James Cole: "Of Course We'd Like Records of People Buying" Pressure Cookers
Now that the Suffolk cops have revealed they investigated Michele Catalano's family because of a tip from her husband's former employer about his Google searches and not FBI or NSA analysis of Google data themselves, a lot of people are suggesting it would be crazy to imagine that the Feds might have found Catalano via online searches.
Now that the Suffolk cops have revealed they investigated Michele Catalano's family because of a tip from her husband's former employer about his Google searches and not FBI or NSA analysis of Google data themselves, a lot of people are suggesting it would be crazy to imagine that the Feds might have found Catalano via online searches.
Which is funny. Because just a day before this story broke, this exchange happened in the Senate between Senate Judiciary Chair Patrick Leahy and Deputy Attorney General James Cole. (after 1:45, though just before this exchange Leahy asks whether DOJ could use Section 215 to obtain URLs and bookmarks, among other records, which Cole didn't deny)
Leahy: But if our phone records are relevant, why wouldn't our credit card records? Wouldn't you like to know if somebody's buying, um, what is the fertilizer used in bombs?
Cole: I may not need to collect everybody's credit card records in order to do that.
[snip]
If somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs of course we would like to know that but we may not need to do it in this fashion.
This is not a surprise. It comes two years after Robert Mueller confirmed they use Section 215 to collect "records relating to the purchase of hydrogen peroxide," a TATP precursor.
So while we may not know how the government currently collects records relating to the purchase of fertilizer, acetone, hydrogen peroxide or -- yes, after Boston, probably also pressure cookers and maybe even fireworks -- and we don't know just how broadly it collects such records, we do know that "of course" DOJ "would like to know ... if somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs."
So just one day ago, Cole didn't deny they could use Section 215 to get search URLs, he affirmed they would want to get records of bomb-making materials.
He just didn't tell us how they might do those things.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Now that the Suffolk cops have revealed they investigated Michele Catalano's family because of a tip from her husband's former employer about his Google searches and not FBI or NSA analysis of Google data themselves, a lot of people are suggesting it would be crazy to imagine that the Feds might have found Catalano via online searches.
Which is funny. Because just a day before this story broke, this exchange happened in the Senate between Senate Judiciary Chair Patrick Leahy and Deputy Attorney General James Cole. (after 1:45, though just before this exchange Leahy asks whether DOJ could use Section 215 to obtain URLs and bookmarks, among other records, which Cole didn't deny)
Leahy: But if our phone records are relevant, why wouldn't our credit card records? Wouldn't you like to know if somebody's buying, um, what is the fertilizer used in bombs?
Cole: I may not need to collect everybody's credit card records in order to do that.
[snip]
If somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs of course we would like to know that but we may not need to do it in this fashion.
This is not a surprise. It comes two years after Robert Mueller confirmed they use Section 215 to collect "records relating to the purchase of hydrogen peroxide," a TATP precursor.
So while we may not know how the government currently collects records relating to the purchase of fertilizer, acetone, hydrogen peroxide or -- yes, after Boston, probably also pressure cookers and maybe even fireworks -- and we don't know just how broadly it collects such records, we do know that "of course" DOJ "would like to know ... if somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs."
So just one day ago, Cole didn't deny they could use Section 215 to get search URLs, he affirmed they would want to get records of bomb-making materials.
He just didn't tell us how they might do those things.
Now that the Suffolk cops have revealed they investigated Michele Catalano's family because of a tip from her husband's former employer about his Google searches and not FBI or NSA analysis of Google data themselves, a lot of people are suggesting it would be crazy to imagine that the Feds might have found Catalano via online searches.
Which is funny. Because just a day before this story broke, this exchange happened in the Senate between Senate Judiciary Chair Patrick Leahy and Deputy Attorney General James Cole. (after 1:45, though just before this exchange Leahy asks whether DOJ could use Section 215 to obtain URLs and bookmarks, among other records, which Cole didn't deny)
Leahy: But if our phone records are relevant, why wouldn't our credit card records? Wouldn't you like to know if somebody's buying, um, what is the fertilizer used in bombs?
Cole: I may not need to collect everybody's credit card records in order to do that.
[snip]
If somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs of course we would like to know that but we may not need to do it in this fashion.
This is not a surprise. It comes two years after Robert Mueller confirmed they use Section 215 to collect "records relating to the purchase of hydrogen peroxide," a TATP precursor.
So while we may not know how the government currently collects records relating to the purchase of fertilizer, acetone, hydrogen peroxide or -- yes, after Boston, probably also pressure cookers and maybe even fireworks -- and we don't know just how broadly it collects such records, we do know that "of course" DOJ "would like to know ... if somebody's buying things that could be used to make bombs."
So just one day ago, Cole didn't deny they could use Section 215 to get search URLs, he affirmed they would want to get records of bomb-making materials.
He just didn't tell us how they might do those things.