SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof complained a
while back that he was still "waiting for Gandhi" in Palestine. I complained, in turn, that it was hypocritical for Kristof to
bewail, and perpetuate the stereotype of, the "violent" Palestinians.
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof complained a
while back that he was still "waiting for Gandhi" in Palestine. I complained, in turn, that it was hypocritical for Kristof to
bewail, and perpetuate the stereotype of, the "violent" Palestinians. Instead he
should stay home and call for a new Gandhi here in the U.S., which perpetuates Middle East violence by
so consistently supporting Israel, despite its abuses. Latest example: The feeble statement from the State Department that the U.S. is
"disappointed" to see the Israelis resume settlement expansion.
But if Kristof and others need to travel
abroad in search of a new Gandhi, it's worth asking why they go to Palestine and not to Israel. After
all, Palestinian violence against Israel has virtually ceased. It's the
Israelis who now inflict nearly all the violence. Shouldn't we be looking for the Israeli
Gandhi?
The search might not take as long as you think. There are
plenty of Israeli Jews nonviolently resisting their own government's policies of
occupation and oppression. The latest to find the public spotlight is Rami
Elhanan, a former Israeli soldier who joined other Jewish activists from
Israel and around the world as
sailors for peace and justice on a boat called the Irene. They were headed for
Gaza -- bringing
medical equipment, fishing nets, textbooks, toys, prosthetic limbs, and other
humanitarian supplies, aiming to break the Israeli blockade that deprives the
Gazans of such desperately needed materials -- when the Israeli military seized
them on the high seas.
Rami Elhanan said that he was on the Irene because it was his "moral duty"
to act in support of Palestinians in Gaza, because reconciliation is the surest path
to peace. That note of duty is certainly a Gandhian touch. But what qualifies
him even more as the Israeli Jewish Gandhi is another comment he made to a
reporter: "Those 1.5 million people
in Gaza are
victims exactly as I am."
That comes close to the heart of Gandhian nonviolence.
It's far more than just resisting the impulse to strike out at your enemy. It's
the realization that, as Gandhi put it, "for one who follows the doctrine of
ahimsa [nonviolence], there is no room for an enemy; he denies the existence of
an enemy." And it's the willingness to put your life on the line for the truth
that we have no enemies, because we are all equally participants in, and victims
of, the same system of violence.
Rami Elhanan did not learn that lesson from studying
Gandhi. He learned it from the cruelest experience imaginable: seeing his 14-year-old daughter Smadar
killed in a suicide bombing in 1997. At first, he says, he had the natural reaction: "I was tormented with anger and grief; I
wanted revenge." Then he and his
wife, Nurit Peled (herself now a well-known peace activist), realized that
revenge would do no good because "the blame rests with the occupation. The
suicide bomber was a victim just like my daughter, grown crazy out of anger and
shame. I don't forgive and I don't forget, but when this happened to my daughter
I had to ask myself whether I'd contributed in any way. The answer was that I
had -- my people had, for ruling, dominating and oppressing three-and-a-half
million Palestinians for 35 years."
That's another important Gandhian insight: Not only are
we connected to our so-called "enemies" as victims; we're also inescapably
linked to those who do violence in our name. We cannot escape responsibility for
that violence. We can only choose either to acquiesce or to resist.
Then Elhanan learned that he and his wife were not alone.
They discovered The Parents Circle - Families Forum, which brings together Israelis and
Palestinians who have lost family members to violence from the other side and
realized that reconciliation is better than hatred and revenge. Some 800 people from both sides have now
joined the group. Rami Elhanan, who serves on PCFF's board of directors, devotes
his life to what he calls the "sacred mission" of spreading its message. "You can not correct one evil or a wrong
by creating another evil," he says.
In true Gandhian fashion, he extends compassion and
understanding to both sides in the conflict, including his fellow Israeli Jews.
Most of them "never saw the other side," he explains, "not the anger, not the
pain...not the story... nothing. When the other side started to bite back, after 37
long years of humiliation without any democratic rights, Israelis were
overwhelmed and shocked. ... From this fear came the anger. From the anger came a
very strong public demand for a wall to hide behind."
In equally true Gandhian fashion, he rejects the idea of
severing connection with fellow humans, especially when they are neighbors: "I don't believe in walls. I do not
think walls create good neighbors. ... Walls create hate, especially if you build
it in the middle of your neighbor's living room instead of your own backyard. As
a Jew, the most alarming thing for me is that my people ... are creating their own
ghetto. It will not protect us. ... It will make us give up any connection with
our neighbors. It will make us feel full of power when we are really powerless.
The price of this wall is too high. It will put the very
existence of the state of Israel in jeopardy."
Still in the Gandhian vein, Rami Elhanan extends the web
of responsibility to the whole world, "and the world's behavior is a shame!
Today, while these two crazy peoples are massacring each other without any
mercy, the free and civilized world led by the US is not only standing aside but
rather supporting one side unconditionally at the expense of both sides,
prolonging the suffering of both sides."
Like Gandhi, though, his mission is not to criticize and
complain. It is to inspire the will to change, "to convey this very simple
truth: We must break down this wall of hatred and fear that divides our two
nations. We must turn our pain into hope."
Hundreds of Israeli Jews who have lost loved ones to
violence have embraced this message. But Rami Elhanan stands out as an Israeli
Gandhi because he has taken the vital step from inspiring talk to an act of
resistance that involved a risk of serious injury or even death.
As the Irene was leaving its port in Cyprus, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) chief of
staff went out of his way to warn publicly that "we do not dismiss the
possibility of casualties" on ships bound for Gaza. Just before the Irene was stopped
by the Israelis, Elhanan said: "They're demanding that we stop and threatening that
should we fail to do so there may be injuries. We are continuing at full force."
Elhanan and the other Jews on board the Irene understood the coded message. They
knew that the IDF had killed nine activists at sea on a similar mission last
May. They knew the risk they were taking by continuing at full force. Yet they
went ahead.
This time no was killed or seriously injured. But there
was a major casualty: truth, which is always the first casualty in war. The
Israeli naval commandos who interdicted the Irene did commit something like an
act of war, using excessive force, including tasering -- and then an Israeli military spokseman lied, claiming that the
incident was totally peaceful.
There was no need for the violence, since the activists
were totally peaceful. But it's easy to imagine why the commandos who seized the
Irene lashed out at fellow Jews. The Irene's voyage did what all acts of
Gandhian resistance should do: force the oppressors and their hired hands into a
situation that makes them face the truth of their own immoral actions, in full
public view.
Gandhi was sure that this would, eventually, "melt the
stoniest heart." It seems the
Israeli military has not yet faced enough nonviolent resistance to melt. But the
commandos' harsh response suggests they may have been so badly confused and
embarrassed that they lost control of themselves.
Or perhaps the violence was a calculated measure, ordered
by the IDF's upper echelon, to send a signal to the world that the Israelis will
strike back at anyone -- even their own people -- who shines too clear a light
on the suffering in Gaza. When the IDF's chief spokesman dismissed
the Irene's voyage as a stunt "to generate media attention and (stage) a
provocation," he may have been more accurately describing the IDF's response.
There is no reason to think this will deter
nonviolent activists in Israel from continuing acts of resistance to the
blockade of Gaza -- nor to the occupation of the
West Bank, where Israeli Jews continue to stand
with Palestinians against Israeli violence. Rami Elhanan is hardly unique among
his people in his commitment to risk all for the moral truth. Others show the
same kind of courage. Their example will surely inspire more and more Israelis
to spread the spirit of Gandhi throughout their land, as long as their
government continues to block the path to a just peace.
Finally, a personal note: Elhanan's
father-in-law was Israeli General Matti Peled -- the man who, more than anyone
else, inspired me to become a Jewish peace activist when I heard him speak here
in Colorado,
nearly 35 years ago. I never met the General personally. He had no way of
knowing how deeply his words affected me, leading me to a path that has me
writing about his own family's quest for peace and justice all these years
later.
We can never predict, or even know, the full impact of
our words and deeds. Nor, as Gandhi taught, should we judge the value of our
words and deeds by the impact that we can see. The test is only whether we
follow, pursue, and insist upon moral truth, whether we say and do what is
right. Rami Elhanan is among the
Israeli Jews who have surely passed that test.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof complained a
while back that he was still "waiting for Gandhi" in Palestine. I complained, in turn, that it was hypocritical for Kristof to
bewail, and perpetuate the stereotype of, the "violent" Palestinians. Instead he
should stay home and call for a new Gandhi here in the U.S., which perpetuates Middle East violence by
so consistently supporting Israel, despite its abuses. Latest example: The feeble statement from the State Department that the U.S. is
"disappointed" to see the Israelis resume settlement expansion.
But if Kristof and others need to travel
abroad in search of a new Gandhi, it's worth asking why they go to Palestine and not to Israel. After
all, Palestinian violence against Israel has virtually ceased. It's the
Israelis who now inflict nearly all the violence. Shouldn't we be looking for the Israeli
Gandhi?
The search might not take as long as you think. There are
plenty of Israeli Jews nonviolently resisting their own government's policies of
occupation and oppression. The latest to find the public spotlight is Rami
Elhanan, a former Israeli soldier who joined other Jewish activists from
Israel and around the world as
sailors for peace and justice on a boat called the Irene. They were headed for
Gaza -- bringing
medical equipment, fishing nets, textbooks, toys, prosthetic limbs, and other
humanitarian supplies, aiming to break the Israeli blockade that deprives the
Gazans of such desperately needed materials -- when the Israeli military seized
them on the high seas.
Rami Elhanan said that he was on the Irene because it was his "moral duty"
to act in support of Palestinians in Gaza, because reconciliation is the surest path
to peace. That note of duty is certainly a Gandhian touch. But what qualifies
him even more as the Israeli Jewish Gandhi is another comment he made to a
reporter: "Those 1.5 million people
in Gaza are
victims exactly as I am."
That comes close to the heart of Gandhian nonviolence.
It's far more than just resisting the impulse to strike out at your enemy. It's
the realization that, as Gandhi put it, "for one who follows the doctrine of
ahimsa [nonviolence], there is no room for an enemy; he denies the existence of
an enemy." And it's the willingness to put your life on the line for the truth
that we have no enemies, because we are all equally participants in, and victims
of, the same system of violence.
Rami Elhanan did not learn that lesson from studying
Gandhi. He learned it from the cruelest experience imaginable: seeing his 14-year-old daughter Smadar
killed in a suicide bombing in 1997. At first, he says, he had the natural reaction: "I was tormented with anger and grief; I
wanted revenge." Then he and his
wife, Nurit Peled (herself now a well-known peace activist), realized that
revenge would do no good because "the blame rests with the occupation. The
suicide bomber was a victim just like my daughter, grown crazy out of anger and
shame. I don't forgive and I don't forget, but when this happened to my daughter
I had to ask myself whether I'd contributed in any way. The answer was that I
had -- my people had, for ruling, dominating and oppressing three-and-a-half
million Palestinians for 35 years."
That's another important Gandhian insight: Not only are
we connected to our so-called "enemies" as victims; we're also inescapably
linked to those who do violence in our name. We cannot escape responsibility for
that violence. We can only choose either to acquiesce or to resist.
Then Elhanan learned that he and his wife were not alone.
They discovered The Parents Circle - Families Forum, which brings together Israelis and
Palestinians who have lost family members to violence from the other side and
realized that reconciliation is better than hatred and revenge. Some 800 people from both sides have now
joined the group. Rami Elhanan, who serves on PCFF's board of directors, devotes
his life to what he calls the "sacred mission" of spreading its message. "You can not correct one evil or a wrong
by creating another evil," he says.
In true Gandhian fashion, he extends compassion and
understanding to both sides in the conflict, including his fellow Israeli Jews.
Most of them "never saw the other side," he explains, "not the anger, not the
pain...not the story... nothing. When the other side started to bite back, after 37
long years of humiliation without any democratic rights, Israelis were
overwhelmed and shocked. ... From this fear came the anger. From the anger came a
very strong public demand for a wall to hide behind."
In equally true Gandhian fashion, he rejects the idea of
severing connection with fellow humans, especially when they are neighbors: "I don't believe in walls. I do not
think walls create good neighbors. ... Walls create hate, especially if you build
it in the middle of your neighbor's living room instead of your own backyard. As
a Jew, the most alarming thing for me is that my people ... are creating their own
ghetto. It will not protect us. ... It will make us give up any connection with
our neighbors. It will make us feel full of power when we are really powerless.
The price of this wall is too high. It will put the very
existence of the state of Israel in jeopardy."
Still in the Gandhian vein, Rami Elhanan extends the web
of responsibility to the whole world, "and the world's behavior is a shame!
Today, while these two crazy peoples are massacring each other without any
mercy, the free and civilized world led by the US is not only standing aside but
rather supporting one side unconditionally at the expense of both sides,
prolonging the suffering of both sides."
Like Gandhi, though, his mission is not to criticize and
complain. It is to inspire the will to change, "to convey this very simple
truth: We must break down this wall of hatred and fear that divides our two
nations. We must turn our pain into hope."
Hundreds of Israeli Jews who have lost loved ones to
violence have embraced this message. But Rami Elhanan stands out as an Israeli
Gandhi because he has taken the vital step from inspiring talk to an act of
resistance that involved a risk of serious injury or even death.
As the Irene was leaving its port in Cyprus, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) chief of
staff went out of his way to warn publicly that "we do not dismiss the
possibility of casualties" on ships bound for Gaza. Just before the Irene was stopped
by the Israelis, Elhanan said: "They're demanding that we stop and threatening that
should we fail to do so there may be injuries. We are continuing at full force."
Elhanan and the other Jews on board the Irene understood the coded message. They
knew that the IDF had killed nine activists at sea on a similar mission last
May. They knew the risk they were taking by continuing at full force. Yet they
went ahead.
This time no was killed or seriously injured. But there
was a major casualty: truth, which is always the first casualty in war. The
Israeli naval commandos who interdicted the Irene did commit something like an
act of war, using excessive force, including tasering -- and then an Israeli military spokseman lied, claiming that the
incident was totally peaceful.
There was no need for the violence, since the activists
were totally peaceful. But it's easy to imagine why the commandos who seized the
Irene lashed out at fellow Jews. The Irene's voyage did what all acts of
Gandhian resistance should do: force the oppressors and their hired hands into a
situation that makes them face the truth of their own immoral actions, in full
public view.
Gandhi was sure that this would, eventually, "melt the
stoniest heart." It seems the
Israeli military has not yet faced enough nonviolent resistance to melt. But the
commandos' harsh response suggests they may have been so badly confused and
embarrassed that they lost control of themselves.
Or perhaps the violence was a calculated measure, ordered
by the IDF's upper echelon, to send a signal to the world that the Israelis will
strike back at anyone -- even their own people -- who shines too clear a light
on the suffering in Gaza. When the IDF's chief spokesman dismissed
the Irene's voyage as a stunt "to generate media attention and (stage) a
provocation," he may have been more accurately describing the IDF's response.
There is no reason to think this will deter
nonviolent activists in Israel from continuing acts of resistance to the
blockade of Gaza -- nor to the occupation of the
West Bank, where Israeli Jews continue to stand
with Palestinians against Israeli violence. Rami Elhanan is hardly unique among
his people in his commitment to risk all for the moral truth. Others show the
same kind of courage. Their example will surely inspire more and more Israelis
to spread the spirit of Gandhi throughout their land, as long as their
government continues to block the path to a just peace.
Finally, a personal note: Elhanan's
father-in-law was Israeli General Matti Peled -- the man who, more than anyone
else, inspired me to become a Jewish peace activist when I heard him speak here
in Colorado,
nearly 35 years ago. I never met the General personally. He had no way of
knowing how deeply his words affected me, leading me to a path that has me
writing about his own family's quest for peace and justice all these years
later.
We can never predict, or even know, the full impact of
our words and deeds. Nor, as Gandhi taught, should we judge the value of our
words and deeds by the impact that we can see. The test is only whether we
follow, pursue, and insist upon moral truth, whether we say and do what is
right. Rami Elhanan is among the
Israeli Jews who have surely passed that test.
New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof complained a
while back that he was still "waiting for Gandhi" in Palestine. I complained, in turn, that it was hypocritical for Kristof to
bewail, and perpetuate the stereotype of, the "violent" Palestinians. Instead he
should stay home and call for a new Gandhi here in the U.S., which perpetuates Middle East violence by
so consistently supporting Israel, despite its abuses. Latest example: The feeble statement from the State Department that the U.S. is
"disappointed" to see the Israelis resume settlement expansion.
But if Kristof and others need to travel
abroad in search of a new Gandhi, it's worth asking why they go to Palestine and not to Israel. After
all, Palestinian violence against Israel has virtually ceased. It's the
Israelis who now inflict nearly all the violence. Shouldn't we be looking for the Israeli
Gandhi?
The search might not take as long as you think. There are
plenty of Israeli Jews nonviolently resisting their own government's policies of
occupation and oppression. The latest to find the public spotlight is Rami
Elhanan, a former Israeli soldier who joined other Jewish activists from
Israel and around the world as
sailors for peace and justice on a boat called the Irene. They were headed for
Gaza -- bringing
medical equipment, fishing nets, textbooks, toys, prosthetic limbs, and other
humanitarian supplies, aiming to break the Israeli blockade that deprives the
Gazans of such desperately needed materials -- when the Israeli military seized
them on the high seas.
Rami Elhanan said that he was on the Irene because it was his "moral duty"
to act in support of Palestinians in Gaza, because reconciliation is the surest path
to peace. That note of duty is certainly a Gandhian touch. But what qualifies
him even more as the Israeli Jewish Gandhi is another comment he made to a
reporter: "Those 1.5 million people
in Gaza are
victims exactly as I am."
That comes close to the heart of Gandhian nonviolence.
It's far more than just resisting the impulse to strike out at your enemy. It's
the realization that, as Gandhi put it, "for one who follows the doctrine of
ahimsa [nonviolence], there is no room for an enemy; he denies the existence of
an enemy." And it's the willingness to put your life on the line for the truth
that we have no enemies, because we are all equally participants in, and victims
of, the same system of violence.
Rami Elhanan did not learn that lesson from studying
Gandhi. He learned it from the cruelest experience imaginable: seeing his 14-year-old daughter Smadar
killed in a suicide bombing in 1997. At first, he says, he had the natural reaction: "I was tormented with anger and grief; I
wanted revenge." Then he and his
wife, Nurit Peled (herself now a well-known peace activist), realized that
revenge would do no good because "the blame rests with the occupation. The
suicide bomber was a victim just like my daughter, grown crazy out of anger and
shame. I don't forgive and I don't forget, but when this happened to my daughter
I had to ask myself whether I'd contributed in any way. The answer was that I
had -- my people had, for ruling, dominating and oppressing three-and-a-half
million Palestinians for 35 years."
That's another important Gandhian insight: Not only are
we connected to our so-called "enemies" as victims; we're also inescapably
linked to those who do violence in our name. We cannot escape responsibility for
that violence. We can only choose either to acquiesce or to resist.
Then Elhanan learned that he and his wife were not alone.
They discovered The Parents Circle - Families Forum, which brings together Israelis and
Palestinians who have lost family members to violence from the other side and
realized that reconciliation is better than hatred and revenge. Some 800 people from both sides have now
joined the group. Rami Elhanan, who serves on PCFF's board of directors, devotes
his life to what he calls the "sacred mission" of spreading its message. "You can not correct one evil or a wrong
by creating another evil," he says.
In true Gandhian fashion, he extends compassion and
understanding to both sides in the conflict, including his fellow Israeli Jews.
Most of them "never saw the other side," he explains, "not the anger, not the
pain...not the story... nothing. When the other side started to bite back, after 37
long years of humiliation without any democratic rights, Israelis were
overwhelmed and shocked. ... From this fear came the anger. From the anger came a
very strong public demand for a wall to hide behind."
In equally true Gandhian fashion, he rejects the idea of
severing connection with fellow humans, especially when they are neighbors: "I don't believe in walls. I do not
think walls create good neighbors. ... Walls create hate, especially if you build
it in the middle of your neighbor's living room instead of your own backyard. As
a Jew, the most alarming thing for me is that my people ... are creating their own
ghetto. It will not protect us. ... It will make us give up any connection with
our neighbors. It will make us feel full of power when we are really powerless.
The price of this wall is too high. It will put the very
existence of the state of Israel in jeopardy."
Still in the Gandhian vein, Rami Elhanan extends the web
of responsibility to the whole world, "and the world's behavior is a shame!
Today, while these two crazy peoples are massacring each other without any
mercy, the free and civilized world led by the US is not only standing aside but
rather supporting one side unconditionally at the expense of both sides,
prolonging the suffering of both sides."
Like Gandhi, though, his mission is not to criticize and
complain. It is to inspire the will to change, "to convey this very simple
truth: We must break down this wall of hatred and fear that divides our two
nations. We must turn our pain into hope."
Hundreds of Israeli Jews who have lost loved ones to
violence have embraced this message. But Rami Elhanan stands out as an Israeli
Gandhi because he has taken the vital step from inspiring talk to an act of
resistance that involved a risk of serious injury or even death.
As the Irene was leaving its port in Cyprus, the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) chief of
staff went out of his way to warn publicly that "we do not dismiss the
possibility of casualties" on ships bound for Gaza. Just before the Irene was stopped
by the Israelis, Elhanan said: "They're demanding that we stop and threatening that
should we fail to do so there may be injuries. We are continuing at full force."
Elhanan and the other Jews on board the Irene understood the coded message. They
knew that the IDF had killed nine activists at sea on a similar mission last
May. They knew the risk they were taking by continuing at full force. Yet they
went ahead.
This time no was killed or seriously injured. But there
was a major casualty: truth, which is always the first casualty in war. The
Israeli naval commandos who interdicted the Irene did commit something like an
act of war, using excessive force, including tasering -- and then an Israeli military spokseman lied, claiming that the
incident was totally peaceful.
There was no need for the violence, since the activists
were totally peaceful. But it's easy to imagine why the commandos who seized the
Irene lashed out at fellow Jews. The Irene's voyage did what all acts of
Gandhian resistance should do: force the oppressors and their hired hands into a
situation that makes them face the truth of their own immoral actions, in full
public view.
Gandhi was sure that this would, eventually, "melt the
stoniest heart." It seems the
Israeli military has not yet faced enough nonviolent resistance to melt. But the
commandos' harsh response suggests they may have been so badly confused and
embarrassed that they lost control of themselves.
Or perhaps the violence was a calculated measure, ordered
by the IDF's upper echelon, to send a signal to the world that the Israelis will
strike back at anyone -- even their own people -- who shines too clear a light
on the suffering in Gaza. When the IDF's chief spokesman dismissed
the Irene's voyage as a stunt "to generate media attention and (stage) a
provocation," he may have been more accurately describing the IDF's response.
There is no reason to think this will deter
nonviolent activists in Israel from continuing acts of resistance to the
blockade of Gaza -- nor to the occupation of the
West Bank, where Israeli Jews continue to stand
with Palestinians against Israeli violence. Rami Elhanan is hardly unique among
his people in his commitment to risk all for the moral truth. Others show the
same kind of courage. Their example will surely inspire more and more Israelis
to spread the spirit of Gandhi throughout their land, as long as their
government continues to block the path to a just peace.
Finally, a personal note: Elhanan's
father-in-law was Israeli General Matti Peled -- the man who, more than anyone
else, inspired me to become a Jewish peace activist when I heard him speak here
in Colorado,
nearly 35 years ago. I never met the General personally. He had no way of
knowing how deeply his words affected me, leading me to a path that has me
writing about his own family's quest for peace and justice all these years
later.
We can never predict, or even know, the full impact of
our words and deeds. Nor, as Gandhi taught, should we judge the value of our
words and deeds by the impact that we can see. The test is only whether we
follow, pursue, and insist upon moral truth, whether we say and do what is
right. Rami Elhanan is among the
Israeli Jews who have surely passed that test.
Roger Alford, who was fired over his objections to a corrupt tech merger last month, said MAGA lobbyists and DOJ officials are "determined to exert and expand their influence and enrich themselves."
An antitrust lawyer fired from the US Department of Justice last month accused Attorney General Pam Bondi's underlings on Monday of giving MAGA-aligned corporate lobbyists the ability to "rule" over antitrust enforcement.
Roger Alford, formerly the deputy assistant attorney general in the DOJ's antitrust division, was ousted in July, reportedly for "insubordination" after he objected to the involvement of politically connected lobbyists in the $14 billion merger between Hewlett-Packard Enterprise (HPE) and Juniper Networks.
The DOJ had sued in January to block the merger, arguing that HPE's acquisition of Juniper would unlawfully stifle competition, raise prices for consumers, and harm innovation, since the two entities control over 70% of the wi-fi relied on by large companies, hospitals, universities, and other entities.
But that suit was resolved in June in what the Capitol Forum described as a "highly unusual settlement" in which Bondi's chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, overruled the DOJ's antitrust chief, Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater, to allow the deal to settle.
At the time, left-wing consumer advocates, like Nidhi Hegde, executive director of the American Economic Liberties Project, argued that the deal was "a corrupt and politically rigged merger settlement," which came after political operatives tied to Trump lobbied on behalf of the company.
Despite still describing himself as a staunch MAGA loyalist, Alford likewise feels that the settlement was a "scandal."
In a speech delivered Monday at the Technology Policy Institute in Aspen, Colorado, he said senior DOJ officials "perverted justice and acted inconsistently with the rule of law" by allowing "corrupt lobbyists" to hijack the process.
According to disclosures from HPE, it hired multiple top Trump allies as lobbyists to advocate for the merger. These included MAGA influencer Mike Davis—a right-wing critic of Big Tech and a notorious legal operative responsible for many of Trump's judicial nominations—and Arthur Schwartz, a close adviser and confidante to Donald Trump, Jr. and JD Vance.
According to reporting from the conservative writer Sohrab Ahmari in UnHerd last month, which cites one unnamed senior official, the DOJ's merger settlement was the product of "boozy backroom meetings between company lawyers and lobbyists, on one hand, and officials from elsewhere in the Department of Justice, on the other."
As Ahmari explained:
"Boozy backroom deal" here isn't a figure of speech, by the way. It captures what literally took place, according to the former official, who described a meeting between government officials and lobbyists that took place at one of Washington's "private city clubs" over cocktails.
In an essay for UnHerd adapted from his speech, Alford berated these "MAGA-in-name-only lobbyists and the DOJ officials enabling them," who he said are "determined to exert and expand their influence and enrich themselves as long as their friends are in power."
The current DOJ, Alford continued, has allowed for the "rule of lobbyists" to supplant the "rule of law." While he says this was not true of those idealists serving with him in the antitrust division—including his embattled former boss, Slater—he says that others in the DOJ showed "special solicitude" to lobbyists they perceived to be on the "same MAGA team."
"Too often in the current DOJ," he said, "meetings are accepted and decisions are made depending upon whether the request or information comes from a MAGA friend. Aware of this injustice, companies are hiring lawyers and influence-peddlers to bolster their MAGA credentials and pervert traditional law enforcement."
Alford makes a distinction between these corrupt officials and those he calls "genuine MAGA reformers" who "strive to remain true to President Trump's populist message that resonated with working-class Americans."
While he does not group Bondi in with the officials he deems corrupt, he does blame her for having "delegated authority to figures—such as her chief of staff, Chad Mizelle, and Associate Attorney General-Designee Stanley Woodward—who don't share her commitment to a single tier of justice for all."
"Some progressives may blanche at Alford's praise for [US President Donald] Trump's populist messaging, and insistence that it has been subverted by top DOJ officials selling out to lobbyists," writes David Dayen in the American Prospect.
But Dayen notes that Alford's audience is not progressives and that he is instead "attempting to reach the president and his inner circle by playing on Trump's demand for total loyalty."
The merger between HPE and Juniper can still be stopped under the Tunney Act, which requires it to be reviewed by a federal judge to determine whether settlements brought in federal "antitrust" cases are in the "public interest."
While the Capital Forum says this process is typically a "rubber stamp," they wrote that "given the settlement's atypical substance and process, plus third parties who may be motivated to intervene and a judge who may be inclined to approach the review skeptically, what's normally a quick judicial signoff could turn into a fraught process with wide-reaching implications."
"Indeed, the court should block the HPE-Juniper merger," Alford said. "If you knew what I know, you would hope so, too."
"She won't hold a town hall, she won't take questions," said one protester. "She's never in her office."
Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) got a hostile reception on Monday when she attended an event in the city of Plattsburgh, New York.
As reported by local news station NBC 5, Stefanik was in the city to pay tribute to the late Clinton County Clerk John Zurlo, who died this past December at the age of 86.
During the event, protesters mostly sat in silence until it was Stefanik's turn to speak. At that point, they erupted in angry boos as audience members shouted, "Shame on her!", "You sold us out!", and "Go home!" Demonstrators could also be heard calling Stefanik a "traitor."
Yikes – @EliseStefanik literally got booed off the stage TWICE at an event in her district today.
She hasn't hosted a #NY21 town hall in years. Now we know why. pic.twitter.com/4hsIZmbJyC
— Addison Dick (@addisondick0) August 18, 2025
All told, NBC 5 estimated that at least half of the crowd at the event were there to protest against Stefanik.
After the event, Stefanik lashed out at the protesters who jeered her and forced her off the stage.
"Today's event was about honoring John Zurlo," she said. "It is a disgusting disgrace that this is what the far left does. Rather than understanding that his family has been through a tremendous amount. It was about honoring his legacy."
However, some demonstrators who spoke with NBC 5 countered that they had no other way to reach the congresswoman given that she hasn't held a town hall in several months.
"She has not shown up in our district for months and months," protester Mavis Agnew explained. "She won't hold a town hall, she won't take questions. She's never in her office. People show up at her office constantly, door's closed. Her representatives, her employees won't talk to [us]... So this was her first appearance, the first opportunity we had to let her know we're unhappy."
Other protesters singled out Stefanik's support for the GOP's massive budget package that cut $1 trillion from Medicaid over the next decade and is already endangering the finances of hospitals around the country, including in New York state.
"With the recent cuts that have just been passed, we're all going to be affected by rural hospitals," said protester Jesse Murnane. "Hudson Headwaters [Health Network] potentially being affected, our only clinics available to patients. That's important to me."
The New York Democratic Party was quick to ridicule Stefanik for the angry reaction she displayed at the event.
"Stefanik couldn't handle the heat as she realized in real time that she can't escape her Fox News echo chamber forever while she raises prices, guts healthcare, and hurts New York families," the party said.
Despite the negative reaction to Stefanik at this week's event, she is in little danger of losing her congressional seat, as her district has repeatedly reelected her to office by double-digit margins and is labeled as a "safe Republican" district by Cook Political Report.
Stefanik has represented New York's 21st District since 2015. She is reportedly considering a run for governor in 2026 and said last month that she would reveal her plans after the November elections.
"I will be a senator," said Graham Platner, "for all those who can't buy senators."
Launching a US Senate run to unseat five-term Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins, oyster farmer Graham Platner on Tuesday made clear in his inaugural ad that beating the "fake" moderate also means taking on the power-hungry billionaire class that has helped keep her in power all these years.
The enemy that the vast majority of Americans and Mainers have in common, said Platner, "is the oligarchy."
"It's the billionaires who pay for it," he added. "The politicians who sell us out. And yeah, that means politicians like Susan Collins."
Platner, who told The New York Times political organizers recruited him to enter the race, spoke in the ad about how Maine has "become unlivable for working people."
"Nobody I know around here can afford a house," said Platner. "Healthcare is a disaster, hospitals are closing. We have watched all of that get ripped away from us, and everyone's just trying to keep it all together."
My name is Graham Platner and I’m running for US Senate to defeat Susan Collins and topple the oligarchy that’s destroying our country.
I’m a veteran, oysterman, and working class Mainer who’s seen this state become unlivable for working people. And that makes me deeply angry. pic.twitter.com/QZfAm528N1
— Graham Platner for Senate (@grahamformaine) August 19, 2025
Maine has the 11th-highest cost of living in the country, and according to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Living Wage Calculator, the state's minimum wage of $14.65 doesn't qualify as a living wage for single adults, married couples, or parents—even if both parents work full time.
The fact that many Mainers have to "work two or three different jobs" to survive—as nearly 8% of workers do in the state—"makes me deeply angry," said Platner.
The oyster farmer and local planning board chair is a veteran of both the U.S. Army and Marine Corps, and his campaign platform includes calls for ending homelessness among veterans and fully funding job training and healthcare for those who have served in the armed forces.
But Platner's tone in his opening campaign video contrasted with that other veterans who have been recruited by Democrats to run for public office, like former Kentucky Senate candidate Amy McGrath and a number of former service members who the party is currently pushing to run in 2026 in the hopes that they'll be seen as "politically moderate."
"There is a very tired playbook that the Democrats have run for a while where DC chooses establishment candidates that they base upon their fundraising capacity, and in 2020... they just got battered, and Susan Collins held the seat," Platner told Zeteo, referring to Democrats' decision to run state House Speaker Sara Gideon, who lost by nearly nine points despite vastly outraising Collins. "So in my opinion, we need to be doing something else. I mean, clearly that is a failed strategy."
Platner explicitly called for far-reaching, progressive policies that would serve all Americans—those that are frequently lambasted as dangerous "socialist" ideas by conservatives and dismissed as "unrealistic" by centrist Democrats.
"Why can't we have universal healthcare like every other first-world country?" asked Platner. "Why are we funding endless wars and bombing children? Why are CEOs more powerful than unions? We've fought three different wars since the last time we raised the minimum wage."
On his campaign website, Platner added that he would "be a strong supporter of a Medicare for All system, moving away from the for-profit insurance system that has brought us nothing but grief," protect Social Security, push for a "billionaire minimum tax," "fight for urgent action on climate change," and strengthen legislation to ensure that "enforcement against massive polluters and repeat offenders does not depend upon the whims of whoever happens to be president."
In an interview with Politico, Platner said that if elected, he would not support Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) as the party's leader in the Senate, saying that "the next leader needs to be one of vision and also somebody who is willing to fight."
Along with House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), Schumer has angered progressives and self-described moderate Democrats alike by voting with Republicans to advance the GOP's spending bill—claiming doing so was necessary to stop a government shutdown—and refusing to endorse New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, who like Platner has centered affordability in his campaign.
Platner has hired Morris Katz, a top strategist for Mamdani, and his campaign so far carries echoes of the mayoral candidate. In addition to unapologetically calling for policies to further economic justice, Platner told Zeteo that Israel's U.S.-backed assault on Gaza, which was a flashpoint in New York City's Democratic primary, is "the ultimate moral test of our time."
Since Mamdani's primary victory in June, Democrats including Jeffries and former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg have claimed the mayoral candidate has not yet proven that his progressive platform has broad appeal.
"I think a lot of people are focused on the leftism, the ideological leftism, that I think we shouldn't be so surprised that prevailed in a New York Democratic Party primary," Buttigieg told NPR last month. "But I think if my party wants to learn lessons from Mamdani's success that are portable to a place like Michigan, where I live, it's less about the ideology and more about the message discipline of focusing on what people care about and the tactical wisdom of getting out there and talking to everybody."
Platner, who is one of six declared Democratic primary candidates in a race that could also soon include Gov. Janet Mills, appears intent on proving that defeating the oligarchy and the billionaires who have outsized influence on US politics and fighting for policies aimed at improving all Americans' lives are winning ideas even in the largely rural state of Maine.
"While my platform spans many issues, I view most of my job as a US senator as to do two things," reads Platner's website. "One, to ban billionaires buying elections; two, to dismantle the 'billionaire economy' in favor of an economy that works for the American worker, for small business, for the vast majority of Americans."
"I will be a senator," the platform reads, "for all those who can't buy senators."