

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The NYT is reporting that PhRMA will spend $150 million in advertising to support the White House health care plan in August:
The drug industry has already
contributed millions of dollars to advertising campaigns for the health
care overhaul through the advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now
and Families USA. It has spent about $1 million on similar
advertisements under its own name.All of the commercials closely echo common Democratic themes about
medical care for all, consumer protection and "health insurance
reform." Some supporters of the overhaul have hired public affairs and
advertising firms with close ties to the White House and Senate
Democrats, including GMMB, which worked on the Obama campaign, and
AKPD, which previously included David Axelrod, who is now the
president's top political adviser.
In a statement released by the President on June 20:
I am pleased to announce that an
agreement has been reached between Senator Max Baucus and the nation's
pharmaceutical companies that will bring down health care costs and
reduce the price of prescription drugs for millions of America's
seniors. As part of the health reform legislation that I expect
Congress to enact this year, pharmaceutical companies will extend
discounts on prescription drugs to millions of seniors who currently
are subjected to crushing out-of-pocket expenses when the yearly
amounts they pay for medication fall within the doughnut hole any
payments by seniors not covered by Medicare that fall between $2700 and
$6153.75 per year.
Former Blue Dog Billy Tauzin, who now heads PhRMA, told the New York
Times it was a "rock solid deal." Jim "Stickboy" Messina (Obama's "Josh
Lyman") "confirmed Mr. Tauzin's account of the deal in an e-mail
message" to the NYT.
McJoan asked
the other day if Baucus is writing the White House's health care bill.
I don't think there is any question that he is, that Tauzin knows he
is, and that the idea that he's "holding up" the White House is not
grounded in reality. And that the deal cuts the legs out from
underneath Jeff Merkeley, who was trying to negotiate for $63 billion in rebates for drugs provided under Medicare.
The only question is how much the Democrats got in exchange for gutting the government's ability to control health care costs.
During the campaign, this was Obama's position:
Obama will allow Americans to buy their
medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and
prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that
prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion.
It no longer appears on the health care page at mybarackobama.com.
But, let's do the math. In ten years, $30 billion a year would
mean $300 billion in savings. The deal cut by the White House is for
$80 billion in savings. So the pharmaceutical industry gets to keep
$220 billion for the low low price of $150 million in August to pass
health care reform so Rahm Emanual won't be 13-1.
A hundred fifty million for two hundred twenty billion in savings: an excellent return on investment by anyone's standards.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The NYT is reporting that PhRMA will spend $150 million in advertising to support the White House health care plan in August:
The drug industry has already
contributed millions of dollars to advertising campaigns for the health
care overhaul through the advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now
and Families USA. It has spent about $1 million on similar
advertisements under its own name.All of the commercials closely echo common Democratic themes about
medical care for all, consumer protection and "health insurance
reform." Some supporters of the overhaul have hired public affairs and
advertising firms with close ties to the White House and Senate
Democrats, including GMMB, which worked on the Obama campaign, and
AKPD, which previously included David Axelrod, who is now the
president's top political adviser.
In a statement released by the President on June 20:
I am pleased to announce that an
agreement has been reached between Senator Max Baucus and the nation's
pharmaceutical companies that will bring down health care costs and
reduce the price of prescription drugs for millions of America's
seniors. As part of the health reform legislation that I expect
Congress to enact this year, pharmaceutical companies will extend
discounts on prescription drugs to millions of seniors who currently
are subjected to crushing out-of-pocket expenses when the yearly
amounts they pay for medication fall within the doughnut hole any
payments by seniors not covered by Medicare that fall between $2700 and
$6153.75 per year.
Former Blue Dog Billy Tauzin, who now heads PhRMA, told the New York
Times it was a "rock solid deal." Jim "Stickboy" Messina (Obama's "Josh
Lyman") "confirmed Mr. Tauzin's account of the deal in an e-mail
message" to the NYT.
McJoan asked
the other day if Baucus is writing the White House's health care bill.
I don't think there is any question that he is, that Tauzin knows he
is, and that the idea that he's "holding up" the White House is not
grounded in reality. And that the deal cuts the legs out from
underneath Jeff Merkeley, who was trying to negotiate for $63 billion in rebates for drugs provided under Medicare.
The only question is how much the Democrats got in exchange for gutting the government's ability to control health care costs.
During the campaign, this was Obama's position:
Obama will allow Americans to buy their
medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and
prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that
prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion.
It no longer appears on the health care page at mybarackobama.com.
But, let's do the math. In ten years, $30 billion a year would
mean $300 billion in savings. The deal cut by the White House is for
$80 billion in savings. So the pharmaceutical industry gets to keep
$220 billion for the low low price of $150 million in August to pass
health care reform so Rahm Emanual won't be 13-1.
A hundred fifty million for two hundred twenty billion in savings: an excellent return on investment by anyone's standards.
The NYT is reporting that PhRMA will spend $150 million in advertising to support the White House health care plan in August:
The drug industry has already
contributed millions of dollars to advertising campaigns for the health
care overhaul through the advocacy groups like Healthy Economies Now
and Families USA. It has spent about $1 million on similar
advertisements under its own name.All of the commercials closely echo common Democratic themes about
medical care for all, consumer protection and "health insurance
reform." Some supporters of the overhaul have hired public affairs and
advertising firms with close ties to the White House and Senate
Democrats, including GMMB, which worked on the Obama campaign, and
AKPD, which previously included David Axelrod, who is now the
president's top political adviser.
In a statement released by the President on June 20:
I am pleased to announce that an
agreement has been reached between Senator Max Baucus and the nation's
pharmaceutical companies that will bring down health care costs and
reduce the price of prescription drugs for millions of America's
seniors. As part of the health reform legislation that I expect
Congress to enact this year, pharmaceutical companies will extend
discounts on prescription drugs to millions of seniors who currently
are subjected to crushing out-of-pocket expenses when the yearly
amounts they pay for medication fall within the doughnut hole any
payments by seniors not covered by Medicare that fall between $2700 and
$6153.75 per year.
Former Blue Dog Billy Tauzin, who now heads PhRMA, told the New York
Times it was a "rock solid deal." Jim "Stickboy" Messina (Obama's "Josh
Lyman") "confirmed Mr. Tauzin's account of the deal in an e-mail
message" to the NYT.
McJoan asked
the other day if Baucus is writing the White House's health care bill.
I don't think there is any question that he is, that Tauzin knows he
is, and that the idea that he's "holding up" the White House is not
grounded in reality. And that the deal cuts the legs out from
underneath Jeff Merkeley, who was trying to negotiate for $63 billion in rebates for drugs provided under Medicare.
The only question is how much the Democrats got in exchange for gutting the government's ability to control health care costs.
During the campaign, this was Obama's position:
Obama will allow Americans to buy their
medicines from other developed countries if the drugs are safe and
prices are lower outside the U.S. Obama will also repeal the ban that
prevents the government from negotiating with drug companies, which could result in savings as high as $30 billion.
It no longer appears on the health care page at mybarackobama.com.
But, let's do the math. In ten years, $30 billion a year would
mean $300 billion in savings. The deal cut by the White House is for
$80 billion in savings. So the pharmaceutical industry gets to keep
$220 billion for the low low price of $150 million in August to pass
health care reform so Rahm Emanual won't be 13-1.
A hundred fifty million for two hundred twenty billion in savings: an excellent return on investment by anyone's standards.