

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad does not serve as a Democrat.
He serves as a Democrat-Non-Partisan League senator.
That's a recognition of the fact that the North Dakota Democratic Party and the old Non-Partisan League, a radical grouping that challenged corporate interests and the wealthy elites (with a state-owned bank, publicly run grain elevators and progressive taxation), merged in 1956.
North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad does not serve as a Democrat.
He serves as a Democrat-Non-Partisan League senator.
That's a recognition of the fact that the North Dakota Democratic Party and the old Non-Partisan League, a radical grouping that challenged corporate interests and the wealthy elites (with a state-owned bank, publicly run grain elevators and progressive taxation), merged in 1956.
Conrad, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, showed a little of his NPL side when he floated the very good idea of using a surtax on millionaires as a way to bring down budget deficits.
Few scholars of North Dakota politics would confuse the senator with the NPL activists of old. Conrad's actually a budget hawk. But he reached into the NPL cabinet and found a good idea for balancing budgets and addressing deficits: taxing the rich.
Conrad reportedly considered a 3 percent surtax on the wealthy as part of an effort to gain the support of Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, who serves on the committee and has argued that at least half of any deficit-reduction plan must be paid for with new revenue--as opposed to deep cuts to needed domestic programs.
Unfortunately, Conrad's idea did not get very far with his fellow Democrats--let alone the crash-and-burn Republicans of the current Senate.
Nor was it particularly popular at the White House, where President Obama recently met, according to published reports, with "potential backers from Wall Street banks..."
So it was that the Washington-insider newspaper The Hill featured a headline late Friday that announced: "Senate Dems drop surtax on millionaires from draft budget."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad does not serve as a Democrat.
He serves as a Democrat-Non-Partisan League senator.
That's a recognition of the fact that the North Dakota Democratic Party and the old Non-Partisan League, a radical grouping that challenged corporate interests and the wealthy elites (with a state-owned bank, publicly run grain elevators and progressive taxation), merged in 1956.
Conrad, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, showed a little of his NPL side when he floated the very good idea of using a surtax on millionaires as a way to bring down budget deficits.
Few scholars of North Dakota politics would confuse the senator with the NPL activists of old. Conrad's actually a budget hawk. But he reached into the NPL cabinet and found a good idea for balancing budgets and addressing deficits: taxing the rich.
Conrad reportedly considered a 3 percent surtax on the wealthy as part of an effort to gain the support of Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, who serves on the committee and has argued that at least half of any deficit-reduction plan must be paid for with new revenue--as opposed to deep cuts to needed domestic programs.
Unfortunately, Conrad's idea did not get very far with his fellow Democrats--let alone the crash-and-burn Republicans of the current Senate.
Nor was it particularly popular at the White House, where President Obama recently met, according to published reports, with "potential backers from Wall Street banks..."
So it was that the Washington-insider newspaper The Hill featured a headline late Friday that announced: "Senate Dems drop surtax on millionaires from draft budget."
North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad does not serve as a Democrat.
He serves as a Democrat-Non-Partisan League senator.
That's a recognition of the fact that the North Dakota Democratic Party and the old Non-Partisan League, a radical grouping that challenged corporate interests and the wealthy elites (with a state-owned bank, publicly run grain elevators and progressive taxation), merged in 1956.
Conrad, the chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, showed a little of his NPL side when he floated the very good idea of using a surtax on millionaires as a way to bring down budget deficits.
Few scholars of North Dakota politics would confuse the senator with the NPL activists of old. Conrad's actually a budget hawk. But he reached into the NPL cabinet and found a good idea for balancing budgets and addressing deficits: taxing the rich.
Conrad reportedly considered a 3 percent surtax on the wealthy as part of an effort to gain the support of Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, who serves on the committee and has argued that at least half of any deficit-reduction plan must be paid for with new revenue--as opposed to deep cuts to needed domestic programs.
Unfortunately, Conrad's idea did not get very far with his fellow Democrats--let alone the crash-and-burn Republicans of the current Senate.
Nor was it particularly popular at the White House, where President Obama recently met, according to published reports, with "potential backers from Wall Street banks..."
So it was that the Washington-insider newspaper The Hill featured a headline late Friday that announced: "Senate Dems drop surtax on millionaires from draft budget."