Echoing at the Extremes
This weekend, at a panel on the U.S./Mexico border in Marfa, Texas,
GRITv friend, reporter Mark Danner discussed the "thinning out" and
hardening of politics.
When there's insecurity, violence and threat, he noted, people flock
to those who promise to deliver security and stability even at the cost
of their personal liberties. Iraq, Afghanistan, Mexico--whomever offers
protection attracts popular support.
This weekend, at a panel on the U.S./Mexico border in Marfa, Texas,
GRITv friend, reporter Mark Danner discussed the "thinning out" and
hardening of politics.
When there's insecurity, violence and threat, he noted, people flock
to those who promise to deliver security and stability even at the cost
of their personal liberties. Iraq, Afghanistan, Mexico--whomever offers
protection attracts popular support.
But that's not only true in visibly war-torn countries. It's true
here too. Don't you think? The economy hasn't recovered, no matter how
many reports proclaim that the recession ended and millions cast about
for answers, for someone to blame, someone who promises to help.
The middle of the spectrum, Danner noted, thins out while the
extremes thicken and grow more powerful. Funny how here in the U.S.
we've only heard about one extreme: the Tea Party movement, the angry,
anti-government, pro-gun, far white. The money media loves their rallies
and their politicians. Wacky views make great cable news.
So what about other views? Views that might be considered the other
end of the "extreme" spectrum remain unspeakable. Suggest that Obama is a
socialist Kenyan Nazi Muslim and you might end up winning a primary
campaign. Suggest that Bush and Cheney ought to be prosecuted for
torture and other war crimes, and you're ostracized. Why is that?
Perhaps the reason that we've only heard from one extreme in this
time of crisis is that those in the money media fear that the other,
leftist sort might actually gain traction. As Americans feel the ground
shifting beneath them, nothing's more critical than controlling what's
out there, on offer, on which to hold tight.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This weekend, at a panel on the U.S./Mexico border in Marfa, Texas,
GRITv friend, reporter Mark Danner discussed the "thinning out" and
hardening of politics.
When there's insecurity, violence and threat, he noted, people flock
to those who promise to deliver security and stability even at the cost
of their personal liberties. Iraq, Afghanistan, Mexico--whomever offers
protection attracts popular support.
But that's not only true in visibly war-torn countries. It's true
here too. Don't you think? The economy hasn't recovered, no matter how
many reports proclaim that the recession ended and millions cast about
for answers, for someone to blame, someone who promises to help.
The middle of the spectrum, Danner noted, thins out while the
extremes thicken and grow more powerful. Funny how here in the U.S.
we've only heard about one extreme: the Tea Party movement, the angry,
anti-government, pro-gun, far white. The money media loves their rallies
and their politicians. Wacky views make great cable news.
So what about other views? Views that might be considered the other
end of the "extreme" spectrum remain unspeakable. Suggest that Obama is a
socialist Kenyan Nazi Muslim and you might end up winning a primary
campaign. Suggest that Bush and Cheney ought to be prosecuted for
torture and other war crimes, and you're ostracized. Why is that?
Perhaps the reason that we've only heard from one extreme in this
time of crisis is that those in the money media fear that the other,
leftist sort might actually gain traction. As Americans feel the ground
shifting beneath them, nothing's more critical than controlling what's
out there, on offer, on which to hold tight.
This weekend, at a panel on the U.S./Mexico border in Marfa, Texas,
GRITv friend, reporter Mark Danner discussed the "thinning out" and
hardening of politics.
When there's insecurity, violence and threat, he noted, people flock
to those who promise to deliver security and stability even at the cost
of their personal liberties. Iraq, Afghanistan, Mexico--whomever offers
protection attracts popular support.
But that's not only true in visibly war-torn countries. It's true
here too. Don't you think? The economy hasn't recovered, no matter how
many reports proclaim that the recession ended and millions cast about
for answers, for someone to blame, someone who promises to help.
The middle of the spectrum, Danner noted, thins out while the
extremes thicken and grow more powerful. Funny how here in the U.S.
we've only heard about one extreme: the Tea Party movement, the angry,
anti-government, pro-gun, far white. The money media loves their rallies
and their politicians. Wacky views make great cable news.
So what about other views? Views that might be considered the other
end of the "extreme" spectrum remain unspeakable. Suggest that Obama is a
socialist Kenyan Nazi Muslim and you might end up winning a primary
campaign. Suggest that Bush and Cheney ought to be prosecuted for
torture and other war crimes, and you're ostracized. Why is that?
Perhaps the reason that we've only heard from one extreme in this
time of crisis is that those in the money media fear that the other,
leftist sort might actually gain traction. As Americans feel the ground
shifting beneath them, nothing's more critical than controlling what's
out there, on offer, on which to hold tight.