Dems Sell Women's Rights Down River Of Health Care Denial
A few thoughts on last night's health care reform vote and the Stupak Amendment. First of all, 21 out of the 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak then proceeded to vote against the health care reform bill. In other words, women's reproductive rights were severely compromised to appease 41 members of Congress. The final vote on the health care bill was 220-215, so only a few of those votes were needed in the first place to secure the vote. For this, in the 11th hour, Nancy Pelosi made a deal with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
A few thoughts on last night's health care reform vote and the Stupak Amendment. First of all, 21 out of the 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak then proceeded to vote against the health care reform bill. In other words, women's reproductive rights were severely compromised to appease 41 members of Congress. The final vote on the health care bill was 220-215, so only a few of those votes were needed in the first place to secure the vote. For this, in the 11th hour, Nancy Pelosi made a deal with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Many reproductive justice advocates watched the final train wreck on
C Span last night in stunned anger, trying to understand how this
happened. Jodi Jacobson, who has covered this issue very thoroughly on RH Reality Check wrote,
Why when millions of women need basic sexual and reproductive health care is it important for the USCCB to be "working out" any plan?
What does Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi or any other member of Congress
owe the Catholic Bishops that they do not owe the majority of women in
this country? What does Obama owe the Bishops that he does not owe you
and me, for example, most of those of us who gave money and time and
our lives to his campaign?Do we live in a theocracy?Honestly: I would like an answer. From the White House. From the House Leadership. And you should want one too.
One reaction that I do take issue with is Jane Hamsher's
assertion that NARAL and Planned Parenthood shoulder part of the blame
for what happened. As much as I generally respect Hamsher, her
reasoning is baffling.
But let's be clear about this. The only reason that we
are in the position where the price of passing health care reform is
allowing even liberal Marcy Kaptur to sneeringly dismiss choice
activists as narrow class warriors who don't care about working women
is because Planned Parenthood and NARAL have allowed it to happen.
They collect millions of dollars in revenue each year. They've exacted
no price from the Marcy Kapturs of the world, who actually have to care
what liberals think of them, and focused instead on anti-choice
Republicans who are only empowered by their ire. They have no scalps.
There is no price for bucking Planned Parenthood and NARAL. It isn't a
fight that the Democrats want to spend "political capital" on, and
these groups insure that they don't have to.Forget about the fact that more Americans are now anti-choice than
pro-choice for the first time since Gallup has been polling the issue.
More and more Democrats in Congress each year are
anti-choice, despite the fact that the party is . It's acceptable
now. These groups have the lobbyists, the money, the access, and their
leadership uses it for their own personal advancement while the cause
they purport to defend withers on the vine.The national Planned Parenthood organization listed $126 million in
assets in 2007. Cecile Richards made $385,163 . The state chapters
whose employees put their lives on the line so women can have the right
to choose deserve support and protection within the Democratic party
that she is not providing.NARAL paid Nancy Keenan $145,538 from the Foundation in 2007, which
listed total assets of $4,119,329. But the NARAL PAC reports $87,125
cash on hand as of September 30, 2009.
And that kind of money was a match for the Catholic Church, Big
Pharma and the Insurance companies? I don't think so. No question
there are things over the years both organizations could, in hindsight
have done better. But their accomplishments speak for themselves and
victim blaming is just not acceptable here.
As @mikkipedia
on Twitter said, "Had a nightmare that extremists took healthcare
hostage and the Dems bargained away women's rights to get it back.
Wait..." Imagine if instead we had a dream where our elected officials
stood up against the few in defense of our human rights. Imagine.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A few thoughts on last night's health care reform vote and the Stupak Amendment. First of all, 21 out of the 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak then proceeded to vote against the health care reform bill. In other words, women's reproductive rights were severely compromised to appease 41 members of Congress. The final vote on the health care bill was 220-215, so only a few of those votes were needed in the first place to secure the vote. For this, in the 11th hour, Nancy Pelosi made a deal with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Many reproductive justice advocates watched the final train wreck on
C Span last night in stunned anger, trying to understand how this
happened. Jodi Jacobson, who has covered this issue very thoroughly on RH Reality Check wrote,
Why when millions of women need basic sexual and reproductive health care is it important for the USCCB to be "working out" any plan?
What does Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi or any other member of Congress
owe the Catholic Bishops that they do not owe the majority of women in
this country? What does Obama owe the Bishops that he does not owe you
and me, for example, most of those of us who gave money and time and
our lives to his campaign?Do we live in a theocracy?Honestly: I would like an answer. From the White House. From the House Leadership. And you should want one too.
One reaction that I do take issue with is Jane Hamsher's
assertion that NARAL and Planned Parenthood shoulder part of the blame
for what happened. As much as I generally respect Hamsher, her
reasoning is baffling.
But let's be clear about this. The only reason that we
are in the position where the price of passing health care reform is
allowing even liberal Marcy Kaptur to sneeringly dismiss choice
activists as narrow class warriors who don't care about working women
is because Planned Parenthood and NARAL have allowed it to happen.
They collect millions of dollars in revenue each year. They've exacted
no price from the Marcy Kapturs of the world, who actually have to care
what liberals think of them, and focused instead on anti-choice
Republicans who are only empowered by their ire. They have no scalps.
There is no price for bucking Planned Parenthood and NARAL. It isn't a
fight that the Democrats want to spend "political capital" on, and
these groups insure that they don't have to.Forget about the fact that more Americans are now anti-choice than
pro-choice for the first time since Gallup has been polling the issue.
More and more Democrats in Congress each year are
anti-choice, despite the fact that the party is . It's acceptable
now. These groups have the lobbyists, the money, the access, and their
leadership uses it for their own personal advancement while the cause
they purport to defend withers on the vine.The national Planned Parenthood organization listed $126 million in
assets in 2007. Cecile Richards made $385,163 . The state chapters
whose employees put their lives on the line so women can have the right
to choose deserve support and protection within the Democratic party
that she is not providing.NARAL paid Nancy Keenan $145,538 from the Foundation in 2007, which
listed total assets of $4,119,329. But the NARAL PAC reports $87,125
cash on hand as of September 30, 2009.
And that kind of money was a match for the Catholic Church, Big
Pharma and the Insurance companies? I don't think so. No question
there are things over the years both organizations could, in hindsight
have done better. But their accomplishments speak for themselves and
victim blaming is just not acceptable here.
As @mikkipedia
on Twitter said, "Had a nightmare that extremists took healthcare
hostage and the Dems bargained away women's rights to get it back.
Wait..." Imagine if instead we had a dream where our elected officials
stood up against the few in defense of our human rights. Imagine.
A few thoughts on last night's health care reform vote and the Stupak Amendment. First of all, 21 out of the 64 Democrats who voted for Stupak then proceeded to vote against the health care reform bill. In other words, women's reproductive rights were severely compromised to appease 41 members of Congress. The final vote on the health care bill was 220-215, so only a few of those votes were needed in the first place to secure the vote. For this, in the 11th hour, Nancy Pelosi made a deal with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
Many reproductive justice advocates watched the final train wreck on
C Span last night in stunned anger, trying to understand how this
happened. Jodi Jacobson, who has covered this issue very thoroughly on RH Reality Check wrote,
Why when millions of women need basic sexual and reproductive health care is it important for the USCCB to be "working out" any plan?
What does Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi or any other member of Congress
owe the Catholic Bishops that they do not owe the majority of women in
this country? What does Obama owe the Bishops that he does not owe you
and me, for example, most of those of us who gave money and time and
our lives to his campaign?Do we live in a theocracy?Honestly: I would like an answer. From the White House. From the House Leadership. And you should want one too.
One reaction that I do take issue with is Jane Hamsher's
assertion that NARAL and Planned Parenthood shoulder part of the blame
for what happened. As much as I generally respect Hamsher, her
reasoning is baffling.
But let's be clear about this. The only reason that we
are in the position where the price of passing health care reform is
allowing even liberal Marcy Kaptur to sneeringly dismiss choice
activists as narrow class warriors who don't care about working women
is because Planned Parenthood and NARAL have allowed it to happen.
They collect millions of dollars in revenue each year. They've exacted
no price from the Marcy Kapturs of the world, who actually have to care
what liberals think of them, and focused instead on anti-choice
Republicans who are only empowered by their ire. They have no scalps.
There is no price for bucking Planned Parenthood and NARAL. It isn't a
fight that the Democrats want to spend "political capital" on, and
these groups insure that they don't have to.Forget about the fact that more Americans are now anti-choice than
pro-choice for the first time since Gallup has been polling the issue.
More and more Democrats in Congress each year are
anti-choice, despite the fact that the party is . It's acceptable
now. These groups have the lobbyists, the money, the access, and their
leadership uses it for their own personal advancement while the cause
they purport to defend withers on the vine.The national Planned Parenthood organization listed $126 million in
assets in 2007. Cecile Richards made $385,163 . The state chapters
whose employees put their lives on the line so women can have the right
to choose deserve support and protection within the Democratic party
that she is not providing.NARAL paid Nancy Keenan $145,538 from the Foundation in 2007, which
listed total assets of $4,119,329. But the NARAL PAC reports $87,125
cash on hand as of September 30, 2009.
And that kind of money was a match for the Catholic Church, Big
Pharma and the Insurance companies? I don't think so. No question
there are things over the years both organizations could, in hindsight
have done better. But their accomplishments speak for themselves and
victim blaming is just not acceptable here.
As @mikkipedia
on Twitter said, "Had a nightmare that extremists took healthcare
hostage and the Dems bargained away women's rights to get it back.
Wait..." Imagine if instead we had a dream where our elected officials
stood up against the few in defense of our human rights. Imagine.