SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The 'Greenest Olympics' Actually an Environmental Catastrophe
Feb 03, 2011
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Grist.org
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
Like a downhill skier that crashes right out of the gate, the Sochi
2014 Organizing Committee has a lot of catching up to do if it wants to
earn a gold medal for "the greenest Olympics." World Wildlife Fund
Russia and Greenpeace Russia resigned from the Games' advisory committee
last year and recently boycotted a visit of U.N. Environment Program
officials who were to inspect the progress, saying, "We do not want to be part of a green PR for the Olympic projects."
What are these NGOs so upset about? Well, dumping, logging,
pipelines, and a lack of transparency, to name a few. The main watchdog,
Environmental Watch on North Caucasus (EWNC), sends weekly email updates with headlines like these:
- South Stream pipeline to cut through five protected areas
- Russian Railways destroyed clear mountain river in the national park with construction
waste - Illegal Olympic waste dump threatens Sochi's national park
- The Sochi national park will be cut for the Sochi 2014 Olympics
- Olympic gas pipeline spill is continuing in Sochi National Park
The impacts on the treasured Mzymta River and its valley, plus the
cutting of thousands of hectares of protected forests -- whose trees
include at least two Red List tree species -- have these activists
hopping mad. Suren Gazaryan of EWNC confirmed this cutting to me by
email, saying "It is clear that coastal lands with relict pine forests
will be developed first. Two species of pine, which are main
constituents of these forests, are protected under the Russian
Forest Code and the Red List."
Every Olympics has its burden of impacts
and truly, every one is a minor catastrophe. Is Sochi so much worse?
The impacts to date seem to indicate that it could be. And worse, news
that organizers are planning a million dollar PR center for the Olympics
using funds budgeted for
environmental protection suggests a greenwash.
Perhaps Sochi's biggest challenge will come from the heavens: It's
another temperate maritime city like Vancouver -- where snow had to be
trucked and airlifted in for the ski events in 2010 -- and adequate snow
cover will be a challenge. As a climate scientist said last year,
"I rolled my eyes when they picked a city on the Black Sea," said Simon
Donner. "I'm pretty certain it never snows in the city. They grow palm
trees there."
Who knows how much warmer the temperatures could be for Sochi 2014,
thanks to humanity's continual carbon-loading of the atmosphere over the
next three years?
Concerns about green ski runs aside, the International Olympic
Committee and U.N. Environment Program officials need to begin taking
seriously the bigger on-the-ground impacts being documented by EWNC.
Never mind 2014, the world is already watching.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.