SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
AT&T Wants to Give You an 80s Makeover
If you were around in the 80s, you might be experiencing a horrible flashback right about now.
No, it's not because legwarmers and spandex are in style again. It's because AT&T, that monopoly that once lorded over your rotary phone, has resurfaced with a scheme to rule your mobile phone as well.
Back in the 80s, AT&T's power was near absolute. That's why antitrust authorities stepped in to break up the monopoly and protect the American people against abuse.
May 28, 2011
If you were around in the 80s, you might be experiencing a horrible flashback right about now.
No, it's not because legwarmers and spandex are in style again. It's because AT&T, that monopoly that once lorded over your rotary phone, has resurfaced with a scheme to rule your mobile phone as well.
Back in the 80s, AT&T's power was near absolute. That's why antitrust authorities stepped in to break up the monopoly and protect the American people against abuse.
Now, with AT&T's planned $39 billion takeover of T-Mobile, we're reaching the danger point again. And this time control over one of the most vital forms of communication is at stake.
If regulators allow AT&T's takeover of T-Mobile, we would be left with a wireless market that is far more consolidated than the markets for oil, banking, automobiles and air travel.
What does that mean? To achieve comparable consolidation in the oil industry, ExxonMobil would have to merge with BP, Shell, Chevron-Texaco and Citgo. And to make the comparison even more acute, these oil giants would not only merge under ExxonMobil, but you would be required to buy only ExxonMobil gas for the next two years, or pay a steep termination fee.
It means that a service that is becoming as critical to Americans as affordable, reliable water and electricity will be under the thumb of two companies that place their narrow profit incentive above the interests of everyone else.
The problems with this mega-merger are glaring and obvious enough. The real issue is whether Washington regulators are going to muster the courage to speak out and stop it.
If the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice decide to rubber-stamp this deal, you'll likely end up paying more to have AT&T drop your calls; and access to popular applications like Skype, Slingbox and Google Earth will be limited even further ... if AT&T lets you use them at all.
Thousands of mobile phone users have already flooded the FCC with comments since news of AT&T's mega-merger became public. (The deadline for public comments is next Tuesday, May 31.)
Fortunately, some in Washington are catching on. Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday said that such mergers "always eliminate more jobs than they create. There is every likelihood that the proposed acquisition of T-Mobile by AT&T could lead to both higher prices and decreased consumer choices." (Rep. Conyers' committee is convening a hearing on the issue later today.)
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) who sits on the House Commerce Committee recently said the merger be a "historic mistake."
They understand what the Justice Department knew in 1984, when it broke up the old Ma Bell: AT&T has gotten too big.
We can't go back to the bad old days of legwarmers and AT&T. Washington must do its job and stop this merger.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Tim Karr
Tim Karr is a senior director at Free Press, the U.S.-based organization that advocates for more just and democratic media.
If you were around in the 80s, you might be experiencing a horrible flashback right about now.
No, it's not because legwarmers and spandex are in style again. It's because AT&T, that monopoly that once lorded over your rotary phone, has resurfaced with a scheme to rule your mobile phone as well.
Back in the 80s, AT&T's power was near absolute. That's why antitrust authorities stepped in to break up the monopoly and protect the American people against abuse.
Now, with AT&T's planned $39 billion takeover of T-Mobile, we're reaching the danger point again. And this time control over one of the most vital forms of communication is at stake.
If regulators allow AT&T's takeover of T-Mobile, we would be left with a wireless market that is far more consolidated than the markets for oil, banking, automobiles and air travel.
What does that mean? To achieve comparable consolidation in the oil industry, ExxonMobil would have to merge with BP, Shell, Chevron-Texaco and Citgo. And to make the comparison even more acute, these oil giants would not only merge under ExxonMobil, but you would be required to buy only ExxonMobil gas for the next two years, or pay a steep termination fee.
It means that a service that is becoming as critical to Americans as affordable, reliable water and electricity will be under the thumb of two companies that place their narrow profit incentive above the interests of everyone else.
The problems with this mega-merger are glaring and obvious enough. The real issue is whether Washington regulators are going to muster the courage to speak out and stop it.
If the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice decide to rubber-stamp this deal, you'll likely end up paying more to have AT&T drop your calls; and access to popular applications like Skype, Slingbox and Google Earth will be limited even further ... if AT&T lets you use them at all.
Thousands of mobile phone users have already flooded the FCC with comments since news of AT&T's mega-merger became public. (The deadline for public comments is next Tuesday, May 31.)
Fortunately, some in Washington are catching on. Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday said that such mergers "always eliminate more jobs than they create. There is every likelihood that the proposed acquisition of T-Mobile by AT&T could lead to both higher prices and decreased consumer choices." (Rep. Conyers' committee is convening a hearing on the issue later today.)
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) who sits on the House Commerce Committee recently said the merger be a "historic mistake."
They understand what the Justice Department knew in 1984, when it broke up the old Ma Bell: AT&T has gotten too big.
We can't go back to the bad old days of legwarmers and AT&T. Washington must do its job and stop this merger.
Tim Karr
Tim Karr is a senior director at Free Press, the U.S.-based organization that advocates for more just and democratic media.
If you were around in the 80s, you might be experiencing a horrible flashback right about now.
No, it's not because legwarmers and spandex are in style again. It's because AT&T, that monopoly that once lorded over your rotary phone, has resurfaced with a scheme to rule your mobile phone as well.
Back in the 80s, AT&T's power was near absolute. That's why antitrust authorities stepped in to break up the monopoly and protect the American people against abuse.
Now, with AT&T's planned $39 billion takeover of T-Mobile, we're reaching the danger point again. And this time control over one of the most vital forms of communication is at stake.
If regulators allow AT&T's takeover of T-Mobile, we would be left with a wireless market that is far more consolidated than the markets for oil, banking, automobiles and air travel.
What does that mean? To achieve comparable consolidation in the oil industry, ExxonMobil would have to merge with BP, Shell, Chevron-Texaco and Citgo. And to make the comparison even more acute, these oil giants would not only merge under ExxonMobil, but you would be required to buy only ExxonMobil gas for the next two years, or pay a steep termination fee.
It means that a service that is becoming as critical to Americans as affordable, reliable water and electricity will be under the thumb of two companies that place their narrow profit incentive above the interests of everyone else.
The problems with this mega-merger are glaring and obvious enough. The real issue is whether Washington regulators are going to muster the courage to speak out and stop it.
If the Federal Communications Commission and Department of Justice decide to rubber-stamp this deal, you'll likely end up paying more to have AT&T drop your calls; and access to popular applications like Skype, Slingbox and Google Earth will be limited even further ... if AT&T lets you use them at all.
Thousands of mobile phone users have already flooded the FCC with comments since news of AT&T's mega-merger became public. (The deadline for public comments is next Tuesday, May 31.)
Fortunately, some in Washington are catching on. Rep. John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, on Wednesday said that such mergers "always eliminate more jobs than they create. There is every likelihood that the proposed acquisition of T-Mobile by AT&T could lead to both higher prices and decreased consumer choices." (Rep. Conyers' committee is convening a hearing on the issue later today.)
Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) who sits on the House Commerce Committee recently said the merger be a "historic mistake."
They understand what the Justice Department knew in 1984, when it broke up the old Ma Bell: AT&T has gotten too big.
We can't go back to the bad old days of legwarmers and AT&T. Washington must do its job and stop this merger.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.