SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Solving a Problem Like Stupak
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
Apr 13, 2010
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 GRITtv
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.