In Israel, Miscegenation Equals Rape
On Monday, Sabbar Kashur, a young Palestinian man from East
Jerusalem, was sentenced to 18 months in prison for something
called "rape
by deception." Apparently, Mr. Kashur had consensual sex with a Jewish
Israeli woman after assuring her that he was also Jewish. When she found out
that he had lied to her, she went to the police.
Imagine living in a society where you can say, "I wish I had never slept
with you. I'm going to the cops." Only it's not funny because Sabbar Kashur
will probably go to jail for a year and a half. Meanwhile, efforts to combat
actual sexual violence are undermined by a cynical distortion of the term rape.
The real crime here, of course, is miscegenation.
Anyone from the US should
recognize the Jerusalem District Court's ruling for what it is: an
anti-miscegenation measure on par with the now-defunct US laws against
"race mixing" that were once used to uphold white supremacy. For most of us in
the US,
dating across race lines now seems about as edgy as wearing white after Labor
Day. But check out Angela Davis' Women, Race and Class for a reminder of how
white Americans' obsessions with "racial purity" were codified to keep African
Americans and white women in their place. That's the paradigm in which we
should understand this case.
In the US,
anti-miscegenation laws were on the books until 1967, when the Supreme Court
declared them unconstitutional. That was the same year that Israel began its occupation of Sabbar Kashur's
home in East Jerusalem. Since then, Israelis
have fine-tuned their own obsession with racial purity. Only they like to call
it "national purity," since Jewish privilege in Israel depends on maintaining the
Jewish character of the state. In fact, race-mixing is perceived as such a
threat that more than half of all Israeli Jews agree that Jewish-Arab
intermarriage is a form of treason.
In the East Jerusalem "neighborhood" (it's
really a settlement) of Pisgat Ze'ev, a group of men who call themselves
"Fire for Judaism" actually patrol the streets in the hopes of spotting
and disrupting relationships between Jewish women and Palestinian men. The
towns of Petah Tikva, Kiryat Gat and even super-liberal Tel Aviv have government-sponsored
municipal programs to prevent miscegenation. The programs include
psychological counseling for Jewish women who stray and a hotline for people to
inform on Jewish women who date Palestinians.
The goal of this week's court ruling (and of Israeli laws governing
marriage, adoption and surrogacy) is to prevent Jews and Palestinians from
forming intimate or family relationships. In the West Bank,
this degree of separation is ensured by a giant concrete wall that runs through
much of the territory. But where there is no wall, the state will rely on other
forms of power to maintain strict separation between the two peoples of this
land. By the way, the Afrikaans word for separation is Apartheid.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
On Monday, Sabbar Kashur, a young Palestinian man from East
Jerusalem, was sentenced to 18 months in prison for something
called "rape
by deception." Apparently, Mr. Kashur had consensual sex with a Jewish
Israeli woman after assuring her that he was also Jewish. When she found out
that he had lied to her, she went to the police.
Imagine living in a society where you can say, "I wish I had never slept
with you. I'm going to the cops." Only it's not funny because Sabbar Kashur
will probably go to jail for a year and a half. Meanwhile, efforts to combat
actual sexual violence are undermined by a cynical distortion of the term rape.
The real crime here, of course, is miscegenation.
Anyone from the US should
recognize the Jerusalem District Court's ruling for what it is: an
anti-miscegenation measure on par with the now-defunct US laws against
"race mixing" that were once used to uphold white supremacy. For most of us in
the US,
dating across race lines now seems about as edgy as wearing white after Labor
Day. But check out Angela Davis' Women, Race and Class for a reminder of how
white Americans' obsessions with "racial purity" were codified to keep African
Americans and white women in their place. That's the paradigm in which we
should understand this case.
In the US,
anti-miscegenation laws were on the books until 1967, when the Supreme Court
declared them unconstitutional. That was the same year that Israel began its occupation of Sabbar Kashur's
home in East Jerusalem. Since then, Israelis
have fine-tuned their own obsession with racial purity. Only they like to call
it "national purity," since Jewish privilege in Israel depends on maintaining the
Jewish character of the state. In fact, race-mixing is perceived as such a
threat that more than half of all Israeli Jews agree that Jewish-Arab
intermarriage is a form of treason.
In the East Jerusalem "neighborhood" (it's
really a settlement) of Pisgat Ze'ev, a group of men who call themselves
"Fire for Judaism" actually patrol the streets in the hopes of spotting
and disrupting relationships between Jewish women and Palestinian men. The
towns of Petah Tikva, Kiryat Gat and even super-liberal Tel Aviv have government-sponsored
municipal programs to prevent miscegenation. The programs include
psychological counseling for Jewish women who stray and a hotline for people to
inform on Jewish women who date Palestinians.
The goal of this week's court ruling (and of Israeli laws governing
marriage, adoption and surrogacy) is to prevent Jews and Palestinians from
forming intimate or family relationships. In the West Bank,
this degree of separation is ensured by a giant concrete wall that runs through
much of the territory. But where there is no wall, the state will rely on other
forms of power to maintain strict separation between the two peoples of this
land. By the way, the Afrikaans word for separation is Apartheid.
On Monday, Sabbar Kashur, a young Palestinian man from East
Jerusalem, was sentenced to 18 months in prison for something
called "rape
by deception." Apparently, Mr. Kashur had consensual sex with a Jewish
Israeli woman after assuring her that he was also Jewish. When she found out
that he had lied to her, she went to the police.
Imagine living in a society where you can say, "I wish I had never slept
with you. I'm going to the cops." Only it's not funny because Sabbar Kashur
will probably go to jail for a year and a half. Meanwhile, efforts to combat
actual sexual violence are undermined by a cynical distortion of the term rape.
The real crime here, of course, is miscegenation.
Anyone from the US should
recognize the Jerusalem District Court's ruling for what it is: an
anti-miscegenation measure on par with the now-defunct US laws against
"race mixing" that were once used to uphold white supremacy. For most of us in
the US,
dating across race lines now seems about as edgy as wearing white after Labor
Day. But check out Angela Davis' Women, Race and Class for a reminder of how
white Americans' obsessions with "racial purity" were codified to keep African
Americans and white women in their place. That's the paradigm in which we
should understand this case.
In the US,
anti-miscegenation laws were on the books until 1967, when the Supreme Court
declared them unconstitutional. That was the same year that Israel began its occupation of Sabbar Kashur's
home in East Jerusalem. Since then, Israelis
have fine-tuned their own obsession with racial purity. Only they like to call
it "national purity," since Jewish privilege in Israel depends on maintaining the
Jewish character of the state. In fact, race-mixing is perceived as such a
threat that more than half of all Israeli Jews agree that Jewish-Arab
intermarriage is a form of treason.
In the East Jerusalem "neighborhood" (it's
really a settlement) of Pisgat Ze'ev, a group of men who call themselves
"Fire for Judaism" actually patrol the streets in the hopes of spotting
and disrupting relationships between Jewish women and Palestinian men. The
towns of Petah Tikva, Kiryat Gat and even super-liberal Tel Aviv have government-sponsored
municipal programs to prevent miscegenation. The programs include
psychological counseling for Jewish women who stray and a hotline for people to
inform on Jewish women who date Palestinians.
The goal of this week's court ruling (and of Israeli laws governing
marriage, adoption and surrogacy) is to prevent Jews and Palestinians from
forming intimate or family relationships. In the West Bank,
this degree of separation is ensured by a giant concrete wall that runs through
much of the territory. But where there is no wall, the state will rely on other
forms of power to maintain strict separation between the two peoples of this
land. By the way, the Afrikaans word for separation is Apartheid.