

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Have you participated much in the debate swirling around George Sodini? He's the man who walked into an aerobics class in Collier, Pa., last week, killed three women and wounded nine more. Since then I've heard more than a few discussions about gun control. See, it turns out that at least three of the guns Sodini had with him in the workout class he had purchased legally and this has fueled the argument that we Americans buy guns too easily.
Have you participated much in the debate swirling around George Sodini? He's the man who walked into an aerobics class in Collier, Pa., last week, killed three women and wounded nine more. Since then I've heard more than a few discussions about gun control. See, it turns out that at least three of the guns Sodini had with him in the workout class he had purchased legally and this has fueled the argument that we Americans buy guns too easily.
I'd like to pose another possibility. I think we Americans kill too easily. Let's face it, guns don't kill people, Americans kill people.
If you read the list of guns the Allegheny County police superintendent says Sodini carried into the LA Fitness center, they include two 9 mm handguns, a .38 and a .45. He had four, but he really only needed one. Typical American: way too much firepower for the job. And sure, Sodini took the easy way out; it is, after all, easier to shoot 12 women all at once than it is to lie in wait for them one at a time and then kill them at close range with a knife or silk stocking. But that's just what Jack the Ripper and the Boston Strangler did to their victims. I cite these notorious serial killers because they don't require a lot of definition here to make my point -- neither one of them had a gun.
The United States loves its weapons. We love our handguns and we love our cluster bombs. Remember the horror we justifiably felt when the terrorists in Iraq released video of Nicholas Berg being beheaded. The graphic killing of this young man was gruesome, heartless, senseless, and we were outraged.
How many folks do you think a cluster bomb decapitates? The use of our sophisticated weapons to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis makes us what? Sophisticated? USAToday conducted a four-month study of cluster bomb use in Iraq in 2003 and found that one such bombing attack ripped the legs off Rashid Mahid and he bled to death through his torso on a Baghdad street. In fact, in those four months USA Today found "dozens of deaths that were unintended but predictable. Although U.S. forces sought to limit what they call 'collateral damage' in the Iraq campaign, they defied international criticism and used nearly 10,800 cluster weapons." And mind you, that was in the first six months of the war.
Use of powerful weapons by the world's most powerful military is just a sign of power, not an indication of righteousness. Just as the use of powerful weapons in an aerobics class sure didn't make Sodini a good man with a bad gun. Even a quick glance at Sodini's senseless murders proves them to be just that: senseless. See gun enthusiasts, collectors, and hunters would have you believe -- and I concur -- that a person could own a thousand guns and never harm a human being.
No, all this national debate over handguns stops us from talking about what's really at the core of our nation's problems. We are a violent and vengeful people. We resort to brutality on the national stage when things don't go our way maybe because we resort to brutality in our homes for the same reasons. Or maybe our violent homes are a product of a violent government setting a large scale shock and awe kind of example. But whether the killing chicken comes before or after the killer egg, it's time to get a better understanding of ourselves and who and why we kill.
If you read even a small portion of Sodini's thousands of online blogging pages you can learn a little about the culture of violence. And those pages tell us the most basic thing: rejected by woman after woman, Sodini killed what he couldn't have or couldn't control. And in the end that behavior even included killing himself.
Perhaps the final lesson of Sodini's killing spree should as a culture scare us the most: bullies eventually turn their weapons around and destroy themselves.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Have you participated much in the debate swirling around George Sodini? He's the man who walked into an aerobics class in Collier, Pa., last week, killed three women and wounded nine more. Since then I've heard more than a few discussions about gun control. See, it turns out that at least three of the guns Sodini had with him in the workout class he had purchased legally and this has fueled the argument that we Americans buy guns too easily.
I'd like to pose another possibility. I think we Americans kill too easily. Let's face it, guns don't kill people, Americans kill people.
If you read the list of guns the Allegheny County police superintendent says Sodini carried into the LA Fitness center, they include two 9 mm handguns, a .38 and a .45. He had four, but he really only needed one. Typical American: way too much firepower for the job. And sure, Sodini took the easy way out; it is, after all, easier to shoot 12 women all at once than it is to lie in wait for them one at a time and then kill them at close range with a knife or silk stocking. But that's just what Jack the Ripper and the Boston Strangler did to their victims. I cite these notorious serial killers because they don't require a lot of definition here to make my point -- neither one of them had a gun.
The United States loves its weapons. We love our handguns and we love our cluster bombs. Remember the horror we justifiably felt when the terrorists in Iraq released video of Nicholas Berg being beheaded. The graphic killing of this young man was gruesome, heartless, senseless, and we were outraged.
How many folks do you think a cluster bomb decapitates? The use of our sophisticated weapons to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis makes us what? Sophisticated? USAToday conducted a four-month study of cluster bomb use in Iraq in 2003 and found that one such bombing attack ripped the legs off Rashid Mahid and he bled to death through his torso on a Baghdad street. In fact, in those four months USA Today found "dozens of deaths that were unintended but predictable. Although U.S. forces sought to limit what they call 'collateral damage' in the Iraq campaign, they defied international criticism and used nearly 10,800 cluster weapons." And mind you, that was in the first six months of the war.
Use of powerful weapons by the world's most powerful military is just a sign of power, not an indication of righteousness. Just as the use of powerful weapons in an aerobics class sure didn't make Sodini a good man with a bad gun. Even a quick glance at Sodini's senseless murders proves them to be just that: senseless. See gun enthusiasts, collectors, and hunters would have you believe -- and I concur -- that a person could own a thousand guns and never harm a human being.
No, all this national debate over handguns stops us from talking about what's really at the core of our nation's problems. We are a violent and vengeful people. We resort to brutality on the national stage when things don't go our way maybe because we resort to brutality in our homes for the same reasons. Or maybe our violent homes are a product of a violent government setting a large scale shock and awe kind of example. But whether the killing chicken comes before or after the killer egg, it's time to get a better understanding of ourselves and who and why we kill.
If you read even a small portion of Sodini's thousands of online blogging pages you can learn a little about the culture of violence. And those pages tell us the most basic thing: rejected by woman after woman, Sodini killed what he couldn't have or couldn't control. And in the end that behavior even included killing himself.
Perhaps the final lesson of Sodini's killing spree should as a culture scare us the most: bullies eventually turn their weapons around and destroy themselves.
Have you participated much in the debate swirling around George Sodini? He's the man who walked into an aerobics class in Collier, Pa., last week, killed three women and wounded nine more. Since then I've heard more than a few discussions about gun control. See, it turns out that at least three of the guns Sodini had with him in the workout class he had purchased legally and this has fueled the argument that we Americans buy guns too easily.
I'd like to pose another possibility. I think we Americans kill too easily. Let's face it, guns don't kill people, Americans kill people.
If you read the list of guns the Allegheny County police superintendent says Sodini carried into the LA Fitness center, they include two 9 mm handguns, a .38 and a .45. He had four, but he really only needed one. Typical American: way too much firepower for the job. And sure, Sodini took the easy way out; it is, after all, easier to shoot 12 women all at once than it is to lie in wait for them one at a time and then kill them at close range with a knife or silk stocking. But that's just what Jack the Ripper and the Boston Strangler did to their victims. I cite these notorious serial killers because they don't require a lot of definition here to make my point -- neither one of them had a gun.
The United States loves its weapons. We love our handguns and we love our cluster bombs. Remember the horror we justifiably felt when the terrorists in Iraq released video of Nicholas Berg being beheaded. The graphic killing of this young man was gruesome, heartless, senseless, and we were outraged.
How many folks do you think a cluster bomb decapitates? The use of our sophisticated weapons to kill hundreds of thousands of Iraqis makes us what? Sophisticated? USAToday conducted a four-month study of cluster bomb use in Iraq in 2003 and found that one such bombing attack ripped the legs off Rashid Mahid and he bled to death through his torso on a Baghdad street. In fact, in those four months USA Today found "dozens of deaths that were unintended but predictable. Although U.S. forces sought to limit what they call 'collateral damage' in the Iraq campaign, they defied international criticism and used nearly 10,800 cluster weapons." And mind you, that was in the first six months of the war.
Use of powerful weapons by the world's most powerful military is just a sign of power, not an indication of righteousness. Just as the use of powerful weapons in an aerobics class sure didn't make Sodini a good man with a bad gun. Even a quick glance at Sodini's senseless murders proves them to be just that: senseless. See gun enthusiasts, collectors, and hunters would have you believe -- and I concur -- that a person could own a thousand guns and never harm a human being.
No, all this national debate over handguns stops us from talking about what's really at the core of our nation's problems. We are a violent and vengeful people. We resort to brutality on the national stage when things don't go our way maybe because we resort to brutality in our homes for the same reasons. Or maybe our violent homes are a product of a violent government setting a large scale shock and awe kind of example. But whether the killing chicken comes before or after the killer egg, it's time to get a better understanding of ourselves and who and why we kill.
If you read even a small portion of Sodini's thousands of online blogging pages you can learn a little about the culture of violence. And those pages tell us the most basic thing: rejected by woman after woman, Sodini killed what he couldn't have or couldn't control. And in the end that behavior even included killing himself.
Perhaps the final lesson of Sodini's killing spree should as a culture scare us the most: bullies eventually turn their weapons around and destroy themselves.