Where's the Outrage? EPA Betrays Coalfields (Again) With New Mountaintop Removal Permit

I'm not sure if the EPA is addled, or downright shameless, but on the
heels of meeting with besieged Appalachian coalfield residents and less
than three months since its ballyhooed new guidance rules to halt reckless
mountaintop removal operations, President Obama's Environmental
Protection Agency has once again gone back on its word and green-lighted
a dangerous mountaintop removal permit in a hair-brained pander

I'm not sure if the EPA is addled, or downright shameless, but on the
heels of meeting with besieged Appalachian coalfield residents and less
than three months since its ballyhooed new guidance rules to halt reckless
mountaintop removal operations, President Obama's Environmental
Protection Agency has once again gone back on its word and green-lighted
a dangerous mountaintop removal permit in a hair-brained pander to Big
Coal that will knowingly destroy miles of critical headwater streams.

The piss poor week of coal news this week makes the BP disaster look
like a cake walk. If only I could be glib and declare: The more things
change, the more things stay the same. Peabody Energy announced they're
opening a massive strip mine in Mongolia that will dwarf
Wyoming's Powder River Basin to "solve world poverty"; Australia's strip mines continue to disappear historic
communities; and the NY Times pointed out that Big Coal receives over $100 billion annually
in welfare from Europe.

In the case of the Appalachian coalfields, where millions of pounds of
ammonium nitrate fuel oil explosives are detonated daily in historic
mountain communities and American citizens live in contaminated
watersheds, the EPA's giddy support for the St. Louis-based Arch
Coal's Pine Creek strip mine in Logan County, West Virginia is not only a
travesty, but a costly one.

Logan County is already under assault for flooding, due to extensive
strip mines in the area.

And the misguided decision, alas, comes at such a sad moment--the same
week of the death of legendary West Virginia Senator Robert Byrd, who announced only one month ago:

If the process of mining destroys nearby wells and foundations, if
blasting and digging and relocating streams unearths harmful elements
and releases them into the environment causing illness and death, that
process should be halted and the resulting hazards to the community
abated.

Exactly one year ago, EPA official John Pomponio testified before the
Senate that mountaintop removal irreversibly destroyed headwater
streams. Pomponio declared:

"These little streams are like capillaries in your blood system,"
Pomponio said. "They're what travel through the landscape and capture
the pollutants, clean those pollutants. And we frankly don't know where
the tipping point is in losing one stream, five streams, or 18 streams
in a particular watershed."

Last week, Pomponio authored the letter to the US Army Corps of
Engineers, which allows Arch Coal to go forth with its mountaintop
removal operation, after making changes to its application that will
affect only 22% of the damage--which means, 78 % of the estimated 14,000
feet of critical streams will be destroyed.

In his letter, Pomponio lauds Arch Coal's efforts to create artificial
ditches as replacements for natural headwaters, a bogus "mitigating"
effort that Dr. Margaret Palmer decried as too
ineffective to support the native aquatic community in the same historic
Senate hearing last year.

"This is a devastating first decision under guidelines that had offered
so much hope for Appalachian residents who thought the EPA was standing
up for their health and water quality in the face of a horrific mining
practice," said Amanda Starbuck of the Rainforest Action Network. "The grand words
being spoken by Administrator Jackson in Washington are simply not being
reflected in the EPA's actions on-the-ground. This continues the
inconsistent and contradictory decisions that have plagued the EPA's
process on mountaintop removal coal mining all along."

For West Virginia coal miner's widow Lorelei Scarbro and leader with the
Alliance for Appalachia, who has met numerous times with the EPA, the
decision is nothing less than an act of betrayal to the Appalachian
people. In a personal letter to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson
yesterday, Scarbro wrote:

I just finished reading what amounts to a green light by Region 3 EPA on
the Pine Creek permit in Logan County, WV. I have to say that this
disturbs me. I have been involved in the battle to stop, not regulate,
mountaintop removal coal mining since the coal mine moved in next door
to my home at the base of Coal River Mountain in Rock Creek, WV. I
watched my husband die of black lung after 35 years as an underground
union coal miner. I watch as people I love get sicker each day from
contaminated water after raising their family in Prenter Hollow, WV.

I have left my very peaceful home 3 miles up in Rock Creek and traveled
to DC many times in the past 2 years to help the powers that be to
really see the face of coal. I hope that by telling the people on
Capitol Hill how the decisions they make affect the lives of the people
in the mountain communities they might begin to see us as valuable. Too
often we are treated like collateral damage or just the price of doing
business. I have been in many meetings with David Evans, Brian Fraizer
and many others at EPA in DC and Region 3. I have met with CEQ, OSMRE
and many other regulatory agencies and countless numbers of Senators and
Congressmen trying to make a difference.

I was on the call on April 1 when you released the guidance for
conductivity levels and I was very excited when I heard you say " You're
talking about no or very few valley fills that are going to be able to
meet standards like this." The release of this guidance and your words
brought hope to many people that long ago lost it.

I have been very thankful for all of the steps this EPA has taken to
improve life in the mountain communities of Appalachia, but I was
heartbroken when I saw the decision on Pine Creek. Although I live about
1 1/2 hours from this area I stand with the citizens there and I fear
that this is just the beginning of many more permit releases. We
believed you when you spoke about "zeroing out valley fills". Where I am
from, sometimes all you have is your word. People here have
historically made life altering decisions on nothing more than a
handshake and their word.

I am a 54 year old widow of a coal miner and the most important thing to
me is clean drinking water for my grandchildren. I don't believe that
is possible if we continue to destroy and cover head water streams in Appalachia. Once again, I have
lost hope. Please don't let this be the final word on Pine Creek Surface
Mine.

The EPA's pander is a wakeup call that nothing less than an act to
abolish mountaintop removal operations, such as the Clean Water
Protection Act, will bring this egregious human rights and environmental
violation to an end.

To this end, the Alliance for Appalachia needs your help--they need
donations
to get this important ad on national TV to bring home the
cost of the catastrophe of mountaintop removal and strip mining to
coal-fired consumers--including Lisa Jackson and the EPA--across the
nation.

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.