxpayers might need less charity.
At Microsoft, well, at Microsoft, they're matching dollar for dollar the contributions given to a group of youth charities on Giving Tuesday. It must be some mistake, but I've read the site five times and it seems to me that the tenth most profitable corporation in the world has set a goal for the GivingTuesday campaign of just $50,000.
As the Verizon Foundation puts it, on Giving Tuesday "giving back has never been easier." For huge corporations, it's also never been cheaper.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
It's "Giving Tuesday" on December 3. Following Black Friday, on Giving Tuesday, people all across the United States will be kicking off the holiday season not with shopping, they say, but with giving.
Don't get me wrong, GRITtv is viewer supported. We're all for charitable giving, and every day, we're reminded of just how much generosity is out there. This year, an anonymous donor enabled us to hire a third team member and start a podcast. We thank that donor daily.
But the massive corporations taking part in Giving Tuesday aren't anonymous. They want positive pr, and for that they deserve serious scrutiny.
Take Verizon. For Giving Tuesday, the Verizon Foundation says it will contribute to three large non-profits as directed by the votes of Verizon workers. The company calls it giving back and "giving voice" to employees.
Call me cynical, but I bet most Verizon workers would have preferred more voice and fewer give-backs in their contracts. Over the last decade Verizon's forced concessions on everything from wages to pensions to job security and the right to organize. Giving Tuesday's nice but Verizon workers give back every day.
It's the same with Google. Google's co-hosting a Giving Tuesday "Hangout-a-thon" for charities and socially conscious businesses. Lovely, but if they had a real social conscience, Google would let less of its wealth hang out in tax shelters. Last year, Google dodged about $2 billion in income taxes by funneling revenues into a Bermuda shell company. What they give on Tuesday will be pennies on what they'd owe if they were to pay their fair share on tax day. And poor taxpayers might need less charity.
At Microsoft, well, at Microsoft, they're matching dollar for dollar the contributions given to a group of youth charities on Giving Tuesday. It must be some mistake, but I've read the site five times and it seems to me that the tenth most profitable corporation in the world has set a goal for the GivingTuesday campaign of just $50,000.
As the Verizon Foundation puts it, on Giving Tuesday "giving back has never been easier." For huge corporations, it's also never been cheaper.
It's "Giving Tuesday" on December 3. Following Black Friday, on Giving Tuesday, people all across the United States will be kicking off the holiday season not with shopping, they say, but with giving.
Don't get me wrong, GRITtv is viewer supported. We're all for charitable giving, and every day, we're reminded of just how much generosity is out there. This year, an anonymous donor enabled us to hire a third team member and start a podcast. We thank that donor daily.
But the massive corporations taking part in Giving Tuesday aren't anonymous. They want positive pr, and for that they deserve serious scrutiny.
Take Verizon. For Giving Tuesday, the Verizon Foundation says it will contribute to three large non-profits as directed by the votes of Verizon workers. The company calls it giving back and "giving voice" to employees.
Call me cynical, but I bet most Verizon workers would have preferred more voice and fewer give-backs in their contracts. Over the last decade Verizon's forced concessions on everything from wages to pensions to job security and the right to organize. Giving Tuesday's nice but Verizon workers give back every day.
It's the same with Google. Google's co-hosting a Giving Tuesday "Hangout-a-thon" for charities and socially conscious businesses. Lovely, but if they had a real social conscience, Google would let less of its wealth hang out in tax shelters. Last year, Google dodged about $2 billion in income taxes by funneling revenues into a Bermuda shell company. What they give on Tuesday will be pennies on what they'd owe if they were to pay their fair share on tax day. And poor taxpayers might need less charity.
At Microsoft, well, at Microsoft, they're matching dollar for dollar the contributions given to a group of youth charities on Giving Tuesday. It must be some mistake, but I've read the site five times and it seems to me that the tenth most profitable corporation in the world has set a goal for the GivingTuesday campaign of just $50,000.
As the Verizon Foundation puts it, on Giving Tuesday "giving back has never been easier." For huge corporations, it's also never been cheaper.