SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Pentagon's Window of Vulnerability?
When it comes to the Pentagon and
the U.S. military, wherever you look,
there's money being handed out. Wildly and in staggering amounts.
Early this month, for instance, the U.S. Army announced that it had awarded KBR,
the private contractor which was once part of Halliburton, a contract worth up
to $568 million through 2011 "for military support service in
Iraq."
May 21, 2010
When it comes to the Pentagon and
the U.S. military, wherever you look,
there's money being handed out. Wildly and in staggering amounts.
Early this month, for instance, the U.S. Army announced that it had awarded KBR,
the private contractor which was once part of Halliburton, a contract worth up
to $568 million through 2011 "for military support service in
Iraq."
This is the same KBR that has regularly
been accused of improprieties of all sorts. As it happened, the Army made its
announcement, noted Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News, "only
hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the
Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on
Iraq-related work." Even though the company has been the object of
numerous investigations and law suits, and is the Blackwater (now Xe) of
construction firms, as well
as a prime victor in the Bush administration's military privatization
sweepstakes, this was a no-bid contract. Given the Pentagon's spending
track record, none of this should surprise you.
Or consider Mission Essential Personnel, a firm that, unlike KBR or Halliburton, you've
undoubtedly never heard of. No wonder: only three years ago, it was a tiny
military contractor taking in $6 million a year. Recently, however, it
garnered a one-year $679 million contract to "field a small city's worth of
translators to help out American forces in Afghanistan." (And again --
surprise, surprise! -- a no-bid contract.) "Not bad," writes the invaluable Noah Shachtman at his Danger Room website, "for a
company that's been accused of everything from abandoning wounded employees
to sending out-of-shape interpreters to the front
lines."
Or here's another Shachtman find: defense
contractor Booz Allen Hamilton managed to
corner a bevy of contracts
worth $400 million in recent weeks to help fight future cyberwars, despite a
stated Pentagon policy of relying less on outside contractors. In fact, the
Pentagon is only now -- and only modestly -- reining in its long-running "senior
mentors" program in which retired generals and admirals on the payroll of
defense contractors (and on military pensions ranging up to $220,000 a year) are
brought back as consultants at prices that run to $440 per hour. "In some
cases," reports USA Today, "mentors were paid
by the military to run war games involving weapons systems made by their
consulting clients."
Theoretically, the military is known for
discipline -- but not, it seems, when what's at stake is either spending our
money or keeping track of it. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Pentagon
budget, few in this country have cared to pay much attention. Fortunately,
the National Priorities Project has. It has been trying to put
the realities of that ever more bloated
budget on the national
agenda for a while. In a recent piece, "Putting the Pentagon on a
Diet," NPP's Christopher Hellman
suggests that a window of opportunity is opening, even if only a crack at the
moment, for doing just that. The question is: Will we pry it open further
or slam it shut?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 TomDispatch.com
Tom Engelhardt
The above piece, published here with permission, first appeared at Tom Engelhardt's substack page, where you can find more of his writing.
Engelhardt, was editor-in-chief of TomDispatch.com for over 24 years, is the author of numerous books, including: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
When it comes to the Pentagon and
the U.S. military, wherever you look,
there's money being handed out. Wildly and in staggering amounts.
Early this month, for instance, the U.S. Army announced that it had awarded KBR,
the private contractor which was once part of Halliburton, a contract worth up
to $568 million through 2011 "for military support service in
Iraq."
This is the same KBR that has regularly
been accused of improprieties of all sorts. As it happened, the Army made its
announcement, noted Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News, "only
hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the
Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on
Iraq-related work." Even though the company has been the object of
numerous investigations and law suits, and is the Blackwater (now Xe) of
construction firms, as well
as a prime victor in the Bush administration's military privatization
sweepstakes, this was a no-bid contract. Given the Pentagon's spending
track record, none of this should surprise you.
Or consider Mission Essential Personnel, a firm that, unlike KBR or Halliburton, you've
undoubtedly never heard of. No wonder: only three years ago, it was a tiny
military contractor taking in $6 million a year. Recently, however, it
garnered a one-year $679 million contract to "field a small city's worth of
translators to help out American forces in Afghanistan." (And again --
surprise, surprise! -- a no-bid contract.) "Not bad," writes the invaluable Noah Shachtman at his Danger Room website, "for a
company that's been accused of everything from abandoning wounded employees
to sending out-of-shape interpreters to the front
lines."
Or here's another Shachtman find: defense
contractor Booz Allen Hamilton managed to
corner a bevy of contracts
worth $400 million in recent weeks to help fight future cyberwars, despite a
stated Pentagon policy of relying less on outside contractors. In fact, the
Pentagon is only now -- and only modestly -- reining in its long-running "senior
mentors" program in which retired generals and admirals on the payroll of
defense contractors (and on military pensions ranging up to $220,000 a year) are
brought back as consultants at prices that run to $440 per hour. "In some
cases," reports USA Today, "mentors were paid
by the military to run war games involving weapons systems made by their
consulting clients."
Theoretically, the military is known for
discipline -- but not, it seems, when what's at stake is either spending our
money or keeping track of it. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Pentagon
budget, few in this country have cared to pay much attention. Fortunately,
the National Priorities Project has. It has been trying to put
the realities of that ever more bloated
budget on the national
agenda for a while. In a recent piece, "Putting the Pentagon on a
Diet," NPP's Christopher Hellman
suggests that a window of opportunity is opening, even if only a crack at the
moment, for doing just that. The question is: Will we pry it open further
or slam it shut?
Tom Engelhardt
The above piece, published here with permission, first appeared at Tom Engelhardt's substack page, where you can find more of his writing.
Engelhardt, was editor-in-chief of TomDispatch.com for over 24 years, is the author of numerous books, including: "A Nation Unmade by War" (2018, Dispatch Books), "Shadow Government: Surveillance, Secret Wars, and a Global Security State in a Single-Superpower World" (2014, with an introduction by Glenn Greenwald), "Terminator Planet: The First History of Drone Warfare, 2001-2050"(co-authored with Nick Turse), "The United States of Fear" (2011), "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" (2010), and "The End of Victory Culture: a History of the Cold War and Beyond" (2007).
When it comes to the Pentagon and
the U.S. military, wherever you look,
there's money being handed out. Wildly and in staggering amounts.
Early this month, for instance, the U.S. Army announced that it had awarded KBR,
the private contractor which was once part of Halliburton, a contract worth up
to $568 million through 2011 "for military support service in
Iraq."
This is the same KBR that has regularly
been accused of improprieties of all sorts. As it happened, the Army made its
announcement, noted Tony Capaccio of Bloomberg News, "only
hours after the Justice Department said it will pursue a lawsuit accusing the
Houston-based company of taking kickbacks from two subcontractors on
Iraq-related work." Even though the company has been the object of
numerous investigations and law suits, and is the Blackwater (now Xe) of
construction firms, as well
as a prime victor in the Bush administration's military privatization
sweepstakes, this was a no-bid contract. Given the Pentagon's spending
track record, none of this should surprise you.
Or consider Mission Essential Personnel, a firm that, unlike KBR or Halliburton, you've
undoubtedly never heard of. No wonder: only three years ago, it was a tiny
military contractor taking in $6 million a year. Recently, however, it
garnered a one-year $679 million contract to "field a small city's worth of
translators to help out American forces in Afghanistan." (And again --
surprise, surprise! -- a no-bid contract.) "Not bad," writes the invaluable Noah Shachtman at his Danger Room website, "for a
company that's been accused of everything from abandoning wounded employees
to sending out-of-shape interpreters to the front
lines."
Or here's another Shachtman find: defense
contractor Booz Allen Hamilton managed to
corner a bevy of contracts
worth $400 million in recent weeks to help fight future cyberwars, despite a
stated Pentagon policy of relying less on outside contractors. In fact, the
Pentagon is only now -- and only modestly -- reining in its long-running "senior
mentors" program in which retired generals and admirals on the payroll of
defense contractors (and on military pensions ranging up to $220,000 a year) are
brought back as consultants at prices that run to $440 per hour. "In some
cases," reports USA Today, "mentors were paid
by the military to run war games involving weapons systems made by their
consulting clients."
Theoretically, the military is known for
discipline -- but not, it seems, when what's at stake is either spending our
money or keeping track of it. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Pentagon
budget, few in this country have cared to pay much attention. Fortunately,
the National Priorities Project has. It has been trying to put
the realities of that ever more bloated
budget on the national
agenda for a while. In a recent piece, "Putting the Pentagon on a
Diet," NPP's Christopher Hellman
suggests that a window of opportunity is opening, even if only a crack at the
moment, for doing just that. The question is: Will we pry it open further
or slam it shut?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy