SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Comcast, the nation's biggest cable and broadband Internet company, has plans to take over NBC Universal.
The result would be a new kind of media monster that would not only produce some of America's most popular entertainment but also control viewers' access to it.
Comcast, the nation's biggest cable and broadband Internet company, has plans to take over NBC Universal.
The result would be a new kind of media monster that would not only produce some of America's most popular entertainment but also control viewers' access to it.
Under the deal, which has been in the works for months, Comcast would pay $6.5 billion in cash up front and contribute $7.25 billion in cable assets to acquire a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal from its current owner, General Electric. Comcast would control the joint venture's day-to-day operations but Pentagon contractor GE would retain a 49 percent stake.
The likely impact on consumer choices? Well you tell me: the Washington Post reports that all in all, the joint venture would control more than one out of every five television-viewing hours.
The $30 billion deal certainly has consumer groups and lawmakers worried. Will there be a big regulatory battle? Congress doesn't have a great record. In 1996, a Democratic President OK'd the last great concentration of media power under the generous terms of the '96 Telecommunications Act.
Nonetheless, with almost one in four cable subscribers in the U.S. a Comcast customer and NBC Universal owning not only NBC but also dozens of cable channels, including Telemundo, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo as well as theme parks, TV stations such as Washington's WRC (Channel 4), and Universal movie studios, the NBC Comcast deal is a biggie.
Senators John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Commerce Committee, and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), of the Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, have called for hearings. Michael J. Copps, a Democratic member of the Federal Communications Commission, says the merger faces a "very steep climb" with him.
High on the list of critics' concerns are worries about the impact on online video. Would Comcast/NBC continue to make other companies' video available free, on their internet providers? Why would they? Only if government enforces Net Neutrality. In other words, only if there's a law.
In the meantime, it's time to cherish ever more all that remains in the way of independent media. And yes, that's our self interest speaking.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Comcast, the nation's biggest cable and broadband Internet company, has plans to take over NBC Universal.
The result would be a new kind of media monster that would not only produce some of America's most popular entertainment but also control viewers' access to it.
Under the deal, which has been in the works for months, Comcast would pay $6.5 billion in cash up front and contribute $7.25 billion in cable assets to acquire a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal from its current owner, General Electric. Comcast would control the joint venture's day-to-day operations but Pentagon contractor GE would retain a 49 percent stake.
The likely impact on consumer choices? Well you tell me: the Washington Post reports that all in all, the joint venture would control more than one out of every five television-viewing hours.
The $30 billion deal certainly has consumer groups and lawmakers worried. Will there be a big regulatory battle? Congress doesn't have a great record. In 1996, a Democratic President OK'd the last great concentration of media power under the generous terms of the '96 Telecommunications Act.
Nonetheless, with almost one in four cable subscribers in the U.S. a Comcast customer and NBC Universal owning not only NBC but also dozens of cable channels, including Telemundo, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo as well as theme parks, TV stations such as Washington's WRC (Channel 4), and Universal movie studios, the NBC Comcast deal is a biggie.
Senators John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Commerce Committee, and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), of the Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, have called for hearings. Michael J. Copps, a Democratic member of the Federal Communications Commission, says the merger faces a "very steep climb" with him.
High on the list of critics' concerns are worries about the impact on online video. Would Comcast/NBC continue to make other companies' video available free, on their internet providers? Why would they? Only if government enforces Net Neutrality. In other words, only if there's a law.
In the meantime, it's time to cherish ever more all that remains in the way of independent media. And yes, that's our self interest speaking.
Comcast, the nation's biggest cable and broadband Internet company, has plans to take over NBC Universal.
The result would be a new kind of media monster that would not only produce some of America's most popular entertainment but also control viewers' access to it.
Under the deal, which has been in the works for months, Comcast would pay $6.5 billion in cash up front and contribute $7.25 billion in cable assets to acquire a 51 percent stake in NBC Universal from its current owner, General Electric. Comcast would control the joint venture's day-to-day operations but Pentagon contractor GE would retain a 49 percent stake.
The likely impact on consumer choices? Well you tell me: the Washington Post reports that all in all, the joint venture would control more than one out of every five television-viewing hours.
The $30 billion deal certainly has consumer groups and lawmakers worried. Will there be a big regulatory battle? Congress doesn't have a great record. In 1996, a Democratic President OK'd the last great concentration of media power under the generous terms of the '96 Telecommunications Act.
Nonetheless, with almost one in four cable subscribers in the U.S. a Comcast customer and NBC Universal owning not only NBC but also dozens of cable channels, including Telemundo, MSNBC, CNBC and Bravo as well as theme parks, TV stations such as Washington's WRC (Channel 4), and Universal movie studios, the NBC Comcast deal is a biggie.
Senators John D. Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.), chairman of the Commerce Committee, and Herb Kohl (D-Wis.), of the Judiciary antitrust subcommittee, have called for hearings. Michael J. Copps, a Democratic member of the Federal Communications Commission, says the merger faces a "very steep climb" with him.
High on the list of critics' concerns are worries about the impact on online video. Would Comcast/NBC continue to make other companies' video available free, on their internet providers? Why would they? Only if government enforces Net Neutrality. In other words, only if there's a law.
In the meantime, it's time to cherish ever more all that remains in the way of independent media. And yes, that's our self interest speaking.