Progressives Should Not Follow Kucinich on Health Care
I don't blame Dennis Kucinich for changing his mind and deciding to
vote for Obama's health care reform bill.
The bill does have its merits: It greatly expands Medicaid coverage,
it increases funding for community health centers, and it subsidizes
people who don't have a lot of money to buy health care insurance. And
depending on the fine print, the bill may end discrimination against
people with preexisting conditions.
Plus, Obama and the Democratic leadership were putting enormous
pressure on him, and I'm sure he didn't want to hand the Republicans an
undeserved trophy.
But the bill is still grossly inadequate, as Kucinich himself
recognizes.
The bill is still a giant giveaway to the insurance companies, as
Kucinich has said many times.
The bill is nowhere near as good as single-payer, which Kucinich has
campaigned for time and time again.
Most of the benefits of the bill would kick in until 2014.
And the bill does a grave disservice to women, not only by
restricting abortion coverage but by allowing insurance companies to
discriminate in their pricing against women, as Dr. Sheila Levitt of
Physicians for a National Health Program recently
wrote.
Even though Kucinich now gives this bill his blessing, that doesn't
mean that all progressive citizens need to follow suit.
Howard Zinn, a couple of years before he died, put the issue
perfectly:
"When a social movement adopts the compromises of legislators, it has
forgotten its role, which is to push and challenge the politicians, not
to fall meekly behind them," he wrote.
He added: "The mantra 'the best we can get' is a recipe for
corruption. We are not politicians, but citizens. We have no office to
hold on to, only our consciences."
So let's hold on to our consciences and demand better.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
I don't blame Dennis Kucinich for changing his mind and deciding to
vote for Obama's health care reform bill.
The bill does have its merits: It greatly expands Medicaid coverage,
it increases funding for community health centers, and it subsidizes
people who don't have a lot of money to buy health care insurance. And
depending on the fine print, the bill may end discrimination against
people with preexisting conditions.
Plus, Obama and the Democratic leadership were putting enormous
pressure on him, and I'm sure he didn't want to hand the Republicans an
undeserved trophy.
But the bill is still grossly inadequate, as Kucinich himself
recognizes.
The bill is still a giant giveaway to the insurance companies, as
Kucinich has said many times.
The bill is nowhere near as good as single-payer, which Kucinich has
campaigned for time and time again.
Most of the benefits of the bill would kick in until 2014.
And the bill does a grave disservice to women, not only by
restricting abortion coverage but by allowing insurance companies to
discriminate in their pricing against women, as Dr. Sheila Levitt of
Physicians for a National Health Program recently
wrote.
Even though Kucinich now gives this bill his blessing, that doesn't
mean that all progressive citizens need to follow suit.
Howard Zinn, a couple of years before he died, put the issue
perfectly:
"When a social movement adopts the compromises of legislators, it has
forgotten its role, which is to push and challenge the politicians, not
to fall meekly behind them," he wrote.
He added: "The mantra 'the best we can get' is a recipe for
corruption. We are not politicians, but citizens. We have no office to
hold on to, only our consciences."
So let's hold on to our consciences and demand better.
I don't blame Dennis Kucinich for changing his mind and deciding to
vote for Obama's health care reform bill.
The bill does have its merits: It greatly expands Medicaid coverage,
it increases funding for community health centers, and it subsidizes
people who don't have a lot of money to buy health care insurance. And
depending on the fine print, the bill may end discrimination against
people with preexisting conditions.
Plus, Obama and the Democratic leadership were putting enormous
pressure on him, and I'm sure he didn't want to hand the Republicans an
undeserved trophy.
But the bill is still grossly inadequate, as Kucinich himself
recognizes.
The bill is still a giant giveaway to the insurance companies, as
Kucinich has said many times.
The bill is nowhere near as good as single-payer, which Kucinich has
campaigned for time and time again.
Most of the benefits of the bill would kick in until 2014.
And the bill does a grave disservice to women, not only by
restricting abortion coverage but by allowing insurance companies to
discriminate in their pricing against women, as Dr. Sheila Levitt of
Physicians for a National Health Program recently
wrote.
Even though Kucinich now gives this bill his blessing, that doesn't
mean that all progressive citizens need to follow suit.
Howard Zinn, a couple of years before he died, put the issue
perfectly:
"When a social movement adopts the compromises of legislators, it has
forgotten its role, which is to push and challenge the politicians, not
to fall meekly behind them," he wrote.
He added: "The mantra 'the best we can get' is a recipe for
corruption. We are not politicians, but citizens. We have no office to
hold on to, only our consciences."
So let's hold on to our consciences and demand better.