SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Occupy the Public Forum: 5 Values to Profess Beyond the Protest
While some people are frustrated that the Occupiers haven't issued detailed policy briefs, they managed to do something arguably more important: open a dialog on values that has been held captive by conservative forces for years .
Oct 30, 2011
While some people are frustrated that the Occupiers haven't issued detailed policy briefs, they managed to do something arguably more important: open a dialog on values that has been held captive by conservative forces for years .
Occupy Wall Street and its solidarity tents are injecting a different set of questions and issues into what used to be our public forum. Truth be told, they are injecting a lot of disjointed, broad questions and issues, and that's great. This isn't the time to hone and package outrage into ballot initiatives or candidates. It is a time to put forth core beliefs and principles and demand that they be discussed, vetted and applied in meaningful ways.
I've heard five core values, by no means the whole list. Rather, they are a starting point for a real discussion about what we, as a nation, embrace that can make us vibrant and whole.
Value #1: People are people, and corporations are not. That means, among other things, that a government of the people, by the people and for the people should represent (and be represented by) bi-peds and not corporate conglomerations. At a fundamental level, our economic disaster and the bailouts to date shows who the current court and office holders view as "people" - and it is not us.
Value #2: Fairness. This does not mean equal shares for all, or serious retributions of wealth and land. It does mean valuing what the parable (and investor Warren Buffett) opines: from those who have, more shall be required. And, the less stated corollary, those that don't have substance should at least have a reasonable avenue to a sustainable future rather than a chasm of debt.
Value #3: Responsibility. This value includes both individual responsibility and collective responsibility, so it's a biggie. And it's tricky because we want to believe - as we have been coached, coddled and cajoled to believe by media - that more is better. Individually, we are entitled to more than our ancestors, and collectively, as a nation, we are entitled to more than the rest of the world. Truth is, more is more and not better. Unlimited growth is not possible with a limited earth. Do we really value "more" and "better" above sustainability and a dignified life, particularly if only a small percentage actually experience the more and better? Many young people, but not only them, aren't buying that non-stop production of greenhouse gases or gobbling of resources is a good thing now, and definitely aren't buying that it's a good thing for the next generations. The question is: do we value the future enough to change the present?
Value #4: The Commons exist. Contrary to the values espoused by capitalism and those who benefit from privatizing anything for which there is a demand (e.g. water, land, air), this value asserts that some things belong to all of us and are essential for democracy. Rain that falls in one state does not belong to another's water resource management, aquifers in Cochabamba do not belong to private industries, nor do mountain tops and ecosystems belong to coal companies or the highest bidder.
Value #5: Solidarity matters. This value usually leads immediately to discussion of tactics, movements or event hierarchies of wanted outcomes. Before we go there, let's first acknowledge that connections with one another hold value. As human beings, we have the capacity to recognize both similarities and differences, reach beyond our solitary selves to connect with others. How we connect, how deeply and broadly, how fully matters. What's more, solidarity is a two-way street not to be confused with charity.
Occupy Wall Street and subsequent gatherings give us a chance to hold discussions about core values that have not happened in years. Certainly they haven't happened in political debates. Rarely have they happened in media, or even in what few civic forums remain (e.g. religious gatherings, university halls, library or theater rooms, etc.). Now they are happening in the street - perhaps the most democratic of public forums. That's a good start.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Carol Schachet
Carol Schachet director of development and communications at Grassroots International and a longtime organizer. Her writings have appeared in the Resist Newsletter, Ecology Today, Insights and community journals.
While some people are frustrated that the Occupiers haven't issued detailed policy briefs, they managed to do something arguably more important: open a dialog on values that has been held captive by conservative forces for years .
Occupy Wall Street and its solidarity tents are injecting a different set of questions and issues into what used to be our public forum. Truth be told, they are injecting a lot of disjointed, broad questions and issues, and that's great. This isn't the time to hone and package outrage into ballot initiatives or candidates. It is a time to put forth core beliefs and principles and demand that they be discussed, vetted and applied in meaningful ways.
I've heard five core values, by no means the whole list. Rather, they are a starting point for a real discussion about what we, as a nation, embrace that can make us vibrant and whole.
Value #1: People are people, and corporations are not. That means, among other things, that a government of the people, by the people and for the people should represent (and be represented by) bi-peds and not corporate conglomerations. At a fundamental level, our economic disaster and the bailouts to date shows who the current court and office holders view as "people" - and it is not us.
Value #2: Fairness. This does not mean equal shares for all, or serious retributions of wealth and land. It does mean valuing what the parable (and investor Warren Buffett) opines: from those who have, more shall be required. And, the less stated corollary, those that don't have substance should at least have a reasonable avenue to a sustainable future rather than a chasm of debt.
Value #3: Responsibility. This value includes both individual responsibility and collective responsibility, so it's a biggie. And it's tricky because we want to believe - as we have been coached, coddled and cajoled to believe by media - that more is better. Individually, we are entitled to more than our ancestors, and collectively, as a nation, we are entitled to more than the rest of the world. Truth is, more is more and not better. Unlimited growth is not possible with a limited earth. Do we really value "more" and "better" above sustainability and a dignified life, particularly if only a small percentage actually experience the more and better? Many young people, but not only them, aren't buying that non-stop production of greenhouse gases or gobbling of resources is a good thing now, and definitely aren't buying that it's a good thing for the next generations. The question is: do we value the future enough to change the present?
Value #4: The Commons exist. Contrary to the values espoused by capitalism and those who benefit from privatizing anything for which there is a demand (e.g. water, land, air), this value asserts that some things belong to all of us and are essential for democracy. Rain that falls in one state does not belong to another's water resource management, aquifers in Cochabamba do not belong to private industries, nor do mountain tops and ecosystems belong to coal companies or the highest bidder.
Value #5: Solidarity matters. This value usually leads immediately to discussion of tactics, movements or event hierarchies of wanted outcomes. Before we go there, let's first acknowledge that connections with one another hold value. As human beings, we have the capacity to recognize both similarities and differences, reach beyond our solitary selves to connect with others. How we connect, how deeply and broadly, how fully matters. What's more, solidarity is a two-way street not to be confused with charity.
Occupy Wall Street and subsequent gatherings give us a chance to hold discussions about core values that have not happened in years. Certainly they haven't happened in political debates. Rarely have they happened in media, or even in what few civic forums remain (e.g. religious gatherings, university halls, library or theater rooms, etc.). Now they are happening in the street - perhaps the most democratic of public forums. That's a good start.
Carol Schachet
Carol Schachet director of development and communications at Grassroots International and a longtime organizer. Her writings have appeared in the Resist Newsletter, Ecology Today, Insights and community journals.
While some people are frustrated that the Occupiers haven't issued detailed policy briefs, they managed to do something arguably more important: open a dialog on values that has been held captive by conservative forces for years .
Occupy Wall Street and its solidarity tents are injecting a different set of questions and issues into what used to be our public forum. Truth be told, they are injecting a lot of disjointed, broad questions and issues, and that's great. This isn't the time to hone and package outrage into ballot initiatives or candidates. It is a time to put forth core beliefs and principles and demand that they be discussed, vetted and applied in meaningful ways.
I've heard five core values, by no means the whole list. Rather, they are a starting point for a real discussion about what we, as a nation, embrace that can make us vibrant and whole.
Value #1: People are people, and corporations are not. That means, among other things, that a government of the people, by the people and for the people should represent (and be represented by) bi-peds and not corporate conglomerations. At a fundamental level, our economic disaster and the bailouts to date shows who the current court and office holders view as "people" - and it is not us.
Value #2: Fairness. This does not mean equal shares for all, or serious retributions of wealth and land. It does mean valuing what the parable (and investor Warren Buffett) opines: from those who have, more shall be required. And, the less stated corollary, those that don't have substance should at least have a reasonable avenue to a sustainable future rather than a chasm of debt.
Value #3: Responsibility. This value includes both individual responsibility and collective responsibility, so it's a biggie. And it's tricky because we want to believe - as we have been coached, coddled and cajoled to believe by media - that more is better. Individually, we are entitled to more than our ancestors, and collectively, as a nation, we are entitled to more than the rest of the world. Truth is, more is more and not better. Unlimited growth is not possible with a limited earth. Do we really value "more" and "better" above sustainability and a dignified life, particularly if only a small percentage actually experience the more and better? Many young people, but not only them, aren't buying that non-stop production of greenhouse gases or gobbling of resources is a good thing now, and definitely aren't buying that it's a good thing for the next generations. The question is: do we value the future enough to change the present?
Value #4: The Commons exist. Contrary to the values espoused by capitalism and those who benefit from privatizing anything for which there is a demand (e.g. water, land, air), this value asserts that some things belong to all of us and are essential for democracy. Rain that falls in one state does not belong to another's water resource management, aquifers in Cochabamba do not belong to private industries, nor do mountain tops and ecosystems belong to coal companies or the highest bidder.
Value #5: Solidarity matters. This value usually leads immediately to discussion of tactics, movements or event hierarchies of wanted outcomes. Before we go there, let's first acknowledge that connections with one another hold value. As human beings, we have the capacity to recognize both similarities and differences, reach beyond our solitary selves to connect with others. How we connect, how deeply and broadly, how fully matters. What's more, solidarity is a two-way street not to be confused with charity.
Occupy Wall Street and subsequent gatherings give us a chance to hold discussions about core values that have not happened in years. Certainly they haven't happened in political debates. Rarely have they happened in media, or even in what few civic forums remain (e.g. religious gatherings, university halls, library or theater rooms, etc.). Now they are happening in the street - perhaps the most democratic of public forums. That's a good start.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.