SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The 'Greenest Olympics' Actually an Environmental Catastrophe
Feb 03, 2011
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Grist.org
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.