Do Ask, Don't Tell
The White House has pulled quite a bait and switch on the LGBT community.
LGBT voters came out and contributed en masse to Barack Obama's campaign. A year ago, he promised them action on among other things, repeal of the military's discrimination policy, Don't ask Don't Tell. This May it seemed as if they'd won. To much ballyhoo (on the eve of a war appropriation vote) the White House announced what sounded like repeal.
"Now half the LGBT community thinks Don't Ask Don't Tell is already repealed," Miriam Perez of Feministing told GRITtv.
Except what the President actually announced wasn't repeal. It was a compromise that opened the way for a vote on repeal if a Pentagon working group, the President, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs all approved such a thing.
Now it turns out that 400,000 service members are going to have their say as well.
As the jobless go with nothing and school libraries are shut up tight for lack of cash, we, the taxpayers have, it turns out, paid a research firm some $4.4 million to send an email-survey to 400,000 troops.
Leaked copies include the following questions: "If a wartime situation made it necessary for you to share a room, berth or field tent with someone you believe to be a gay or lesbian service member, what are you likely to do?" (The survey offers options.) "If Don't Ask Don't Tell is repealed and you are assigned to bathroom facilities with open bay showers with a gay or lesbian service member, would you: Take no action? Use shower at different time?" There's also a question asking service members, if a gay or lesbian member moved into military housing with a same-sex partner, would they pick up their family and move out.
There's no question about how troops feel about serving under Don't Ask Don't Tell. And -- no question, this is a first.
No one surveyed the troops when it was time to desegregate. No one surveyed male soldiers about allowing women in. When it came to school desegregation, the Supreme Court didn't survey white kids. In fact it's impossible to imagine such a thing.
About as impossible as imagining that LGBT campaign contributors will be doling out much cash to Democratic candidates this fall.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The White House has pulled quite a bait and switch on the LGBT community.
LGBT voters came out and contributed en masse to Barack Obama's campaign. A year ago, he promised them action on among other things, repeal of the military's discrimination policy, Don't ask Don't Tell. This May it seemed as if they'd won. To much ballyhoo (on the eve of a war appropriation vote) the White House announced what sounded like repeal.
"Now half the LGBT community thinks Don't Ask Don't Tell is already repealed," Miriam Perez of Feministing told GRITtv.
Except what the President actually announced wasn't repeal. It was a compromise that opened the way for a vote on repeal if a Pentagon working group, the President, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs all approved such a thing.
Now it turns out that 400,000 service members are going to have their say as well.
As the jobless go with nothing and school libraries are shut up tight for lack of cash, we, the taxpayers have, it turns out, paid a research firm some $4.4 million to send an email-survey to 400,000 troops.
Leaked copies include the following questions: "If a wartime situation made it necessary for you to share a room, berth or field tent with someone you believe to be a gay or lesbian service member, what are you likely to do?" (The survey offers options.) "If Don't Ask Don't Tell is repealed and you are assigned to bathroom facilities with open bay showers with a gay or lesbian service member, would you: Take no action? Use shower at different time?" There's also a question asking service members, if a gay or lesbian member moved into military housing with a same-sex partner, would they pick up their family and move out.
There's no question about how troops feel about serving under Don't Ask Don't Tell. And -- no question, this is a first.
No one surveyed the troops when it was time to desegregate. No one surveyed male soldiers about allowing women in. When it came to school desegregation, the Supreme Court didn't survey white kids. In fact it's impossible to imagine such a thing.
About as impossible as imagining that LGBT campaign contributors will be doling out much cash to Democratic candidates this fall.
The White House has pulled quite a bait and switch on the LGBT community.
LGBT voters came out and contributed en masse to Barack Obama's campaign. A year ago, he promised them action on among other things, repeal of the military's discrimination policy, Don't ask Don't Tell. This May it seemed as if they'd won. To much ballyhoo (on the eve of a war appropriation vote) the White House announced what sounded like repeal.
"Now half the LGBT community thinks Don't Ask Don't Tell is already repealed," Miriam Perez of Feministing told GRITtv.
Except what the President actually announced wasn't repeal. It was a compromise that opened the way for a vote on repeal if a Pentagon working group, the President, the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs all approved such a thing.
Now it turns out that 400,000 service members are going to have their say as well.
As the jobless go with nothing and school libraries are shut up tight for lack of cash, we, the taxpayers have, it turns out, paid a research firm some $4.4 million to send an email-survey to 400,000 troops.
Leaked copies include the following questions: "If a wartime situation made it necessary for you to share a room, berth or field tent with someone you believe to be a gay or lesbian service member, what are you likely to do?" (The survey offers options.) "If Don't Ask Don't Tell is repealed and you are assigned to bathroom facilities with open bay showers with a gay or lesbian service member, would you: Take no action? Use shower at different time?" There's also a question asking service members, if a gay or lesbian member moved into military housing with a same-sex partner, would they pick up their family and move out.
There's no question about how troops feel about serving under Don't Ask Don't Tell. And -- no question, this is a first.
No one surveyed the troops when it was time to desegregate. No one surveyed male soldiers about allowing women in. When it came to school desegregation, the Supreme Court didn't survey white kids. In fact it's impossible to imagine such a thing.
About as impossible as imagining that LGBT campaign contributors will be doling out much cash to Democratic candidates this fall.