SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Tar Sands Chance for Revitalized Climate Movement at 11th Hour?
Setting Aside Differences, Seizing the Moral High Ground
Aug 19, 2011
Momentum is now decidedly building for what might well become a breakthrough moment in the climate movement. This movement - attempting to address the transcendent issue which now threatens the very survival of civilization - has been hampered by a disempowering case of disunity. From the very beginning, there has been a divide between those seeking to affect the necessary change from within the system and those who held the belief that the process itself had already become corrupted through the inappropriate influence of the vested interests opposing any change.
There was an effort to move legislation through Congress, the main bills "in play" channeled by Waxman-Markey in the House and Kerry in the Senate. On this side were Al Gore and his Alliance for Climate Protection as well as the established groups such as the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense Fund. Grassroots activists watched these bills essentially neutered as the fossil fuel lobby made its power play. They warned that the stakes were far too high to allow the climate issue to become a political football. They argued that the autonomous laws of physics pushing the disruption to a tipping point cannot be delayed to accomodate the "horse-trading" that occurs within the Beltway.
Wherever one might have stood on this question, it is unarguable that the verdict is in. Any hope of Congress being able to enact a meaningful climate bill has utterly collapsed. Not only has the specific legislation been abandoned, but also the issue itself. Currently, a serious plan to rein in greenhouse gases is not even on the agenda.
Given such paralysis, the path to such control must be found elsewhere. Enter the issue of a proposed pipeline to carry massive amounts of tar sands crude oil from Canada into the U.S. This decision is not in the hands of Congress. As the pipeline would cross an international border, the decision is entirely up to Obama as president. As what is shaping up to be the largest scale civil disobedience on climate in U.S. history gains momentum (over 2000 people already signed up), a truly unique opportunity has emerged to place past differences aside and seize the moment to create the kind of empowered movement so totally necessary to prevent catastrophe.
There is nothing to gain at this time from any argument about which approach was correct. Facing a dead end in Congress, the avenue by which progress can be made on climate has become the office of the president. Stopping the pipeline has become the ideal issue on which to appeal to Obama.
This is a winnable issue. But any chance of victory will be 100% dependent on bringing all forces to bear to place maximum moral pressure on Obama. Grassroots groups (including indigenous) are using primarily volunteer energy to nonviolently place bodies on the line in front of the White House. With limited financial resources, they are still pushing mightily to get the word out.
There is, however, a critically important role that could be played by the larger, more well-funded "big green" groups. Even if there are organizational constraints that prevent them from formally endorsing a civil disobedience, there are all kinds of ways they can be supportive short of that. Without issuing an official "approval", email alerts could be sent to their massive lists to at least inform their members about the actions and provide links which could allow them to make their own decisions as to whether to participate. There are also other ways they could help.
We already know what tremendous pressure will be placed on Obama by the limitless wealth of the fossil fuel interests. The only hope our side has is to generate the kind of "people power" that can counteract this. The time has come for all who recognize our obligation to future generations to be willing to come together in common purpose. May all of us - the grassroots folks and the large organizations - open our hearts to the striking words of Terry Tempest Williams, "The Eyes of the Future are looking back at us and they are praying for us to see beyond our own time."
For more information on the historic tar sands actions, which will extend from Aug. 20 to Sept. 3: www.tarsandsaction.org
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Gary Houser
Gary Houser helped organize one of the first major climate civil disobedience actions in the U.S. in 2009, which contributed impetus toward the Keystone pipeline campaign. For ten years he has worked for a green transition in Ohio, and now produces video resources--an example being one used to recruit people for the climate summit in Scotland. Email: climatecollapsefilmproject [at] gmail [dot] com
Momentum is now decidedly building for what might well become a breakthrough moment in the climate movement. This movement - attempting to address the transcendent issue which now threatens the very survival of civilization - has been hampered by a disempowering case of disunity. From the very beginning, there has been a divide between those seeking to affect the necessary change from within the system and those who held the belief that the process itself had already become corrupted through the inappropriate influence of the vested interests opposing any change.
There was an effort to move legislation through Congress, the main bills "in play" channeled by Waxman-Markey in the House and Kerry in the Senate. On this side were Al Gore and his Alliance for Climate Protection as well as the established groups such as the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense Fund. Grassroots activists watched these bills essentially neutered as the fossil fuel lobby made its power play. They warned that the stakes were far too high to allow the climate issue to become a political football. They argued that the autonomous laws of physics pushing the disruption to a tipping point cannot be delayed to accomodate the "horse-trading" that occurs within the Beltway.
Wherever one might have stood on this question, it is unarguable that the verdict is in. Any hope of Congress being able to enact a meaningful climate bill has utterly collapsed. Not only has the specific legislation been abandoned, but also the issue itself. Currently, a serious plan to rein in greenhouse gases is not even on the agenda.
Given such paralysis, the path to such control must be found elsewhere. Enter the issue of a proposed pipeline to carry massive amounts of tar sands crude oil from Canada into the U.S. This decision is not in the hands of Congress. As the pipeline would cross an international border, the decision is entirely up to Obama as president. As what is shaping up to be the largest scale civil disobedience on climate in U.S. history gains momentum (over 2000 people already signed up), a truly unique opportunity has emerged to place past differences aside and seize the moment to create the kind of empowered movement so totally necessary to prevent catastrophe.
There is nothing to gain at this time from any argument about which approach was correct. Facing a dead end in Congress, the avenue by which progress can be made on climate has become the office of the president. Stopping the pipeline has become the ideal issue on which to appeal to Obama.
This is a winnable issue. But any chance of victory will be 100% dependent on bringing all forces to bear to place maximum moral pressure on Obama. Grassroots groups (including indigenous) are using primarily volunteer energy to nonviolently place bodies on the line in front of the White House. With limited financial resources, they are still pushing mightily to get the word out.
There is, however, a critically important role that could be played by the larger, more well-funded "big green" groups. Even if there are organizational constraints that prevent them from formally endorsing a civil disobedience, there are all kinds of ways they can be supportive short of that. Without issuing an official "approval", email alerts could be sent to their massive lists to at least inform their members about the actions and provide links which could allow them to make their own decisions as to whether to participate. There are also other ways they could help.
We already know what tremendous pressure will be placed on Obama by the limitless wealth of the fossil fuel interests. The only hope our side has is to generate the kind of "people power" that can counteract this. The time has come for all who recognize our obligation to future generations to be willing to come together in common purpose. May all of us - the grassroots folks and the large organizations - open our hearts to the striking words of Terry Tempest Williams, "The Eyes of the Future are looking back at us and they are praying for us to see beyond our own time."
For more information on the historic tar sands actions, which will extend from Aug. 20 to Sept. 3: www.tarsandsaction.org
Gary Houser
Gary Houser helped organize one of the first major climate civil disobedience actions in the U.S. in 2009, which contributed impetus toward the Keystone pipeline campaign. For ten years he has worked for a green transition in Ohio, and now produces video resources--an example being one used to recruit people for the climate summit in Scotland. Email: climatecollapsefilmproject [at] gmail [dot] com
Momentum is now decidedly building for what might well become a breakthrough moment in the climate movement. This movement - attempting to address the transcendent issue which now threatens the very survival of civilization - has been hampered by a disempowering case of disunity. From the very beginning, there has been a divide between those seeking to affect the necessary change from within the system and those who held the belief that the process itself had already become corrupted through the inappropriate influence of the vested interests opposing any change.
There was an effort to move legislation through Congress, the main bills "in play" channeled by Waxman-Markey in the House and Kerry in the Senate. On this side were Al Gore and his Alliance for Climate Protection as well as the established groups such as the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Environmental Defense Fund. Grassroots activists watched these bills essentially neutered as the fossil fuel lobby made its power play. They warned that the stakes were far too high to allow the climate issue to become a political football. They argued that the autonomous laws of physics pushing the disruption to a tipping point cannot be delayed to accomodate the "horse-trading" that occurs within the Beltway.
Wherever one might have stood on this question, it is unarguable that the verdict is in. Any hope of Congress being able to enact a meaningful climate bill has utterly collapsed. Not only has the specific legislation been abandoned, but also the issue itself. Currently, a serious plan to rein in greenhouse gases is not even on the agenda.
Given such paralysis, the path to such control must be found elsewhere. Enter the issue of a proposed pipeline to carry massive amounts of tar sands crude oil from Canada into the U.S. This decision is not in the hands of Congress. As the pipeline would cross an international border, the decision is entirely up to Obama as president. As what is shaping up to be the largest scale civil disobedience on climate in U.S. history gains momentum (over 2000 people already signed up), a truly unique opportunity has emerged to place past differences aside and seize the moment to create the kind of empowered movement so totally necessary to prevent catastrophe.
There is nothing to gain at this time from any argument about which approach was correct. Facing a dead end in Congress, the avenue by which progress can be made on climate has become the office of the president. Stopping the pipeline has become the ideal issue on which to appeal to Obama.
This is a winnable issue. But any chance of victory will be 100% dependent on bringing all forces to bear to place maximum moral pressure on Obama. Grassroots groups (including indigenous) are using primarily volunteer energy to nonviolently place bodies on the line in front of the White House. With limited financial resources, they are still pushing mightily to get the word out.
There is, however, a critically important role that could be played by the larger, more well-funded "big green" groups. Even if there are organizational constraints that prevent them from formally endorsing a civil disobedience, there are all kinds of ways they can be supportive short of that. Without issuing an official "approval", email alerts could be sent to their massive lists to at least inform their members about the actions and provide links which could allow them to make their own decisions as to whether to participate. There are also other ways they could help.
We already know what tremendous pressure will be placed on Obama by the limitless wealth of the fossil fuel interests. The only hope our side has is to generate the kind of "people power" that can counteract this. The time has come for all who recognize our obligation to future generations to be willing to come together in common purpose. May all of us - the grassroots folks and the large organizations - open our hearts to the striking words of Terry Tempest Williams, "The Eyes of the Future are looking back at us and they are praying for us to see beyond our own time."
For more information on the historic tar sands actions, which will extend from Aug. 20 to Sept. 3: www.tarsandsaction.org
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.