SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Solving a Problem Like Stupak
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
Apr 13, 2010
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 GRITtv
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
Laura Flanders
Laura Flanders interviews forward-thinking people about the key questions of our time on The Laura Flanders Show, a nationally syndicated radio and television program also available as a podcast. A contributing writer to The Nation, Flanders is also the author of six books, including "Bushwomen: How They Won the White House for Their Man" (2005). She is the recipient of a 2019 Izzy Award for excellence in independent journalism, the Pat Mitchell Lifetime Achievement Award for advancing women's and girls' visibility in media, and a 2020 Lannan Cultural Freedom Fellowship for her reporting and advocacy for public media. lauraflanders.org
The man who earned the enmity of pro-choicers across America--and
earned himself a primary challenge--with his grandstanding over the
rights of women in health care reform has decided not to run for
reelection, stating as his reason that the bill he did his best to kill
got passed.
Is it time to celebrate? Rep. Stupak, from upper Michigan,
represents a chunk of rural residents who tended, before him, to elect
Republicans. He's now found himself in the unenviable position of being
hated by women's rights advocates AND the criminalization crowd, both.
In terms of gains for Democrats, Michael Moore has noted that Stupak
hasn't been all bad -- he's supported gun control legislation, taking
on the NRA -- Moore calls him a "decent guy." Now he's politically
defunct.
Stupak, in other words, is the most prominent face of a big
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
problem for progressives within the Democratic party: what to do about
the conservadems? They may snatch a seat from the GOP, but what's the
good, if they spend most of their time in office fighting against the
party and wearing down the supposedly Democratic agenda while they're
at it.
The good news in this case, is there's no longer any reason for
Democrats in Michigan not to support prochoice former schoolteacher
Connie Saltonstall for Stupak's seat.
But the bigger question's this. What's politics? If you're a party
that claims to have beliefs, do you go to where the voters are,
perfecting the art of the easy road to a graspable majority? Or is
politics, rather, the effort to shift opinion towards what you believe
is right? The worst outcome of all is Stupak's -- falling victim to a
bit of both.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.