Jul 21, 2010
Elizabeth Warren should be the top contender to head the new Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. After all, it was her brainchild, her
baby.
But instead of celebrating the leadership and creativity of Harvard
law professor and Congressional Oversight Panel chair Elizabeth Warren,
reports are that she faces opposition from the bankers' BFF, Treasury
Secretary Timothy Geithner. Also, Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, kicked off the whispering
campaign about her appointment with his question, "Is she confirmable?"
It's no mystery why the corporate/big business crowd opposes her.
The effectiveness of the financial reform bill depends entirely on the
regulators-it cedes them new power, but it doesn't mandate systemic
change. So the bankers and lobbyists want to diminish regulation as
much as they can, which means opposing a determined and smart Warren.
Rather than sabotaging Warren's prospects, Dodd and the
administration, especially President Obama, should be touting the fact
that Warren has been one of the leading activists and thinkers about
what the bureau could get done, and that her stewardship led to it being
one of the things we can celebrate in the final bill.
In her folksy, plainspoken way, Warren-who hails from Oklahoma and is
a former Methodist Sunday school teacher-has articulated how
the agency could help ordinary people, providing a small amount of power
in a system that's weighted against them. She has such an honest, fair,
decent and clear way of talking about what government can do to serve
the common good.
"Dang gummit, somebody has got to stand up on behalf of middle-class
families!" she told
the New York Times. She elaborated on this theme on the Daily
Show. "This is America's middle class. We've hacked at it and
pulled at it and chipped at it for thirty years now, and now there's no
more to do. We fix this problem going forward, or the game really is
over."
When the Consumer Protection proposal came under attack in the
Senate-and Dodd was watering it down in order to cut deals with
Republicans who probably weren't going to support it anyway-Warren
continued to fight hard for it. She wrote
about it, she talked
about it. She even approached Ron Howard and got him to shoot this
hilarious video
plugging it as key to any financial reform bill with teeth.
Today, Senator Bernie Sanders welcomed any opposition to a Warren
nomination. "Good!" he wrote. "It will allow for a serious debate as to
the role that government should play in protecting the American people
against the outrageous behavior we have seen on Wall Street."
This agency will rise or fall on how visible it is. Warren would use
the bully pulpit in a way that will once again make government seem like
it's in the business of improving the condition of people's lives.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
© 2023 The Nation
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
Elizabeth Warren should be the top contender to head the new Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. After all, it was her brainchild, her
baby.
But instead of celebrating the leadership and creativity of Harvard
law professor and Congressional Oversight Panel chair Elizabeth Warren,
reports are that she faces opposition from the bankers' BFF, Treasury
Secretary Timothy Geithner. Also, Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, kicked off the whispering
campaign about her appointment with his question, "Is she confirmable?"
It's no mystery why the corporate/big business crowd opposes her.
The effectiveness of the financial reform bill depends entirely on the
regulators-it cedes them new power, but it doesn't mandate systemic
change. So the bankers and lobbyists want to diminish regulation as
much as they can, which means opposing a determined and smart Warren.
Rather than sabotaging Warren's prospects, Dodd and the
administration, especially President Obama, should be touting the fact
that Warren has been one of the leading activists and thinkers about
what the bureau could get done, and that her stewardship led to it being
one of the things we can celebrate in the final bill.
In her folksy, plainspoken way, Warren-who hails from Oklahoma and is
a former Methodist Sunday school teacher-has articulated how
the agency could help ordinary people, providing a small amount of power
in a system that's weighted against them. She has such an honest, fair,
decent and clear way of talking about what government can do to serve
the common good.
"Dang gummit, somebody has got to stand up on behalf of middle-class
families!" she told
the New York Times. She elaborated on this theme on the Daily
Show. "This is America's middle class. We've hacked at it and
pulled at it and chipped at it for thirty years now, and now there's no
more to do. We fix this problem going forward, or the game really is
over."
When the Consumer Protection proposal came under attack in the
Senate-and Dodd was watering it down in order to cut deals with
Republicans who probably weren't going to support it anyway-Warren
continued to fight hard for it. She wrote
about it, she talked
about it. She even approached Ron Howard and got him to shoot this
hilarious video
plugging it as key to any financial reform bill with teeth.
Today, Senator Bernie Sanders welcomed any opposition to a Warren
nomination. "Good!" he wrote. "It will allow for a serious debate as to
the role that government should play in protecting the American people
against the outrageous behavior we have seen on Wall Street."
This agency will rise or fall on how visible it is. Warren would use
the bully pulpit in a way that will once again make government seem like
it's in the business of improving the condition of people's lives.
Katrina Vanden Heuvel
Katrina vanden Heuvel is an American editor and publisher. She is the editor, publisher, and part-owner of the magazine The Nation. She has been the magazine's editor since 1995.
Elizabeth Warren should be the top contender to head the new Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau. After all, it was her brainchild, her
baby.
But instead of celebrating the leadership and creativity of Harvard
law professor and Congressional Oversight Panel chair Elizabeth Warren,
reports are that she faces opposition from the bankers' BFF, Treasury
Secretary Timothy Geithner. Also, Senator Chris Dodd, chairman of the
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee, kicked off the whispering
campaign about her appointment with his question, "Is she confirmable?"
It's no mystery why the corporate/big business crowd opposes her.
The effectiveness of the financial reform bill depends entirely on the
regulators-it cedes them new power, but it doesn't mandate systemic
change. So the bankers and lobbyists want to diminish regulation as
much as they can, which means opposing a determined and smart Warren.
Rather than sabotaging Warren's prospects, Dodd and the
administration, especially President Obama, should be touting the fact
that Warren has been one of the leading activists and thinkers about
what the bureau could get done, and that her stewardship led to it being
one of the things we can celebrate in the final bill.
In her folksy, plainspoken way, Warren-who hails from Oklahoma and is
a former Methodist Sunday school teacher-has articulated how
the agency could help ordinary people, providing a small amount of power
in a system that's weighted against them. She has such an honest, fair,
decent and clear way of talking about what government can do to serve
the common good.
"Dang gummit, somebody has got to stand up on behalf of middle-class
families!" she told
the New York Times. She elaborated on this theme on the Daily
Show. "This is America's middle class. We've hacked at it and
pulled at it and chipped at it for thirty years now, and now there's no
more to do. We fix this problem going forward, or the game really is
over."
When the Consumer Protection proposal came under attack in the
Senate-and Dodd was watering it down in order to cut deals with
Republicans who probably weren't going to support it anyway-Warren
continued to fight hard for it. She wrote
about it, she talked
about it. She even approached Ron Howard and got him to shoot this
hilarious video
plugging it as key to any financial reform bill with teeth.
Today, Senator Bernie Sanders welcomed any opposition to a Warren
nomination. "Good!" he wrote. "It will allow for a serious debate as to
the role that government should play in protecting the American people
against the outrageous behavior we have seen on Wall Street."
This agency will rise or fall on how visible it is. Warren would use
the bully pulpit in a way that will once again make government seem like
it's in the business of improving the condition of people's lives.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.