

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Here's a sobering fact on World Water Day: Coal-fired power plants
use approximately 1.5 trillion gallons of water a year in the US.
In many respects, some folks might use more water flicking on their
lights, than chugging back a glass of that wondrous stuff.
Makes you wonder: Has the EPA ever tabulated the external costs of
coal on our water resources?
And then, after that refreshing drink of desperately needed water,
the 600-odd coal-fired plants typically throw up their chemically
enhanced processed wastewater into our rivers and waterways, poisoning
our own drinking water.
According to a recent analysis of EPA data, the NY Times
concluded:
"Power plants are the nation's biggest producer of toxic
waste, surpassing industries like plastic and paint manufacturing and
chemical plants."But the cleaner air has come at a cost. Each day since the equipment was
switched on in June, the company has dumped tens of thousands of
gallons of wastewater containing chemicals from the scrubbing process
into the Monongahela River, which provides drinking water to 350,000
people and flows into Pittsburgh, 40 miles to the north."It's like they decided to spare us having to breathe in these
poisons, but now we have to drink them instead," said Philip Coleman,
who lives about 15 miles from the plant and has asked a state judge to
toughen the facility's pollution regulations. "We can't escape."Even as a growing number of coal-burning power plants around the
nation have moved to reduce their air emissions, many of them are
creating another problem: water pollution.
Not that the coal industry hasn't already fouled our headwaters and
waterways through strip-mining and underground mining pollution. As the
NY Times reported in their amazing "Toxic Waters" series, communities
across the coalfields of Appalachia do not have access to drinking water,
due to the contamination of their watersheds and wells from coal slurry.
Mountaintop removal mining alone has destroyed over 2,000 miles of
streams and waterways in Appalachia--given that strip-mining takes place
in over 20 states, feel free to extrapolate the impact of this
devastating mining process and legally permitted toxic discharges to
watersheds and stream for thousands of communities across the nation.
(On the northern Arizona reservations, Peabody Energy pumped out an
estimated one billion gallons of scarce water per year to operate its
slurry operations at the Black Mesa strip mine--which was recently
denied a life-of-mine permit.)
In the meantime, underground longwall mining--the reckless process of
removing pillars from underground mines and allowing for massive
subsidence--is plundering the water sources in the farm belt of Illinois, and across coal states
like Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Peruse these stats as you drink today:
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists:
A typical 500-megawatt coal-fired power plant draws about 2.2 billion
gallons of water each year from nearby water bodies, such as lakes,
rivers, or oceans, to create steam for turning its turbines. This is
enough water to support a city of approximately 250,000 people.
And here's a graph of water violations from coal-fired plants in
eastern and Midwestern states, based on the NY Times analysis of the EPA
data:

And here's an interesting video from a local battle in Georgia to halt
plans for the Washington power plant:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Here's a sobering fact on World Water Day: Coal-fired power plants
use approximately 1.5 trillion gallons of water a year in the US.
In many respects, some folks might use more water flicking on their
lights, than chugging back a glass of that wondrous stuff.
Makes you wonder: Has the EPA ever tabulated the external costs of
coal on our water resources?
And then, after that refreshing drink of desperately needed water,
the 600-odd coal-fired plants typically throw up their chemically
enhanced processed wastewater into our rivers and waterways, poisoning
our own drinking water.
According to a recent analysis of EPA data, the NY Times
concluded:
"Power plants are the nation's biggest producer of toxic
waste, surpassing industries like plastic and paint manufacturing and
chemical plants."But the cleaner air has come at a cost. Each day since the equipment was
switched on in June, the company has dumped tens of thousands of
gallons of wastewater containing chemicals from the scrubbing process
into the Monongahela River, which provides drinking water to 350,000
people and flows into Pittsburgh, 40 miles to the north."It's like they decided to spare us having to breathe in these
poisons, but now we have to drink them instead," said Philip Coleman,
who lives about 15 miles from the plant and has asked a state judge to
toughen the facility's pollution regulations. "We can't escape."Even as a growing number of coal-burning power plants around the
nation have moved to reduce their air emissions, many of them are
creating another problem: water pollution.
Not that the coal industry hasn't already fouled our headwaters and
waterways through strip-mining and underground mining pollution. As the
NY Times reported in their amazing "Toxic Waters" series, communities
across the coalfields of Appalachia do not have access to drinking water,
due to the contamination of their watersheds and wells from coal slurry.
Mountaintop removal mining alone has destroyed over 2,000 miles of
streams and waterways in Appalachia--given that strip-mining takes place
in over 20 states, feel free to extrapolate the impact of this
devastating mining process and legally permitted toxic discharges to
watersheds and stream for thousands of communities across the nation.
(On the northern Arizona reservations, Peabody Energy pumped out an
estimated one billion gallons of scarce water per year to operate its
slurry operations at the Black Mesa strip mine--which was recently
denied a life-of-mine permit.)
In the meantime, underground longwall mining--the reckless process of
removing pillars from underground mines and allowing for massive
subsidence--is plundering the water sources in the farm belt of Illinois, and across coal states
like Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Peruse these stats as you drink today:
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists:
A typical 500-megawatt coal-fired power plant draws about 2.2 billion
gallons of water each year from nearby water bodies, such as lakes,
rivers, or oceans, to create steam for turning its turbines. This is
enough water to support a city of approximately 250,000 people.
And here's a graph of water violations from coal-fired plants in
eastern and Midwestern states, based on the NY Times analysis of the EPA
data:

And here's an interesting video from a local battle in Georgia to halt
plans for the Washington power plant:
Here's a sobering fact on World Water Day: Coal-fired power plants
use approximately 1.5 trillion gallons of water a year in the US.
In many respects, some folks might use more water flicking on their
lights, than chugging back a glass of that wondrous stuff.
Makes you wonder: Has the EPA ever tabulated the external costs of
coal on our water resources?
And then, after that refreshing drink of desperately needed water,
the 600-odd coal-fired plants typically throw up their chemically
enhanced processed wastewater into our rivers and waterways, poisoning
our own drinking water.
According to a recent analysis of EPA data, the NY Times
concluded:
"Power plants are the nation's biggest producer of toxic
waste, surpassing industries like plastic and paint manufacturing and
chemical plants."But the cleaner air has come at a cost. Each day since the equipment was
switched on in June, the company has dumped tens of thousands of
gallons of wastewater containing chemicals from the scrubbing process
into the Monongahela River, which provides drinking water to 350,000
people and flows into Pittsburgh, 40 miles to the north."It's like they decided to spare us having to breathe in these
poisons, but now we have to drink them instead," said Philip Coleman,
who lives about 15 miles from the plant and has asked a state judge to
toughen the facility's pollution regulations. "We can't escape."Even as a growing number of coal-burning power plants around the
nation have moved to reduce their air emissions, many of them are
creating another problem: water pollution.
Not that the coal industry hasn't already fouled our headwaters and
waterways through strip-mining and underground mining pollution. As the
NY Times reported in their amazing "Toxic Waters" series, communities
across the coalfields of Appalachia do not have access to drinking water,
due to the contamination of their watersheds and wells from coal slurry.
Mountaintop removal mining alone has destroyed over 2,000 miles of
streams and waterways in Appalachia--given that strip-mining takes place
in over 20 states, feel free to extrapolate the impact of this
devastating mining process and legally permitted toxic discharges to
watersheds and stream for thousands of communities across the nation.
(On the northern Arizona reservations, Peabody Energy pumped out an
estimated one billion gallons of scarce water per year to operate its
slurry operations at the Black Mesa strip mine--which was recently
denied a life-of-mine permit.)
In the meantime, underground longwall mining--the reckless process of
removing pillars from underground mines and allowing for massive
subsidence--is plundering the water sources in the farm belt of Illinois, and across coal states
like Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
Peruse these stats as you drink today:
According to the Union of Concerned Scientists:
A typical 500-megawatt coal-fired power plant draws about 2.2 billion
gallons of water each year from nearby water bodies, such as lakes,
rivers, or oceans, to create steam for turning its turbines. This is
enough water to support a city of approximately 250,000 people.
And here's a graph of water violations from coal-fired plants in
eastern and Midwestern states, based on the NY Times analysis of the EPA
data:

And here's an interesting video from a local battle in Georgia to halt
plans for the Washington power plant: