Net Neutrality: We're Still Waiting

We're still waiting.

Instead of doing what's right for Internet users, Genachowski has dodged, dithered
and delayed. But it's not too late to turn things around. And
Genachowski's legacy as chair of the FCC - either as a champion of
openness or as a toothless bureaucrat - rests on what he does now.

The path forward seemed much clearer on September 21, 2009, when Genachowski went to the Brookings Institution to deliver his first major speech
as head of the FCC. Genachowski didn't mince words. He declared that
without Net Neutrality protections, "We could see the Internet's doors
shut to entrepreneurs, the spirit of innovation stifled, a full and free
flow of information compromised."

He continued:

"The fact that the internet is evolving rapidly does not
mean we can or should abandon the underlying values fostered by an open
network or the important goal of setting rules of the road to protect
the free and open internet. Saying nothing and doing nothing would
impose its own form of unacceptable cost."

"Doing nothing" didn't seem to be an option. He had a majority of the
votes at the FCC and support from the president and leaders of
Congress.

But what a difference a year can make.

Since his September 2009 Brookings' speech, Genachowski has made
little progress to protect Net Neutrality. He started a rule making
process last October but hasn't made any rules.

To be fair, things got more complicated when a federal appeals court
ruled the FCC lacked the authority to regulate broadband because of some
bad decisions
during the Bush administration. But instead of seizing the opportunity
to restore the agency's ability to protect consumers, Genachowski
wavered and retreated.

He eventually came up with a "Third Way" proposal, then immediately started backing away from his own idea, ducking questions from the media regarding his commitment to the proposal.

Then his top deputy tried to broker a disastrous closed-door deal
with industry that virtually ignored overwhelming public outcry in
favor of a strong Net Neutrality standard. And when Google and Verizon
came forward with a vastly unpopular proposal of their own, the chairman
sputtered some more.

His only response has been to solicit more public input on questions that have already been asked and answered.

Obama's Waffler

Remember, this is the man whom President Obama put into office with
the explicit understanding that his first priority was to protect Net
Neutrality. "I am a strong supporter of Net Neutrality," Obama pledged
in 2007. "As president I'm going to make sure that that is the
principle that my FCC commissioners are applying as we move forward."

It's clear from his own statements that the FCC chairman knows what meaningful rules should look like.

The first thing he must do is restore the FCC's authority to protect Internet users by "reclassifying" broadband under the law. Next, the FCC must enact Net Neutrality rules that safeguard the open Internet for all users, no matter how they get online.

Genachowski has been swamped with public support
for the move but seems intent on inaction - and doing nothing that
would upset the powerful special interests that make up the phone and
cable lobby.

Genachowski now has a choice. He can make a decisive and principled
move to protect Net Neutrality and be remembered as a hero of the
Internet, or he can continue to waffle and be remembered as the FCC head
who stood idle as our online freedoms were handed over to the likes of
AT&T, Comcast and Verizon.

He needs to decide, and soon.