Serious Guns and White Terrorism: Two Unasked Questions in Tucson Mass Murder

Question: How does a mentally unstable man who was kicked out of school and had
run-ins with the law buy such a serious weapon?

The weapon reportedly used in the mass murders in Tucson was a serious weapon -
a Glock 19, semi-automatic pistol, with an extended magazine. Some weapons like
that were illegal to sell in the US from 1994 to 2004 under the Federal Assault
Weapons Ban. It is now legal to sell and own them. The National Rifle
Association reports there are tens of millions of assault weapons in private
hands in the US.

The federal background check for people purchasing such weapons only prohibits
selling such weapons to people who have been legally determined to be mentally
defective or found insane or convicted of crimes. This man had not been found
legally mentally defective or convicted so he was legally entitled to purchase
an assault weapon. In Arizona he was legally entitled to carry the weapon in a
concealed manner.

The US has well over 250 million guns in private hands according to the National
Rifle Association. That is more, according to the BBC, than any country in the
world. In one year, guns murdered 17 people in Finland, 35 in Australia, 39 in
England and Wales, 60 in Spain, 194 in Germany, 200 in Canada, and 9,484 in the
United States according to the Brady Campaign.

Does the US really need tens of millions of assault weapons and hundreds of
millions of other guns? We already put more of our people in prison than any
country in the world and we spend more on our military than all the rest of the
world together. How fearful must we be?

Question: Why is there so little talk of terrorism?

Apparently when a mentally unstable white male is accused, terrorism is not the
first thing that comes to mind. White terrorism is not a concept the US takes
seriously.

When Clay Duke, a white male, threatened Florida school board members with a gun
and shot at them before shooting himself, in December 2010, he was mentally
imbalanced.

When Michael Enright, a white male, was arrested for slashing the throat of a
Muslim NYC cab driver in August of 2010, his friends said he had a drinking
problem.

When Byron Williams, a white male, was arrested after opening fire on police
officers and admitted he was on his way to kill people at offices of a liberal
foundation and a civil liberties organization, in July 2010, he was an
unemployed right wing felon with a drinking problem.

When Joe Stack, a white male, flew his private plane into a federal building in
Austin, Texas, in February 2010, he was angry with the IRS.

When a white male is accused of mass murder, white terrorism is not much talked
of. Rather the mass murder becomes a terrible tragedy but not one where race or
ethnicity or religion need be examined.

Now, if the accused had been Muslim, does anyone doubt whether this mass murder
would have been considered an act of terrorism? US Muslims could have expected
increased surveillance and harassment at home and the places where they work and
worship. They could have expected a Congressional inquiry into the
radicalization of their people. Oh, Representative Peter King (R-NY) has
already started that one!

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.