The 13-year congressman lamented the lack of change in economic policies, tying it to the major problems Democrats are facing.
RECOMMENDED...
Everyone is Dennis Kucinich Now
The results in Massachusetts, Arkansas, New York, Ohio and Indiana
show that Democrats are probably a lot closer to Dennis Kucinich than
they are to the so-called "centrists" like Joe Lieberman whose
corporatism has dictated the terms of the Senate health care bill. Raw
Story spoke to Kucinich:
Jan 21, 2010
The results in Massachusetts, Arkansas, New York, Ohio and Indiana
show that Democrats are probably a lot closer to Dennis Kucinich than
they are to the so-called "centrists" like Joe Lieberman whose
corporatism has dictated the terms of the Senate health care bill. Raw
Story spoke to Kucinich:
The 13-year congressman lamented the lack of change in economic policies, tying it to the major problems Democrats are facing.
"The minute the president appointed Tim Geithner and Larry Summers
to key policy positions, and the minute that [Ben] Bernanke was named
to head the Fed again, we're looking at people who participated in the
decline of the economy," he said. "This group has done us a
disservice."Ironically Obama is citing Paul Volker this morning, who
has scrapped with Summers and Geithner and been marginalized within the
administration up until now.
What does Kucinich think of the health care bill?
"Health care became too complex and too
riddled with concessions to insurance companies and pharmaceutical
companies," he said. "It's really time to take a new direction and that
direction has to be back to the American people."One idea Democrats are floating is to pass the Senate bill through
the House, which would then allow the President to sign it into law."I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "The senate bill is
so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House
to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it.""It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get
health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care
benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?""We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed
with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing
taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness.""We're redistributing the wealth of the nation upwards by giving the
insurance companies 30 million new customers, $50 billion a year more
in revenue."
Meanwhile, Matt Yglesias
continues the "attack the character of the President's critics" tactic
that has been the hallmark of the Senate bill's apologist. He says Raul Grijalva is flirting with the title of "history's greatest monster" status.
The reason for this? Well, Grijalva doesn't accept the "60 vote" myth
that has been used to push the false choice of "what Joe Lieberman
wants or nothing." Harry Reid, Chris Van Hollen and Kent Conrad have
all now said that "sidecar reconciliation" is possible. Max Baucus has
gone so far as to say "reconciliation will be part of the solution."
The price of continuing to cling to that myth should be obvious by
now: the Senate health care bill in its current form threatens to
decimate the Democratic party. The general public continues to echo
Kucinich's sentiments about the bill -- and the administration's
pro-corporatist approach -- without respect for party. It's only a tiny
bubble of self-reinforcing pundits living in a hermetically sealed
intellectual environment whose worldview has not been penetrated by
that reality. It would be easier to accept the notion that they are
acting in good faith if they didn't seek to demonize those who have
advanced very compelling reasons for disagreeing with the articles of
faith of their worldview, which at this point only represents a teeny,
tiny minority of the public.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 FireDogLake
The results in Massachusetts, Arkansas, New York, Ohio and Indiana
show that Democrats are probably a lot closer to Dennis Kucinich than
they are to the so-called "centrists" like Joe Lieberman whose
corporatism has dictated the terms of the Senate health care bill. Raw
Story spoke to Kucinich:
The 13-year congressman lamented the lack of change in economic policies, tying it to the major problems Democrats are facing.
"The minute the president appointed Tim Geithner and Larry Summers
to key policy positions, and the minute that [Ben] Bernanke was named
to head the Fed again, we're looking at people who participated in the
decline of the economy," he said. "This group has done us a
disservice."Ironically Obama is citing Paul Volker this morning, who
has scrapped with Summers and Geithner and been marginalized within the
administration up until now.
What does Kucinich think of the health care bill?
"Health care became too complex and too
riddled with concessions to insurance companies and pharmaceutical
companies," he said. "It's really time to take a new direction and that
direction has to be back to the American people."One idea Democrats are floating is to pass the Senate bill through
the House, which would then allow the President to sign it into law."I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "The senate bill is
so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House
to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it.""It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get
health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care
benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?""We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed
with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing
taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness.""We're redistributing the wealth of the nation upwards by giving the
insurance companies 30 million new customers, $50 billion a year more
in revenue."
Meanwhile, Matt Yglesias
continues the "attack the character of the President's critics" tactic
that has been the hallmark of the Senate bill's apologist. He says Raul Grijalva is flirting with the title of "history's greatest monster" status.
The reason for this? Well, Grijalva doesn't accept the "60 vote" myth
that has been used to push the false choice of "what Joe Lieberman
wants or nothing." Harry Reid, Chris Van Hollen and Kent Conrad have
all now said that "sidecar reconciliation" is possible. Max Baucus has
gone so far as to say "reconciliation will be part of the solution."
The price of continuing to cling to that myth should be obvious by
now: the Senate health care bill in its current form threatens to
decimate the Democratic party. The general public continues to echo
Kucinich's sentiments about the bill -- and the administration's
pro-corporatist approach -- without respect for party. It's only a tiny
bubble of self-reinforcing pundits living in a hermetically sealed
intellectual environment whose worldview has not been penetrated by
that reality. It would be easier to accept the notion that they are
acting in good faith if they didn't seek to demonize those who have
advanced very compelling reasons for disagreeing with the articles of
faith of their worldview, which at this point only represents a teeny,
tiny minority of the public.
The results in Massachusetts, Arkansas, New York, Ohio and Indiana
show that Democrats are probably a lot closer to Dennis Kucinich than
they are to the so-called "centrists" like Joe Lieberman whose
corporatism has dictated the terms of the Senate health care bill. Raw
Story spoke to Kucinich:
The 13-year congressman lamented the lack of change in economic policies, tying it to the major problems Democrats are facing.
"The minute the president appointed Tim Geithner and Larry Summers
to key policy positions, and the minute that [Ben] Bernanke was named
to head the Fed again, we're looking at people who participated in the
decline of the economy," he said. "This group has done us a
disservice."Ironically Obama is citing Paul Volker this morning, who
has scrapped with Summers and Geithner and been marginalized within the
administration up until now.
What does Kucinich think of the health care bill?
"Health care became too complex and too
riddled with concessions to insurance companies and pharmaceutical
companies," he said. "It's really time to take a new direction and that
direction has to be back to the American people."One idea Democrats are floating is to pass the Senate bill through
the House, which would then allow the President to sign it into law."I don't think that's going to happen," he said. "The senate bill is
so totally flawed that I don't think it can get the votes in the House
to pass. I certainly wouldn't vote for it.""It hits very sharply at people who gave wage concessions to get
health care benefits," he said, citing the excise tax on health care
benefits. "We're going to ask Americans to take a wage cut? Why?""We lost the initiative the minute that our party jumped into bed
with the insurance companies. And soon they were looking at increasing
taxes as a way of subsidizing insurance companies. It's just madness.""We're redistributing the wealth of the nation upwards by giving the
insurance companies 30 million new customers, $50 billion a year more
in revenue."
Meanwhile, Matt Yglesias
continues the "attack the character of the President's critics" tactic
that has been the hallmark of the Senate bill's apologist. He says Raul Grijalva is flirting with the title of "history's greatest monster" status.
The reason for this? Well, Grijalva doesn't accept the "60 vote" myth
that has been used to push the false choice of "what Joe Lieberman
wants or nothing." Harry Reid, Chris Van Hollen and Kent Conrad have
all now said that "sidecar reconciliation" is possible. Max Baucus has
gone so far as to say "reconciliation will be part of the solution."
The price of continuing to cling to that myth should be obvious by
now: the Senate health care bill in its current form threatens to
decimate the Democratic party. The general public continues to echo
Kucinich's sentiments about the bill -- and the administration's
pro-corporatist approach -- without respect for party. It's only a tiny
bubble of self-reinforcing pundits living in a hermetically sealed
intellectual environment whose worldview has not been penetrated by
that reality. It would be easier to accept the notion that they are
acting in good faith if they didn't seek to demonize those who have
advanced very compelling reasons for disagreeing with the articles of
faith of their worldview, which at this point only represents a teeny,
tiny minority of the public.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.