SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Serious Guns and White Terrorism: Two Unasked Questions in Tucson Mass Murder
Jan 10, 2011
Question: How does a mentally unstable man who was kicked out of school and had
run-ins with the law buy such a serious weapon?
The weapon reportedly used in the mass murders in Tucson was a serious weapon -
a Glock 19, semi-automatic pistol, with an extended magazine. Some weapons like
that were illegal to sell in the US from 1994 to 2004 under the Federal Assault
Weapons Ban. It is now legal to sell and own them. The National Rifle
Association reports there are tens of millions of assault weapons in private
hands in the US.
The federal background check for people purchasing such weapons only prohibits
selling such weapons to people who have been legally determined to be mentally
defective or found insane or convicted of crimes. This man had not been found
legally mentally defective or convicted so he was legally entitled to purchase
an assault weapon. In Arizona he was legally entitled to carry the weapon in a
concealed manner.
The US has well over 250 million guns in private hands according to the National
Rifle Association. That is more, according to the BBC, than any country in the
world. In one year, guns murdered 17 people in Finland, 35 in Australia, 39 in
England and Wales, 60 in Spain, 194 in Germany, 200 in Canada, and 9,484 in the
United States according to the Brady Campaign.
Does the US really need tens of millions of assault weapons and hundreds of
millions of other guns? We already put more of our people in prison than any
country in the world and we spend more on our military than all the rest of the
world together. How fearful must we be?
Question: Why is there so little talk of terrorism?
Apparently when a mentally unstable white male is accused, terrorism is not the
first thing that comes to mind. White terrorism is not a concept the US takes
seriously.
When Clay Duke, a white male, threatened Florida school board members with a gun
and shot at them before shooting himself, in December 2010, he was mentally
imbalanced.
When Michael Enright, a white male, was arrested for slashing the throat of a
Muslim NYC cab driver in August of 2010, his friends said he had a drinking
problem.
When Byron Williams, a white male, was arrested after opening fire on police
officers and admitted he was on his way to kill people at offices of a liberal
foundation and a civil liberties organization, in July 2010, he was an
unemployed right wing felon with a drinking problem.
When Joe Stack, a white male, flew his private plane into a federal building in
Austin, Texas, in February 2010, he was angry with the IRS.
When a white male is accused of mass murder, white terrorism is not much talked
of. Rather the mass murder becomes a terrible tragedy but not one where race or
ethnicity or religion need be examined.
Now, if the accused had been Muslim, does anyone doubt whether this mass murder
would have been considered an act of terrorism? US Muslims could have expected
increased surveillance and harassment at home and the places where they work and
worship. They could have expected a Congressional inquiry into the
radicalization of their people. Oh, Representative Peter King (R-NY) has
already started that one!
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Bill Quigley
Bill Quigley is Associate Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. He is a Katrina survivor and has been active in human rights in Haiti for years. He volunteers with the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) and the Bureau de Avocats Internationaux (BAI) in Port au Prince.
Question: How does a mentally unstable man who was kicked out of school and had
run-ins with the law buy such a serious weapon?
The weapon reportedly used in the mass murders in Tucson was a serious weapon -
a Glock 19, semi-automatic pistol, with an extended magazine. Some weapons like
that were illegal to sell in the US from 1994 to 2004 under the Federal Assault
Weapons Ban. It is now legal to sell and own them. The National Rifle
Association reports there are tens of millions of assault weapons in private
hands in the US.
The federal background check for people purchasing such weapons only prohibits
selling such weapons to people who have been legally determined to be mentally
defective or found insane or convicted of crimes. This man had not been found
legally mentally defective or convicted so he was legally entitled to purchase
an assault weapon. In Arizona he was legally entitled to carry the weapon in a
concealed manner.
The US has well over 250 million guns in private hands according to the National
Rifle Association. That is more, according to the BBC, than any country in the
world. In one year, guns murdered 17 people in Finland, 35 in Australia, 39 in
England and Wales, 60 in Spain, 194 in Germany, 200 in Canada, and 9,484 in the
United States according to the Brady Campaign.
Does the US really need tens of millions of assault weapons and hundreds of
millions of other guns? We already put more of our people in prison than any
country in the world and we spend more on our military than all the rest of the
world together. How fearful must we be?
Question: Why is there so little talk of terrorism?
Apparently when a mentally unstable white male is accused, terrorism is not the
first thing that comes to mind. White terrorism is not a concept the US takes
seriously.
When Clay Duke, a white male, threatened Florida school board members with a gun
and shot at them before shooting himself, in December 2010, he was mentally
imbalanced.
When Michael Enright, a white male, was arrested for slashing the throat of a
Muslim NYC cab driver in August of 2010, his friends said he had a drinking
problem.
When Byron Williams, a white male, was arrested after opening fire on police
officers and admitted he was on his way to kill people at offices of a liberal
foundation and a civil liberties organization, in July 2010, he was an
unemployed right wing felon with a drinking problem.
When Joe Stack, a white male, flew his private plane into a federal building in
Austin, Texas, in February 2010, he was angry with the IRS.
When a white male is accused of mass murder, white terrorism is not much talked
of. Rather the mass murder becomes a terrible tragedy but not one where race or
ethnicity or religion need be examined.
Now, if the accused had been Muslim, does anyone doubt whether this mass murder
would have been considered an act of terrorism? US Muslims could have expected
increased surveillance and harassment at home and the places where they work and
worship. They could have expected a Congressional inquiry into the
radicalization of their people. Oh, Representative Peter King (R-NY) has
already started that one!
Bill Quigley
Bill Quigley is Associate Director of the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. He is a Katrina survivor and has been active in human rights in Haiti for years. He volunteers with the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti (IJDH) and the Bureau de Avocats Internationaux (BAI) in Port au Prince.
Question: How does a mentally unstable man who was kicked out of school and had
run-ins with the law buy such a serious weapon?
The weapon reportedly used in the mass murders in Tucson was a serious weapon -
a Glock 19, semi-automatic pistol, with an extended magazine. Some weapons like
that were illegal to sell in the US from 1994 to 2004 under the Federal Assault
Weapons Ban. It is now legal to sell and own them. The National Rifle
Association reports there are tens of millions of assault weapons in private
hands in the US.
The federal background check for people purchasing such weapons only prohibits
selling such weapons to people who have been legally determined to be mentally
defective or found insane or convicted of crimes. This man had not been found
legally mentally defective or convicted so he was legally entitled to purchase
an assault weapon. In Arizona he was legally entitled to carry the weapon in a
concealed manner.
The US has well over 250 million guns in private hands according to the National
Rifle Association. That is more, according to the BBC, than any country in the
world. In one year, guns murdered 17 people in Finland, 35 in Australia, 39 in
England and Wales, 60 in Spain, 194 in Germany, 200 in Canada, and 9,484 in the
United States according to the Brady Campaign.
Does the US really need tens of millions of assault weapons and hundreds of
millions of other guns? We already put more of our people in prison than any
country in the world and we spend more on our military than all the rest of the
world together. How fearful must we be?
Question: Why is there so little talk of terrorism?
Apparently when a mentally unstable white male is accused, terrorism is not the
first thing that comes to mind. White terrorism is not a concept the US takes
seriously.
When Clay Duke, a white male, threatened Florida school board members with a gun
and shot at them before shooting himself, in December 2010, he was mentally
imbalanced.
When Michael Enright, a white male, was arrested for slashing the throat of a
Muslim NYC cab driver in August of 2010, his friends said he had a drinking
problem.
When Byron Williams, a white male, was arrested after opening fire on police
officers and admitted he was on his way to kill people at offices of a liberal
foundation and a civil liberties organization, in July 2010, he was an
unemployed right wing felon with a drinking problem.
When Joe Stack, a white male, flew his private plane into a federal building in
Austin, Texas, in February 2010, he was angry with the IRS.
When a white male is accused of mass murder, white terrorism is not much talked
of. Rather the mass murder becomes a terrible tragedy but not one where race or
ethnicity or religion need be examined.
Now, if the accused had been Muslim, does anyone doubt whether this mass murder
would have been considered an act of terrorism? US Muslims could have expected
increased surveillance and harassment at home and the places where they work and
worship. They could have expected a Congressional inquiry into the
radicalization of their people. Oh, Representative Peter King (R-NY) has
already started that one!
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.