SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Whenever Republicans are at risk of not getting their way for their millionaire constituents, they cry "class warfare."
So it was that House Minority Whip Eric Cantor just whipped out the
old accusation again in the Wall Street Journal, blaming the Democrats
and "the progressive left" for "provocative class warfare rhetoric."
What Cantor doesn't like is the rhetoric.
But he's content with the class warfare, because his class keeps winning, battle after battle, war after war.
Whenever Republicans are at risk of not getting their way for their millionaire constituents, they cry "class warfare."
So it was that House Minority Whip Eric Cantor just whipped out the
old accusation again in the Wall Street Journal, blaming the Democrats
and "the progressive left" for "provocative class warfare rhetoric."
What Cantor doesn't like is the rhetoric.
But he's content with the class warfare, because his class keeps winning, battle after battle, war after war.
Look how much ground the richest of the rich have gained from the
Bush tax cuts, which the Republicans are so intent on keeping for this
cohort. The top 0.1 percent of Americans gained more than $2,326,607 a
piece, whereas people making between thirty and forty thousand gained
only $7,040, according to a great chart in Sunday's New York Times Week in Review.
"Over the past three decades, income inequality has grown dramatically," notes a recent report by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress.
"After remaining relatively constant for much of the post-war era,
the share of total income accrued by the wealthiest 10 percent of
households jumped from 34.6 percent in 1980 to 48.2 percent in 2008.1
Much of the spike was driven by the share of total income accrued by the
richest 1 percent of households. Between 1980 and 2008, their share
rose from 10.0 percent to 21.0 percent, making the United States as one
of the most unequal countries in the world."
Over the last decade, most Americans have been losing ground, with real wages stagnating and household incomes falling.
"Real median income for working-age households is now $4,925 below its peak in the year 2000," according to the Economic Policy Institute.
Right now, they are desperate for tax cuts, and those tax cuts would inject a lot of money into the economy.
Whereas, the top 0.1 percent aren't desperate for tax cuts; they're just greedy.
But in our economy, and in our political system, it's the richest and
the greediest who win the class war, no matter what you call it.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Whenever Republicans are at risk of not getting their way for their millionaire constituents, they cry "class warfare."
So it was that House Minority Whip Eric Cantor just whipped out the
old accusation again in the Wall Street Journal, blaming the Democrats
and "the progressive left" for "provocative class warfare rhetoric."
What Cantor doesn't like is the rhetoric.
But he's content with the class warfare, because his class keeps winning, battle after battle, war after war.
Look how much ground the richest of the rich have gained from the
Bush tax cuts, which the Republicans are so intent on keeping for this
cohort. The top 0.1 percent of Americans gained more than $2,326,607 a
piece, whereas people making between thirty and forty thousand gained
only $7,040, according to a great chart in Sunday's New York Times Week in Review.
"Over the past three decades, income inequality has grown dramatically," notes a recent report by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress.
"After remaining relatively constant for much of the post-war era,
the share of total income accrued by the wealthiest 10 percent of
households jumped from 34.6 percent in 1980 to 48.2 percent in 2008.1
Much of the spike was driven by the share of total income accrued by the
richest 1 percent of households. Between 1980 and 2008, their share
rose from 10.0 percent to 21.0 percent, making the United States as one
of the most unequal countries in the world."
Over the last decade, most Americans have been losing ground, with real wages stagnating and household incomes falling.
"Real median income for working-age households is now $4,925 below its peak in the year 2000," according to the Economic Policy Institute.
Right now, they are desperate for tax cuts, and those tax cuts would inject a lot of money into the economy.
Whereas, the top 0.1 percent aren't desperate for tax cuts; they're just greedy.
But in our economy, and in our political system, it's the richest and
the greediest who win the class war, no matter what you call it.
Whenever Republicans are at risk of not getting their way for their millionaire constituents, they cry "class warfare."
So it was that House Minority Whip Eric Cantor just whipped out the
old accusation again in the Wall Street Journal, blaming the Democrats
and "the progressive left" for "provocative class warfare rhetoric."
What Cantor doesn't like is the rhetoric.
But he's content with the class warfare, because his class keeps winning, battle after battle, war after war.
Look how much ground the richest of the rich have gained from the
Bush tax cuts, which the Republicans are so intent on keeping for this
cohort. The top 0.1 percent of Americans gained more than $2,326,607 a
piece, whereas people making between thirty and forty thousand gained
only $7,040, according to a great chart in Sunday's New York Times Week in Review.
"Over the past three decades, income inequality has grown dramatically," notes a recent report by the Joint Economic Committee of Congress.
"After remaining relatively constant for much of the post-war era,
the share of total income accrued by the wealthiest 10 percent of
households jumped from 34.6 percent in 1980 to 48.2 percent in 2008.1
Much of the spike was driven by the share of total income accrued by the
richest 1 percent of households. Between 1980 and 2008, their share
rose from 10.0 percent to 21.0 percent, making the United States as one
of the most unequal countries in the world."
Over the last decade, most Americans have been losing ground, with real wages stagnating and household incomes falling.
"Real median income for working-age households is now $4,925 below its peak in the year 2000," according to the Economic Policy Institute.
Right now, they are desperate for tax cuts, and those tax cuts would inject a lot of money into the economy.
Whereas, the top 0.1 percent aren't desperate for tax cuts; they're just greedy.
But in our economy, and in our political system, it's the richest and
the greediest who win the class war, no matter what you call it.