May 29, 2013
If you were a corporation and wanted to influence government for your own benefit, choosing to persuade judges is a far easier task (and less expensive) than persuading Congress or the White House. Although, Monsanto recently made headlines when they partnered with Senator Roy Blunt to sneak protections for the GMO industry into a recently passed appropriations act, success like this is hard earned in the legislature. Now Monsanto faces what will be a highly publicized repeal effort.
The ability to persuade Judges has immediate benefits. Say, for instance, that your negligence accidentally results in an oil-rig blowing up, killing several workers onboard, and dumping millions of barrels of crude oil in the Gulf of Mexico. It's much more expedient to have a judge use creative interpretation of existing law to find in your favor during the consequential lawsuits. It would just be awkward to pursue new legislation to save your tail after the incident had already occurred. Risk adverse corporate giants either recognize the benefits of having courts side with them in these situations, or they are simply big supporters of educating our judges.
According to a recent investigation by the Center for Public Integrity, "conservative foundations, multinational oil companies and a prescription drug maker were the most frequent sponsors of more than 100 expense-paid educational seminars attended by federal judges over a 4 1/2-year period." About 185 federal judges participated in these "educational" events which were sponsored by multinational corporations such as ExxonMobil, Pfizer and BP.
These seminars are clearly designed to encourage judicial principles that would benefit the sponsors. According to the investigators, Justice Carl A. Barbier happens to have attended at least one of these conferences in 2009, which was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute, Shell Oil Company, and Exxon Mobil Corporation. Barbier has since dismissed a wrongful death case against Exxon and now finds himself presiding over the BP Deepwater Horizon cases. In an ongoing trial, it is up to him to determine whether or not BP is grossly negligent and liable for tens of billions of dollars in Clean Water Act damages.
Sponsoring seminars and conferences are not the only ways that profiteers have found a way to interact with the judiciary. Pennsylvania Judges Mark Ciavarilla Jr. and Michael Conahan are respectively serving 28 year and 18 year prison sentences after being accused of accepting millions of dollars from the private prison industry and subsequently handing out harsh juvenile sentences to fill their cells.
Corporate influence has been growing within our government for many years, along with policies that have upwardly redistributed greater portions of the nation's treasure and resources to the already wealthy. Through judicial ruling, corporations have attained "legal personhood" and the same inherent rights that are endowed upon people. They have used those rights to insert themselves into our electoral and legislative processes, and have found in the judiciary another pathway to ensure their interests are served.
Perhaps the silver lining to the corporate storm cloud, which brought us the economic crash of 2008, is that most Americans have awakened to the fact that our democracy is suffering under the weight of corporate personhood. Many of them are making efforts to reverse the trend. One way people are making a difference is by volunteering with Move to Amend, The Campaign to End Corporate Personhood.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap
Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap is national director of Move to Amend and an active member of Extinction Rebellion. She has served as a local elected official, campaign organizer, trainer, facilitator and mediator, and coordinated numerous grassroots and national projects and organizations.
Sabina Khan
Sabina Khan is a Communications Intern with the Move to Amend Coalition. She blogs at Express Tribune and can be reached at sabinak@movetoamend.org.
If you were a corporation and wanted to influence government for your own benefit, choosing to persuade judges is a far easier task (and less expensive) than persuading Congress or the White House. Although, Monsanto recently made headlines when they partnered with Senator Roy Blunt to sneak protections for the GMO industry into a recently passed appropriations act, success like this is hard earned in the legislature. Now Monsanto faces what will be a highly publicized repeal effort.
The ability to persuade Judges has immediate benefits. Say, for instance, that your negligence accidentally results in an oil-rig blowing up, killing several workers onboard, and dumping millions of barrels of crude oil in the Gulf of Mexico. It's much more expedient to have a judge use creative interpretation of existing law to find in your favor during the consequential lawsuits. It would just be awkward to pursue new legislation to save your tail after the incident had already occurred. Risk adverse corporate giants either recognize the benefits of having courts side with them in these situations, or they are simply big supporters of educating our judges.
According to a recent investigation by the Center for Public Integrity, "conservative foundations, multinational oil companies and a prescription drug maker were the most frequent sponsors of more than 100 expense-paid educational seminars attended by federal judges over a 4 1/2-year period." About 185 federal judges participated in these "educational" events which were sponsored by multinational corporations such as ExxonMobil, Pfizer and BP.
These seminars are clearly designed to encourage judicial principles that would benefit the sponsors. According to the investigators, Justice Carl A. Barbier happens to have attended at least one of these conferences in 2009, which was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute, Shell Oil Company, and Exxon Mobil Corporation. Barbier has since dismissed a wrongful death case against Exxon and now finds himself presiding over the BP Deepwater Horizon cases. In an ongoing trial, it is up to him to determine whether or not BP is grossly negligent and liable for tens of billions of dollars in Clean Water Act damages.
Sponsoring seminars and conferences are not the only ways that profiteers have found a way to interact with the judiciary. Pennsylvania Judges Mark Ciavarilla Jr. and Michael Conahan are respectively serving 28 year and 18 year prison sentences after being accused of accepting millions of dollars from the private prison industry and subsequently handing out harsh juvenile sentences to fill their cells.
Corporate influence has been growing within our government for many years, along with policies that have upwardly redistributed greater portions of the nation's treasure and resources to the already wealthy. Through judicial ruling, corporations have attained "legal personhood" and the same inherent rights that are endowed upon people. They have used those rights to insert themselves into our electoral and legislative processes, and have found in the judiciary another pathway to ensure their interests are served.
Perhaps the silver lining to the corporate storm cloud, which brought us the economic crash of 2008, is that most Americans have awakened to the fact that our democracy is suffering under the weight of corporate personhood. Many of them are making efforts to reverse the trend. One way people are making a difference is by volunteering with Move to Amend, The Campaign to End Corporate Personhood.
Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap
Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap is national director of Move to Amend and an active member of Extinction Rebellion. She has served as a local elected official, campaign organizer, trainer, facilitator and mediator, and coordinated numerous grassroots and national projects and organizations.
Sabina Khan
Sabina Khan is a Communications Intern with the Move to Amend Coalition. She blogs at Express Tribune and can be reached at sabinak@movetoamend.org.
If you were a corporation and wanted to influence government for your own benefit, choosing to persuade judges is a far easier task (and less expensive) than persuading Congress or the White House. Although, Monsanto recently made headlines when they partnered with Senator Roy Blunt to sneak protections for the GMO industry into a recently passed appropriations act, success like this is hard earned in the legislature. Now Monsanto faces what will be a highly publicized repeal effort.
The ability to persuade Judges has immediate benefits. Say, for instance, that your negligence accidentally results in an oil-rig blowing up, killing several workers onboard, and dumping millions of barrels of crude oil in the Gulf of Mexico. It's much more expedient to have a judge use creative interpretation of existing law to find in your favor during the consequential lawsuits. It would just be awkward to pursue new legislation to save your tail after the incident had already occurred. Risk adverse corporate giants either recognize the benefits of having courts side with them in these situations, or they are simply big supporters of educating our judges.
According to a recent investigation by the Center for Public Integrity, "conservative foundations, multinational oil companies and a prescription drug maker were the most frequent sponsors of more than 100 expense-paid educational seminars attended by federal judges over a 4 1/2-year period." About 185 federal judges participated in these "educational" events which were sponsored by multinational corporations such as ExxonMobil, Pfizer and BP.
These seminars are clearly designed to encourage judicial principles that would benefit the sponsors. According to the investigators, Justice Carl A. Barbier happens to have attended at least one of these conferences in 2009, which was sponsored by the American Petroleum Institute, Shell Oil Company, and Exxon Mobil Corporation. Barbier has since dismissed a wrongful death case against Exxon and now finds himself presiding over the BP Deepwater Horizon cases. In an ongoing trial, it is up to him to determine whether or not BP is grossly negligent and liable for tens of billions of dollars in Clean Water Act damages.
Sponsoring seminars and conferences are not the only ways that profiteers have found a way to interact with the judiciary. Pennsylvania Judges Mark Ciavarilla Jr. and Michael Conahan are respectively serving 28 year and 18 year prison sentences after being accused of accepting millions of dollars from the private prison industry and subsequently handing out harsh juvenile sentences to fill their cells.
Corporate influence has been growing within our government for many years, along with policies that have upwardly redistributed greater portions of the nation's treasure and resources to the already wealthy. Through judicial ruling, corporations have attained "legal personhood" and the same inherent rights that are endowed upon people. They have used those rights to insert themselves into our electoral and legislative processes, and have found in the judiciary another pathway to ensure their interests are served.
Perhaps the silver lining to the corporate storm cloud, which brought us the economic crash of 2008, is that most Americans have awakened to the fact that our democracy is suffering under the weight of corporate personhood. Many of them are making efforts to reverse the trend. One way people are making a difference is by volunteering with Move to Amend, The Campaign to End Corporate Personhood.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.